LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteWell, with the 8MB cache you are going to gain preformance overall.
Spend the extra cash and gove yourself a better performance boost!
How can you argue with that?!!!
Opus :D
western digital vs. seagate hi...i would like to buy new hard discs...i've heard western digital ata 100 7200 rpm 8 mb cache are good but are lit bit more expensive than seagate barracada 4 ata 100 7200 rpm wich are good and for good price too...well what do you think guys?...actualy if the western digital are better maybe i'll go for it...
but i really want you to help me in this case...please...
reagards...gabi_k
Re: western digital vs. seagate Well, with the 8MB cache you are going to gain preformance overall.
Spend the extra cash and gove yourself a better performance boost!
How can you argue with that?!!!
Opus :D
Re: western digital vs. seagate well...thank you opus...my idea is to buy a western digital 80 gb for data and stuff,and a seagate 40 gb for op...is that a good idea?...what do you think opus?...
Re: western digital vs. seagate WD all the way around my friend!
80GB for data and 40GB for OS and Apps!
When I first got my WD 40GB I had a project that had used up 40% of my CPU...got the 40GB and it went down to about 20%!!
That tell you anything!
Opus :D
Re: western digital vs. seagate thanks opus...take a look at my new DAW and tell me your opinion...thaks
ANTEC PLUS 1080 (CASE)
ASUS P4PE
P4 2.4G
1G DDR 333
WESTERN DIGITAL 80GB FOR DATA
SEAGATE 40 GB FOR OP
MATROX G550
PLEXTOR 48X24X48
AUDIOPHILE 24/96
...if there is something wrong...just let me know...
regards...gabriel
Re: western digital vs. seagate I'm using a 120 WDJB with a dual XP boot, and a 180 WDJB for data.
The data disk never bumps the meter in Nuendo with 24 tracks.
Thanks Opus for the tips on the computer everything is working great.
Larry
:w:
Larry Howard
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks