yes, in a simple, single-secondary system that's correct... do it at the AC side of the bridge. However your meter will only give a true power reading if it's a true RMS meter, otherwise it'll be close but some error might be anticipated. The transformer won't be feeding a true, continuous current load, because it'll be "topping-up" the smoothing caps in bursts. That means the current draw will be bursty, rather than a smooth sine waveform. For a true RMS power calculation, your meter will have to calculate the true RMS current, which averaging meters don't really indicate. -They usually set them for minimum error with a true sine... in this case your current draw will not be a sine, so if you have an averaging meter, you should allow yourself a safe margin of error...
Fluke 87, etc all say TRUE RMS on the front, and they can be trusted. Fluke 73 doesn't say anything on the front about RMS and so I'd be inclined to give a 10% safety margin, just in case...
Keith


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote




.gif[/img] 
Bookmarks