You mean you haven't seen those new-fangled digital record lathes?
As the record blank spins, the needle bobs up and down leaving pitted and non-pitted surfaces...
I think the pit represents some kind of "bit" of information and the smooth are represents a zero bit of some sort.
You have to have special digital turntable playback equipment - one that can read this pits and troughs. Apparently, the "bits" are translated into some sort of analog that sounds *way warmer* than traditional analog. Those with tubes in them sound even warmer!
Are you sure you haven't heard of this? I think it's called "BlakRay" or something like that...
Anyway...Sony and Philips are dropping PCM and DSD in favor of BlakRay (the new technology created by a partnership between Ortofon, Music Hall, Benz, and Koetsu) technology and will be releasing all of their old stereo and multi-channel recordings from those bad digital-era masters on BlakRay's patented mono (to minimize phasing and crosstalk) systems.
In an unprecedented move, most likely a factor of Sony's involvement, the new phase compliant signal known as:
Bias-aligned
Ultra-tolerance
Linear
Logic,
Sequential
Humbucking
Interface
Technology
will be carried over a series of 12 proprietary analog signal cables and will likely drive a new era in home listening, urging manufacturers of high-end gear to rethink (and redesign) their gear to include this new 12-way input.
When pressed recently about the matter, a spokesperson from the BlakRay consortium assured the worried public that modifications to their existing system to accept this new, revolutionary format would be painless and only set them back another $4,000.
Not to be outdone, Toshiba and HP are backing the other consortium releasing similar (in appearance only) products known as HDLP. The new format also writes to extra-long capacity 12" discs and has extensive extra features such as multi-page liner notes and high-impact protective sleeves which ensures a disc that will last a lifetime (of a fruit fly).
This consortium, initially founded by Gemini, Stanton and Montgomery Wards has released its propietary compression algorithm known as:
Kinetic
Internal
Lossless
Linear
Monophonically
Enhanced
The new algorithm is able to pass through existing connections so you can use your existing equipment. However, if your existing preamp, receiver or stereo system does not contain mono, single-ended barrier strips, you may need to purchase an adapter available at Radio Shack (Part Number 1234-69) for $399.
While standard RCA/Phono cables can be used with this particular format, it's urged by the consortium's spokesperson to only use those which are included in the box of such high-end manufacturers as Coby and Magnavox as these transmit the most appropriate signal.
Rather creative I must say.
Seriously though, I'm interested in the control of the lathe itself, not the stylus side of things or the cutting. But the D/A tech inside the control system. Does the Engineer input an analogous signal to the lathe or a digital one? (this would depend on model... But I can't find who makes them).
That lathe is the coolest thing I've seen in a long while. Makes my 18" thread cutting lathe look like a relic from the stone age.
I've kind of been trying to find some of this info myself. Particularly, where certain records were pressed. That info used to be available on the sleeve somewhere but no one is doing that anymore. I know there are corporate and independent lathe operators that cut masters... the difficulty I'm finding with vinyl now is discerning what the source format was before purchase. Gold Standard Laboratories makes amazing and thick pressings but I'm not sure if they do them in house or not. I assume depending on the date of manufacture, there are analog and digitally controlled machines... digital meaning that the lathe's mechanical and electrical functions are controlled by a PC of some sort.
That's exactly what I'm trying to figure out.
A friend of mine is a vinyl fiend and we have been noticing a lot of difference in the sounds that different records have, especially in different pressings of the same recording.
For me, analogue vs digital is like the difference between being licked and being spat on. Same thing really just a different perception.
hueseph Recording Org Pro Audio Group
Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Posts: 1329
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Like hueseph said, it's a good thing I wasn't drinking any coffee!
So really guys, in the old days, the analog tape recorder had a pair of playback heads. Sort of like a look ahead limiter in that the preview head can send analog control voltages from rectified audio to the motors turning the screw on the lathe. That's called an analog computer. And so with that, limiters were also used that were compensated for the high-frequency preemphasis boost during the cutting process. Lathe's were built in the USA by Presto Corp. who were making them back in the 1930s & forties. By Larry Scully out of Bridgeport Connecticut in the fifties through the seventies. And by Neumann who not only made the best microphones in the world, he made the best early computer-controlled lathe's and in particular the VMS70 series, that prevails today as seen in the you tube video.
Now as far as that lacquer master stuff goes... Did you notice that it was 2 old ladies in their seventies with bad eyesight & glasses? Yeah, great quality control there. The guy punching the holes through the lacquer master's, was also in his seventies. The mastering engineer only had one arm! I think this was filmed in a hospital? And the announcer had a decidedly Canadian accent, eh? But we can't do anything a boat that. What they didn't tell you was that Direct Metal Mastering on copper masters sounds way better than cutting into lousy lacquer. I don't know who's doing that anymore? But the last albums I had mastered I would only go with Direct Metal Mastering and that was in the early 1980s. Of course there is also half speed mastering which sounds different again from real-time. Nobody's got the equalization curves right that way plus it's twice as boring to listen to while mastering. You just can't get around the analog stuff either. Nobody wants to because it still sounds better than anything digital. So all mastering is a hybrid procedure these days of one sort or another. It's not just what you see on television. Although I really love the " How Do They Do It" show on Discovery Networks. Especially the one about toilets but that's some other crap we can talk about another time.
Becoming a mastering engineer because someone wants to pay me to become one. Really. I'm not kidding. Go figure? I'll bite. Digital only, with analog stuff, thank you.
Ms. Remy Ann David
Thomas W. Bethel Recording Org Pro Audio Group
Joined: Dec 12, 2001
Posts: 1847
Location: Oberlin, OH
_________________ -TOM-
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Thomas W. Bethel
Managing Director
Acoustik Musik, Ltd.
Room with a View Productions
Oberlin, OH 44074
http://www.acoustikmusik.com
Just to wrap things up, using the above information I was able to find a Mastering Engineer with a Direct Metal Mastering lathe, a Neumann 82. He told me they convert the signal to digital then process to get the variable pitch down pat to create the most "synthetic" of records. Useful information if I wish to produce music in the future with high quality digital gear.
As for analogous recording (or just getting the analogue goodness from records), the earlier Neumann lathes (which he has as well) are the best for making variable pitch cuttings on lacquer, but he recommends using a fixed pitch lathe tweaked by hand gives the best sound.
Thanks again to all who helped me get to where I am now, in regards to cutting vinyl I now know what I wanted to know.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum