This is what affordable gear has done for recording ....

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 8:07 pm

Walters. Here's the deal. If you're serious, get someone to help you translate cuz no one here is really understanding what you're after.

Two, R E A D. Read the posts, read other threads, read manuals. Read anything you can get your hands on in order to aquire the language so you can better communicate in situations such as this.

From what I've read thus far in this nonsensical thread, you probably just need to EQ your tracks so you take out most of the bottom end and low mids on most everything except the keyboards.

There's no need to bounce if you've still got tracks available, by the way.

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 8:12 pm

nonsensical thread? are your serious , sorry you don't know the
answers to my questions that doesn't make it nonsensical because
you can't understand the question with the correct answer. Maybe
you need to read some manuals and go on google not me don't
project it on me thats your problem not mine

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 8:38 pm

this is so funny

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:05 pm

Todzilla wrote:

Translucent audio can be achieved by applying olfactory and tactile properties to outer edge of the sound wave. This is simple to do. First you isolate the density of the wave (where it oscillates around the prime, with an extra db to compensate for the time code errors) using spectral abstraction. Then, when the densest part of the wave has been isolated, but before it is fully abstracted, route the top half of the wave form (not the bottom half, unless you want it sound like bad 60s Op art as it looked in the 80s) through a sound fractal unit. The sound fractal unit, since it only has one half of the wave form, can reverse the density of the original waveform, without altering in any way, its sonic content.

Voila!!! Translucent Audio.

There are lots of top studios that do this with convolution inductance, but I found the above method much more straight forward.

If you look hard enough, your answer is in here. It may not be as easy or plain as you want, but that would be impossible to give as there is no set answer. There is no single switch to flip that will give you translucent superimposed audio. Unless your recorder has a diametric phase skew switch, which most of the low-end gear does not. Besides, you would need to have a grasp on how to collimate the response on your compressor optics to really have anything decent to work with.
But I guess great things have been done with less....

If you are having trouble with something specific regarding the sonic properties of fractal propagation waves, just ask and I'm sure someone here will be willing to help you once they know what you are looking for a little better.

Good luck! Smile

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:13 pm

Then give me the step by step way of doing this and what
gear i would need to do this?

If you are really serious tell me

how the setting i should use on the gear

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:20 pm

Todzilla, though joking, may be on to something. It seems we have a synesthesia problem here. Walters is obviously a visual-spatial thinker without a grasp on the exact vernacular as applies to music. In order to make a pad sporatically transparent one would have to put spectral analyzers on both tracks, following the EQ's and sweepable filters. Then you would be able to actually visualize the situation. This will be extremely tedious...and it WILL involve automation. You must automate the frequency knobs of the two EQ's using mid-to-low Q settings to isolate the exact frequencies where the guitar notes (and their corresponding harmonics) hit. Boost the guitar note by note using the automation curves to "follow" the guitar around the spectrum. At the same time you must cut the pad frequencies out wherever the guitar frequencies are boosted...this would also be automated and once again... EXTREMELY TEDIOUS!

The other option would be ducking...in combination with an automated width-control plugin.

If you (like me) think in a visual-spatial manner, SOME of these words seem to describe audio perfectly. But I don't know if you will actually "see" any translucency in the audio unless you take a bunch of acid.

PS- I used to be able to "see" if two spinning records were perfectly in time...but never when I was stone-cold sober.

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:23 pm

Oh, by the way, two of the poster's are full of shit and you don't know which ones because they are using large words that don't necessarily mean anything. Sorry to spoil your fun, guys, but this cat IS serious.

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:36 pm

Sorry, I honestly don't know a great deal about fixing broadband telemetry rejection, but that may be your actual problem. Embarassed

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 10:19 pm

oh really you guys are joking i thought this was a pro audio
forum i must be at the wrong site. Do you know which site
has serious people that like to talk about pro audio gear
and exchange ideas because this one just likes to joke around
can you give me site names so i can talk to serious people?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 11:16 pm

Kungfulio gave you a site to visit......try there....see what you can learn from them.Until then, act civil.I think it is clear that the questions you are asking and in the way you are asking them is a confusing jumble and taking offense to others spending their time trying to explain the best they can only to have you reply in a crappy manner will only cause those who were REALLY trying to help, back off and become non-responsive.Capice?Theres plenty of 'pros' on here but none that seem to want to take any more of their time to assist you.Its probably because of your attitude.Just a professional suggestion.

Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 11:27 pm

I don't think im the one with the attitude problem look at the
replys what they say insulting me and making fun of me and joking around i think before you judge me on what type a
person i am there always is a action and a reaction and i think
for you over seeing this forum you know whats going on
and your letting it go by.

Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 1:30 am

Todzilla wrote:

..... with an extra db to compensate for the time code errors.....
... Voila!!! Translucent Audio.

There are lots of top studios that do this with convolution inductance, but ...

yes very good
lol
Cool

Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 1:37 am

Im out bye

Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 1:53 am

take care
bye

Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 3:45 am

Wait, don't go!!

I was about to explain how to make peanut butter smell like the color orange using only the sound of a monkey's dreams.

Wait a minute... Can someone give me a rich synth pad and some incense? I've got some killer lyrics going on here...

This topic sponsored by: