Overhead Phase

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:41 pm

thanks

I got to try this setup more extensively last week and all in all it worked out great.

The only grief I have is that even with my condensor overheads all the way down it still clips sometimes because of the snare sometimes (and theyre pointed at the toms). I have them pretty much as high as they can go. I think I can pretty much solve this problem with a little work but after listening to the mixdowned drums there is this barely noticeable like delay thing on the kick drum.

What is a good way to make sure the kick and snare mics are in phase and all with the two overheads? Keep in mind that I'm somewhat limited when it comes to the overheads height.

thanks

Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 10:42 pm

wow! 2001 this post started. beautiful post by the way. took me 2 days to read it.
ok anyways, after reading everyones comment, (thanks for the examples to everyone who had examples, i wish we could hear rm's "3d drums") i had some questions myself.

with this technique, doesnt it work mainly because the mics r the same distance from the snare and kik drum? if thats the case couldnt i essentially then have the mics drastically and exagerated anywhere i wanted them as long as they were both the same distance from the snare and kik.

now when i did this i thought it sounded good. it sounded like it does when i stand by the drummer when he plays. the sound i want to achieve is a wider more open sound, like the cymbals r on the outside of the speakers any ideas for that?

again great post -jal

Posted: Sun May 16, 2004 1:21 pm

bump

Posted: Mon May 17, 2004 12:28 pm

The whole idea of the technique is for the drums to sound like they would at the drummers position.

If you move the mics away frm the drum kit, you will get a wider soundstage but at the expense of loseing focus and definition of the kick and snare ... toms will suffer also ... Room refelections will become more eveident and the sound will become more washed out.

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:19 pm

so lets bring it up again... (by popular request) Very Happy

Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:15 pm

welcome to the thread that will never die

Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 1:07 pm

Take a sm57 and a 451. (or a 57 and any other small diaphram /pencil style condenser). Put some head phones on. Hold them together so that they face the same way and the capsules are about even. In a normal voice talk into the both of them, alternately muting and adjusting levels until they're of equal loudness. Now flip one out of polarity. Hear the "phase-y ness?" Slide the 451 Along the sm57 until you get the most out of phase sound you can (your voice gets thin and loses volumn). Now if you tape the two mic together at this point; put them both in polarity together you now have a two mic set-up that can be held on one sm57 mic clip and will give you the top two snare mics, of a three mic set-up (two top/one bottom) that is somewhat common in some circles. Mainly you gotten to hear how you CAN hear effect of "phase". If you adjust the balance of your mic's, in you headphones you can extrapolate this principle until you become allergic to phase. All your mics will be in , relative too each other, as much as you want.[/quote]

So here's more fuel to the fire for this post that will NEVER die (not that it should)

Recorderman above was talking about a 3 mic set up on a snare. I too enjoy doing this 57 and a condensor on the snare top. I find that the condensor adds a nice top end that the 57 dosn't but alone is anemic.
I have always thought that if you have 2 mics next to each other with the diaphrams lined up. (ie try your damndest to put two mics in the exact same position) that they would be IN PHASE I have seen this many times on the Royer website (and elsewhere) where engineers line up a 57/R-121/md421 setup on gtr amps etc. Is this type of settup not in phase??? When i set up my snare I put the 57 where I want it then put the LD Condensor right next to it just almost touching. I also make shure the diaphram (not end of mic) is as close to being lined up as possible. I also do this when testing to see which mic I want to use for a source, put 'em in the same spot and a/b. That way I know what the mic is saying and not what the positioning is saying.

Any help?

Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 11:55 am

whoops, the top half of the last post was supposed to be a quote from Recorderman in case you didn't catch on.

Ok. so I tried the "recorderman overhead" technique today and it does sound good, however I find that I get a little too much hat and ride in the oh's. I'm 32" above the snare, both mics pointing at the snare. I tried pointing more at toms but it didn't help. I do like how the technique gives more cohesiveness to the whole kit. The kick, toms and cymbals sound like 1 big nice instrument not several instruments recorded seperately and put together. My only other dislike would be that since so much snare is coming thru the oh I'm not getting a real nice snare in the center. I'm micing the snare top, bottom and shell up the center but it's still a big stereo sounding snare. Not particually bad but just different.

Any ideas on how to reduce hat and ride in the oh's and get the snare a little more in the center?

Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:50 pm

i dont have much to add but i just wanted to brag that im excited to try this technique again.... with my new condensor mics!!

before i was using real cheap ($80 for the pair) MXL ldc mics but i just got my two audix scx-one mics today (small diaphgram)!! cant wait to try them out!

i think i might try using one of my mxl condensor mics on snare with my 57 because of your suggestion... i have one empty input left anyways.

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:52 pm

Recordman explains it well. Check it out::

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiFOD1EeKhQ

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:47 am

bigtree wrote:

Recordman explains it well. Check it out::

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiFOD1EeKhQ

sweet! very helpful and useful!

This topic sponsored by: