| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Recording.org PRO SHOP Categories |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 79241679 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
tundrkys
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 25, 2001
Posts: 186
Location: Port Arthur, Texas
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Jun 11, 2006 10:22 am |
  |
What does it mean again.... AMD 3700 vs AMD 4000... both at 2.0Ghz?? |
_________________ ThunderKyss |
|
  |
 |
Nirvalica
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 10, 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Sparta, NJ
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:57 pm |
  |
| tundrkys wrote: | | What does it mean again.... AMD 3700 vs AMD 4000... both at 2.0Ghz?? | the 3700 and 4000 are the model numbers. |
|
|
    |
 |
tundrkys
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 25, 2001
Posts: 186
Location: Port Arthur, Texas
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:14 am |
  |
Ok........ after a little research, I've found that while the processor speed is clearly stated... in this case 2.0Ghz.
The model numbers represent the actual performance of the AMD processor as compared to an Intel processor.
So, a 2.0Ghz model 3800 AThlon, performs like a 3.8Ghz Intel P4(if there were such a thing).
NOw...... just skimming the internet these past few days, I'm thinking this is because the AMD includes an integrated Memory controller, where the Intel does not. |
_________________ ThunderKyss |
|
  |
 |
Nirvalica
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 10, 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Sparta, NJ
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:53 am |
  |
| tundrkys wrote: | Ok........ after a little research, I've found that while the processor speed is clearly stated... in this case 2.0Ghz.
The model numbers represent the actual performance of the AMD processor as compared to an Intel processor.
So, a 2.0Ghz model 3800 AThlon, performs like a 3.8Ghz Intel P4(if there were such a thing).
NOw...... just skimming the internet these past few days, I'm thinking this is because the AMD includes an integrated Memory controller, where the Intel does not. | thats interesting. good find. |
|
|
    |
 |
sparky472
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 4
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:28 am |
  |
You are on the right track. Clock speed is only one factor in processor performance and subsequently, overall system performance. So, you are right in that the model numbering system compares performance relative to other processors clock speed ratings, and is based on the premise that other permformance optimizations - including the integrated memory controller - enhance overall performance. Indeed, AMD has consistently had better performing, more efficient processors than Intel for some time. I'm not telling you that you have to have an AMD processor to have a decent DAW. But, the benchmarks do say a lot about AMD performance. |
|
|
  |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|