| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Recording.org PRO SHOP Categories |
| |
|
|
|
| Pro Shop Random Audio Product |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 79950647 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
Playjerise
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 19, 2005
Posts: 16
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 23, 2006 12:38 am |
  |
Hey all,
Just wanting to hear everyones thoughts on their preffered method of recording heavily distorted electric guitar (lets say a marshall JCM2000 stack) in the studio.
What are your preffered mic options and why?
How do you all get a phat crunchy guitar sound..EQ/layering/panning etc??
Would be good to hear some suggestions as I have a project coming up.
Thanks all
Jake |
|
|
  |
 |
took-the-red-pill
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Posts: 316
Location: Near Clagary
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 23, 2006 1:36 am |
  |
Well, I ain't got no marshal stack, but I'm running all tubes, a Strat and a reasonably inexpensive Peavey Classic 30. I've been trying different things and multiple mics and such lately and I keep coming back to:
-a 1/2" condenser about 1 foot away from the speaker and a tad off centre.
-I play 3 identical passes, panned L-C-R
-I might add a hair of 4.5KhZ. Lately I've been leaving the bottom end EQ in and have the bass follow the guitar exactly. They haven't been conflicting so far.
-I throw in a bit of chorus to taste, and leave out the verb.
-Oh, and even though it seems counter intuitive, I turn things down at the amp, both the pre and post, and it seems to sound better, more balls, than running flat out and loud.
-I've found I can lay off the compressor and the chunky palmed notes still come through for me. Maybe a sniff of compression, but not much is necessary.
It's simple, but it floats my boat.
I once asked a similar question and the guys basically said you should get the tone, effects, and sound you want at the amp, the way the guitarist wants to sound, and then just mic that sound and run pretty much what is coming out of the box. It seems to have worked for me.
Oh, and remember, you always have to hold your tongue the right way. And as everyone knows, the most important thing while mixing is the colour of your socks.
Keith |
_________________ Take the blue pill and you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. Take the red pill and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes...Morpheus |
|
   |
 |
Nirvalica
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 10, 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Sparta, NJ
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 23, 2006 2:31 pm |
  |
| took-the-red-pill wrote: | | Oh, and remember, you always have to hold your tongue the right way. And as everyone knows, the most important thing while mixing is the colour of your socks. | yes. this is especially true with heavier music. i find that black socks with a gold toe really give the guitars a heavy sound in mixing. whatever you do, don't wear white socks when mixing. my second fav choice, believe it or not, would be pink socks. they bring out pinch harmonics really well.
for holding your tongue the right way, i find if you just open your mouth and kinda just stick/flop your tongue out like a dog does on a hot day, it improves the recorded sound. the high frequencies hit the tongue and get stuck in the little crevaces (sp?) to really smooth out the guitar tracks. try it, and let us know how it works out. |
|
|
    |
 |
Artifex
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 04, 2006
Posts: 16
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 23, 2006 8:20 pm |
  |
I mix barefoot. Mabye this is why my mixes tend to lack 'warmth'. |
|
|
  |
 |
Davedog
Moderator

Joined: Dec 10, 2001
Posts: 2709
Location: Pacific NW
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 23, 2006 10:46 pm |
  |
Find the best speaker in the stack.
Run a multiple number of mics....three is a good number
Record several takes of the same passage
Each passage ,cut EQ particular sections of the low mids and use LESS distortion than you think it should have, decreasing this each time.
If you're on a computer, sub-bus all of these with a separate compression.
Blend to taste.
Will this make it LARGE?
try it before you answer.
Thank me later. |
_________________ da moderAtor....proprietor of drool'n dogg rekords...pope-of-recording, the spitboys church of freedom |
|
   |
 |
took-the-red-pill
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Posts: 316
Location: Near Clagary
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 23, 2006 11:24 pm |
  |
Mr Dog
Cool, I do the 3 seperate passes, but I haven't tried different levels of distortion. Good to try new things.
By the way, not to derail the topic from our questioner, but do you have approximate locations for those three mics that you like to use, and reasons for those locations? Jest curious.
Pink socks bring out the pinch harmonics? HAH!!! NEWBIE! everybody knows it's red ones that do that.
As for the high frequencies getting caught in the crevaces of your tongue...I have to go change my shorts now and clean up the puddle.
Cheers mates.
K |
_________________ Take the blue pill and you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. Take the red pill and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes...Morpheus |
|
   |
 |
RemyRAD
Moderator

Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Posts: 3619
Location: Washington DC Virginia suburbs
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 24, 2006 12:07 am |
  |
If I want a particularly big fat nasty sound, I'll sometimes use a Sennheiser MD421. It has a broader response with more articulation than the venerable SM 57 has. It's got that presence rise that adds to the crunch and a more prominent low-frequency response to make it sound twice as big as an SM 57 can.
I've always been too frightened to use my precious ribbon microphones on death metal. I'll use them on jazz guitarist. They're sweet and smooth with a great degree of accuracy.
Distortedly yours
Ms. Remy Ann David |
|
|
    |
 |
Playjerise
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 19, 2005
Posts: 16
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 24, 2006 8:09 pm |
  |
I like the idea of the 421.
When you say 3 passes - do you mean three takes?
Explain to the young and eager.
Jake |
|
|
  |
 |
Davedog
Moderator

Joined: Dec 10, 2001
Posts: 2709
Location: Pacific NW
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu May 25, 2006 6:15 pm |
  |
Passes=takes=sweat under the cans...etc.etc.
Placement of three(perhaps) mics on a guitar cabinet......
This is something that it helps to have a friend and several good sounding headphones and a decent way to plug em in at the source...in this case the said guitar amp thingy.
Your friend is going to move the mics, ONE AT A TIME, in very very small increments until you find the optimum placement for each style of mic thats set up.
Each mic has its OWN TRACK.....
I will usually have some of the standard mics for this.. In this case I would dig around in the bottom of the old mic drawer, and get out my favorite SM57. This is the very first mic I will place. Even if I NEVER USE IT IN THE MIX! Its a point of reference for me as I know exactly when it hits that spot. I then will leave it alone. NEVER TOUCH THE P.O.R. mic. If you are a second on my project and you touch the P.O.R. mic in any way, you will immediately be sent on some coffee run/scotch collection patrol, or you may have to clean the bathrooms. SO....dont touch the .....etc etc...
If its a very very heavy track and the guitar sound has a lot of bass in it, I will then put up a fast mic with lots of low-end. An ATM25 is perfect for this as would be an MD421 Senn, Electrovoice RE20, and even an AKGD112. I'm gonna have to EQ the 112 but thats what those knobs are for. Your friend is going to move this mic in small increments also.
Did I mention this will all be done while the guitarist is wanking off something fierce. I'm not talking idle wanking, but IN FACT rehearsing the part he/she is gonna play. Amazing huh. Did I also mention why the headphones? Got it yet? And did I also mention that you MUST have a way to directly talk to your friend whos out in the room endangering his hearing just so you can get that amazing guitar sound? Of course HE has the phones on......unless you have your set-up in the same room in which case you BOTH have on headphones........simple really.
When this mic is settled in and sounding like GAWDSOWNROCKSTARGITAR, then we're ready to add the 'color' to the proceedings.
I do this with a couple of special condensers. Your choice here may vary. I use an adulterated ADK A51 ModelV. Its cardioid so I tend to tilt it and off axis this one some. Realize that these mics are all in the same approximate area and you have to be able to check and change the phase if need be. A KEL HM1 sounds good in this position as will any reatively dark and accurate mic. Like I said its all about the color .
At this point your friend is really sick of listening to the wanker over and over so its beer time. You can add ANOTHER condenser. This one would be in the room and used as a mic to create size. This where I like the cheap stuff. Studio Projects B3,C3, AKG C2000, C1000, etc etc. This is also a mic that will benefit from large moves until you find a realtively good spot and then move it in smaller increments until it goes BANG...and there it is, Bob's yer uncle. Start four to six feet out and have lots of gain available. This is also a mic you can compress the HOLYBEJESUS out of. You will also have to time align this one....you can do this later as long as you dont feed it into the phones whilst the WankerKing is tracking. This can cause some confusion...and we certainly dont want the 'Star' confused...
Have fun and buy your friend a drink for doing all that moving. Remember, it only taks a silly millimeter to make or break a great guitar sound.
One other tip. Isolate the cabinet from the floor as best possible. The Auralex Pads for this work GREAT!
peaceout Dadogg |
_________________ da moderAtor....proprietor of drool'n dogg rekords...pope-of-recording, the spitboys church of freedom |
|
   |
 |
MadTiger3000
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Posts: 493
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu May 25, 2006 8:50 pm |
  |
| Davedog wrote: | Passes=takes=sweat under the cans...etc.etc.
Placement of three(perhaps) mics on a guitar cabinet......
This is something that it helps to have a friend and several good sounding headphones and a decent way to plug em in at the source...in this case the said guitar amp thingy.
Your friend is going to move the mics, ONE AT A TIME, in very very small increments until you find the optimum placement for each style of mic thats set up.
Each mic has its OWN TRACK.....
I will usually have some of the standard mics for this.. In this case I would dig around in the bottom of the old mic drawer, and get out my favorite SM57. This is the very first mic I will place. Even if I NEVER USE IT IN THE MIX! Its a point of reference for me as I know exactly when it hits that spot. I then will leave it alone. NEVER TOUCH THE P.O.R. mic. If you are a second on my project and you touch the P.O.R. mic in any way, you will immediately be sent on some coffee run/scotch collection patrol, or you may have to clean the bathrooms. SO....dont touch the .....etc etc...
If its a very very heavy track and the guitar sound has a lot of bass in it, I will then put up a fast mic with lots of low-end. An ATM25 is perfect for this as would be an MD421 Senn, Electrovoice RE20, and even an AKGD112. I'm gonna have to EQ the 112 but thats what those knobs are for. Your friend is going to move this mic in small increments also.
Did I mention this will all be done while the guitarist is wanking off something fierce. I'm not talking idle wanking, but IN FACT rehearsing the part he/she is gonna play. Amazing huh. Did I also mention why the headphones? Got it yet? And did I also mention that you MUST have a way to directly talk to your friend whos out in the room endangering his hearing just so you can get that amazing guitar sound? Of course HE has the phones on......unless you have your set-up in the same room in which case you BOTH have on headphones........simple really.
When this mic is settled in and sounding like GAWDSOWNROCKSTARGITAR, then we're ready to add the 'color' to the proceedings.
I do this with a couple of special condensers. Your choice here may vary. I use an adulterated ADK A51 ModelV. Its cardioid so I tend to tilt it and off axis this one some. Realize that these mics are all in the same approximate area and you have to be able to check and change the phase if need be. A KEL HM1 sounds good in this position as will any reatively dark and accurate mic. Like I said its all about the color .
At this point your friend is really sick of listening to the wanker over and over so its beer time. You can add ANOTHER condenser. This one would be in the room and used as a mic to create size. This where I like the cheap stuff. Studio Projects B3,C3, AKG C2000, C1000, etc etc. This is also a mic that will benefit from large moves until you find a realtively good spot and then move it in smaller increments until it goes BANG...and there it is, Bob's yer uncle. Start four to six feet out and have lots of gain available. This is also a mic you can compress the HOLYBEJESUS out of. You will also have to time align this one....you can do this later as long as you dont feed it into the phones whilst the WankerKing is tracking. This can cause some confusion...and we certainly dont want the 'Star' confused...
Have fun and buy your friend a drink for doing all that moving. Remember, it only taks a silly millimeter to make or break a great guitar sound.
One other tip. Isolate the cabinet from the floor as best possible. The Auralex Pads for this work GREAT!
peaceout Dadogg |
" One other tip. Isolate the cabinet from the floor as best possible. The Auralex Pads for this work GREAT!"
I have been playing guitar and bass for 26 years, and been a home studio recording enthusiast for about 3 years, and I have never seen this gem.
I remember why I check RO daily!!! |
|
|
  |
 |
IronGuillotine
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 29, 2006
Posts: 20
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri May 26, 2006 1:18 pm |
  |
Great thread and very good tips! |
|
|
  |
 |
Sidhu
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 22, 2004
Posts: 286
Location: New Delhi, India
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri May 26, 2006 4:42 pm |
  |
| RemyRAD wrote: |
I've always been too frightened to use my precious ribbon microphones on death metal. I'll use them on jazz guitarist. They're sweet and smooth with a great degree of accuracy.
Distortedly yours
Ms. Remy Ann David |
Remmy records death!!!! >>>> ????
Wwwwooooooooooooooo !!!!!!!
 |
|
|
  |
 |
took-the-red-pill
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Posts: 316
Location: Near Clagary
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat May 27, 2006 12:50 am |
  |
| Davedog wrote: | | This is also a mic you can compress the HOLYBEJESUS out of. You will also have to time align this one.... |
By 'time align' my newbie brain thinks you mean moving the track back 5 or 6 milliseconds so it aligns with the original mic? Is that what you mean? If so why would it be bad to have them that far apart in the old time line? Also my software, to my knowledge, will only do so to the nearest MS, and I would think that if things were a 1/4 or 1/2 MS off, they would sound pretty wonky.
Maybe I have this all wrong.
Keith |
_________________ Take the blue pill and you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. Take the red pill and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes...Morpheus |
|
   |
 |
twon
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 02, 2006
Posts: 97
Location: Melbourne, Australia
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat May 27, 2006 2:54 am |
  |
| Quote: | | By 'time align' my newbie brain thinks you mean moving the track back 5 or 6 milliseconds so it aligns with the original mic? |
yeah thats it, but you would move the room mic track forward, to compensate for the delay of the sound getting there from the amp. if they are not aligned you will get phase cancellation
twon |
|
|
  |
 |
Davedog
Moderator

Joined: Dec 10, 2001
Posts: 2709
Location: Pacific NW
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat May 27, 2006 10:58 am |
  |
Yeah....just so. You only have to worry about the room mic, and only if its obviously out of time. Shouldnt be a lot and it might be perfect dependant on placement. Afterall, the room mic is all about getting size to the track, and a few milliseconds is what you would be looking for. Time-align only needs to happen as a correction in this case and only if needs be. The phase is going to be the thing you must look out for the most with the close mics. |
_________________ da moderAtor....proprietor of drool'n dogg rekords...pope-of-recording, the spitboys church of freedom |
|
   |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| Goto page 1, 2 Next |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|