Having never played with Pro Tools myself, I'm not going to handle this one, but let it pass on to other wiser and more experienced. Then why did I even answer? Damit!
i ve been recording in my home studio for many years
i used an RME fireface 800 and rme mictasy mic preamp all these years
but now i am going to open my own pro studio
here is my setup now
APPLE MAC PRO 8 CORE 3,2GHZ
Avalon VT-737SP
Focusrite RED 1
AMS Neve 1073 DPD
TUBE-TECH MEC
Neumann..Shure and AKG mics
and klein + hummel monitors
i ve reached a point that i think i should work with Pro Tools
i ve never used the before...and i want some opinion..
i know for sure that i ll get the hd 2
but i dont know what interface or interfaces i should have that will go better for my setup
should i go with the 192 plus and 8 analoge input expansion card..
or for two 96 and a good converter?
sorry for my english guys if they are not so good..i am greek..hehe
Having never played with Pro Tools myself, I'm not going to handle this one, but let it pass on to other wiser and more experienced. Then why did I even answer? Damit!
Knowledge is what you get when you read the fine print - experience is what you get when you don't.
Like basilbowman I've never used ProTools, but the general opinion here is that ProTools is expensive and horrible to use. It's only used because of corporate domination, really.
If you're set on it, fair enough.
However, 192KHz is a joke IMO. For most needs you're better to stick with 96KHz and cut your processing and disk space needed in half, yet still retaining at least 99% of noticable quality.
Curious button pushing Church sound guy has returned from ... wherever he was.
I'd like to clarify, SoundBlasters will do the job.
But they'll do a bloody awful one.
hmmmm...i see...thats why i am confused!
i dont know what interface..or interfaces will go for my setup
hey!!!
79 views and no suggestions?
please help!
I just saw a post, I forget where, with REMY saying something along the lines of "If you need to learn Pro Tools, you can do it in about a week, thusly the only reason to learn it now is because there are a huge amount of books, tutorials, DVDS, etc. for PT." Paraphrased to be sure, but if it comes from REMY it must be useful, eh?
Nathan
Whoa there Nathan - that came from me, and while it's still my opinion, I know a lot less about recording than Remy, so it should be taken with a grain of salt. Also, my comment was directed at someone starting a home studio who didn't (yet) need to meet the expectations of paying clients. Capellino's question seems to me more of a marketing question for a pro studio. He's looking at PT in order to satisfy clients. I certainly have no idea what clients expect in Greece, so I don't feel I can give him any advice. I guess my opinion can be summarized as "I want to use PT because the pros use it" is a bad reason; "I want to use PT because my clients want it" is a good reason - but to use that reason, you have to have clients, and they have to want PT.Originally Posted by basilbowman
Ah, my bad, many apologies - Guess I shouldn't be so hasty to jump in on topics I don't know what the hell I'm talking about and start misquoting others, eh?Doh!
"Better to keep your mouth shut and be presumed a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt."
Oh nuts.
(If you didn't get it, don't worry, it didn't work too well. The idea was that I said that and now I'm a fool)
PS +1 to BobRogers.
I think I'm just going to start paying more attention to my signature...
Bookmarks