....opinion on this organ recording....

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 6:51 pm

Hi!

What is your opinion over this recording....

I would like to here your thought about the microphones
i use in this recording Wink

Yes!! I will reveal my equipment later Rolling Eyes

http://web.telia.com/~u92121687/mp3/orgel/W_A_Mozart_Fantasi_F-moll_KV_608.mp3

http://www.rilnet.com/markuswargh

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:07 pm

In general I liked this, and also suspect from the sound that you were using a stereo pair of cardioids from the slight rise in the upper midrange.

While certain noises (stop changes, swellbox etc) are a matter of personal taste as to whether to remove or not, there are a few higher-pitched transient noises that cross the line IMO. Algorithmix reNOVator would make them disappear.

The playing is pleasantly compelling, esp in the last section!

Much editing on this?

Rich

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:29 am

Yeah I like this as well, but to me it sounds like a pair of omnis, from the LF extension. I would like slightly more room or some more/longer reverb but this is a minor complaint.

What is the mic technique?

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:58 am

Hi!!

The mic technique is ORTF stereo....

And i use Rode NT5 Shocked

with Apogee's MiniMe.

Yes!! Sonarerec... I used Waves L3 UltraMaximizer just a little. Rolling Eyes

But hey!!I must do something to compensate my microphones Embarassed

Here is another piece from the same consert.
[url]http://web.telia.com/~u92121686/musik/orgel/CH_M_Widor_Allegro_(nr_VI_op_42)-01.mp3[/url]

I'm thinking of to get me a pair of Microtech Gefell M 296.
This microphones and MiniMe must work very well together
ll'l hope Exclamation

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:20 am

Rich was spot on, well done. Those Rode's sound pretty good for cheap mics.

Not sure I believe the published FR plot for these mics though.
http://www.rode.com.au/images_brochures/NT5_Brochure.pdf

Basso, what room was it recorded in? Church, or concert hall? The reverb time is quite short.

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:38 am

It's recorded in Lulea cathedral in north sweden.

But we try to place the mic closer as usual.
So this is a experiment to find the best way to place
the microphones..

UGGHHhh....that's not easy Wink

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:12 pm

According to legend the MG296 was suggested to MG as something similar in sound to the M50c.

The questiion I would ponder is whether to buy a mic with a colored top end or something more neutral such a DPA4006TL.

And unless you must operate on battery the DAV Broadhurst Gardens #1 is a steal at $700 (stereo!)

Another factor is how to get the mics high enough so you do not have to have them in the gallery. Without a boom it is almost impossible to get far enough away from an organ to get a proper blend when the mics are in the gallery.

In Europe you might be able to find one of the discontinued AKG booms with the VERY substantial base. Wish I could find one over here!

Rich

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:46 am

_basso_
send me a mail on gunnar (dot) hellquist (at) bredband (dot) net with your phone number and I will call you in a few days time.

I have some mics that are mostly unused some weeks this summer and might want to travel to the north. Among them is my brand-new pair of M296-s.

Gunnar Hellquist

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:11 pm

_basso_ wrote:

Hi!!

The mic technique is ORTF stereo....

And i use Rode NT5 Shocked

with Apogee's MiniMe.

Exclamation

I love this combination. I have sung the praises of the NT5 many times and I don't think it's just another cheapo wannabe mic.

Quoting David

Quote:

Not sure I believe the published FR plot for these mics though.
http://www.rode.com.au/images_brochures/NT5_Brochure.pdf

David
The published frequency response for the NT5 is wrong, or else I have a very odd pair.

I also find the Mini-Me to be a nice little box, but I believe it has a slight tendency to add a little bit at the bottom end.

John

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:56 am

John Stafford wrote:

I also find the Mini-Me to be a nice little box, but I believe it has a slight tendency to add a little bit at the bottom end.

And this is a BAD thing with cardioids?

Rich

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:33 am

Sonarerec wrote:

John Stafford wrote:

I also find the Mini-Me to be a nice little box, but I believe it has a slight tendency to add a little bit at the bottom end.

And this is a BAD thing with cardioids?

Rich

I suppose that depends on what you want to do with them. It's very slight anyhow.
John

This topic sponsored by: