| Author |
Message |
NEEDADVIC1
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 14, 2008
Posts: 2
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:43 pm |
  |
I use Sony acid, and every time I record vocals I know my timing is on point, but when I hear the playback the vocals are either delayed or ahead of the beat. I've tried every thing but nothing has worked. Do you guys know what the problem is? |
_________________ HOLLA AT ME |
|
  |
 |
hueseph
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Posts: 1382
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:53 pm |
  |
First of all, one post is enough. Look on the right hand side where it says current topics.
Secondly, it would greatly help if you posted your system specs, otherwise any advice you get will be blind speculation.
The possiblity is that it's a latency issue but it is entirely possible that you are in fact off time. That's not unusual. Being exactly on time is not a natural thing. It helps to have some sort of click track going when you record. |
_________________ Ian Faith: "Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." |
|
   |
 |
Link555
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 31, 2007
Posts: 780
Location: North Vancouver
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:48 pm |
  |
|
   |
 |
hueseph
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Posts: 1382
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:51 pm |
  |
I don't know it's a stab in the dark without more info. I personally think it's user error but it's so hard to say without knowing more. |
_________________ Ian Faith: "Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." |
|
   |
 |
bent
Moderator

Joined: Oct 26, 2007
Posts: 1724
Location: Cocoa Beach, Fl
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:58 pm |
  |
-Serious stab in the dark.
Are you recording to the same drive containing the OS?
Tried raising or lowering the buffers?
Are the vox accurate across the timeline, but just might need to be selected and moved a few ms forward or back to match up - quick and easy fix there, until you find the root of the problem that is... |
_________________ -BeN(t)
*Proper gain structure makes the world go 'round!
All your base drumsticks are belong to us! - BobRogers |
|
     |
 |
multoc
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 09, 2005
Posts: 426
Location: Tecumseh, MI
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:46 pm |
  |
|
    |
 |
NEEDADVIC1
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 14, 2008
Posts: 2
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:28 pm |
  |
| bent wrote: | -
Are the vox accurate across the timeline, but just might need to be selected and moved a few ms forward or back to match up - quick and easy fix there, until you find the root of the problem that is... |
This is slowing me down, after every track I record, I find myself going back and fixing the vocals to match the track. I say the time I spent trying to fix it is about I'll say 30 mins in total. Its very tiring when you have 30 separate takes that you have to fix. The computer is at my friend's house I have more info tomorrow. |
_________________ HOLLA AT ME |
|
  |
 |
BrianaW
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Posts: 115
Location: New York
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 15, 2008 3:30 am |
  |
| multoc wrote: | | 3 feet = 1ms of delay i believe |
I second that.
Google "Audio Recording Latency". That's more than likely your problem, especially if the vocals are the only live intrument track you are recording. |
|
|
  |
 |
Cucco
Moderator

Joined: Mar 8, 2004
Posts: 4238
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:23 am |
  |
1 foot = ~ .88ms delay based on close proximity to sea level and 76 degrees farenheit.
Though this doesn't sound like it's the problem - it's a system latency, not a sound propogation latency. |
_________________ www.myspace.com/sublymerecords
www.sublymerecords.com
|
|
     |
 |
Codemonkey
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 11, 2007
Posts: 930
Location: Scotland, UK
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:03 am |
  |
Erm...I thought it was 1m = 1ms as well. I agree it ain't the problem but still.
And btw, 76F here is like WOOOFT. (24C I believe?)
Can you group the tracks, and move them all at once? If it's a fixed time offset, that is. |
_________________ Curious button pushing Church sound guy.
In Soviet Russia, Phase Cancels You!
As Celine Dion's heart will go on, MadMax will go on about Rod's sticky and bent will go on about gain structure. |
|
  |
 |
hueseph
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Posts: 1382
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:13 am |
  |
Really? Are we quibbling over +/- .22 ms? |
_________________ Ian Faith: "Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." |
|
   |
 |
Codemonkey
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 11, 2007
Posts: 930
Location: Scotland, UK
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:21 am |
  |
No, 2'3".
Cucco said that "1 foot =~ .88 ms" which I'm guessing now is probably a typo. |
_________________ Curious button pushing Church sound guy.
In Soviet Russia, Phase Cancels You!
As Celine Dion's heart will go on, MadMax will go on about Rod's sticky and bent will go on about gain structure. |
|
  |
 |
Cucco
Moderator

Joined: Mar 8, 2004
Posts: 4238
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:58 am |
  |
Nope - no typo.
Speed travels at approximately 1130 feet per second (given the air temp of about 76 degrees farenheit at less than 100 ft above sea level and a humidity of about 50%). Divide 1130 feet into 1 and you wind up with 8.8 x 10 (-4th power) which is the same as .00088 or 8.8 ms per 1 foot. |
_________________ www.myspace.com/sublymerecords
www.sublymerecords.com
|
|
     |
 |
multoc
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 09, 2005
Posts: 426
Location: Tecumseh, MI
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:34 am |
  |
|
    |
 |
Codemonkey
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 11, 2007
Posts: 930
Location: Scotland, UK
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:40 pm |
  |
OK now there IS a typo.
I'll assume it's .88 ms per 1 foot as said earlier, and not 8.8 as you just said (although 0.00088 is .88ms). |
_________________ Curious button pushing Church sound guy.
In Soviet Russia, Phase Cancels You!
As Celine Dion's heart will go on, MadMax will go on about Rod's sticky and bent will go on about gain structure. |
|
  |
 |
|
|