| Author |
Message |
Crankitup
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 141
Location: Oakland, California
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:51 pm |
  |
Hey, I'm new here and I'm looking for a good small diaphragm cardioid microphone that would be good for acoustic guitar and ideally drums or a guitar cabinet. My budget is $500 or less. Any suggestions?
Thanks |
|
|
   |
 |
Big_D
Moderator

Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 628
Location: Philadelphia PA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:53 pm |
  |
I like SM81's for accoustic guitars and drum OH's. A little more than your budget but worth the price. |
_________________ RO DAW's & Computing Moderator |
|
  |
 |
Crankitup
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 141
Location: Oakland, California
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:59 pm |
  |
|
   |
 |
Big_D
Moderator

Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 628
Location: Philadelphia PA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:19 pm |
  |
Its all subjective so YMMV but the SM81 has been a studio standard for as long as many of us have been alive. It's very accurate on-axis, low noise and tough as nails. The NT5 is IMO the best sounding of the budget SDC's on accoustic guitar but I like the C4 better for a budget drum OH. Of course the SM81 is great on both and works well on alot of other sources as well.
BTW, that's $350 each and well worth it. |
_________________ RO DAW's & Computing Moderator |
|
  |
 |
Crankitup
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 141
Location: Oakland, California
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:47 pm |
  |
I'll check it out. I already have 2 groove tubes GT57's that I'm enjoying for drum overheads and vocals, but I can't get a good acoustic guitar sound that I like. I remember an engineer using an SM81 on my drummer's hi-hat, so I think I could find some more versatile uses for it, too. Thanks |
|
|
   |
 |
moonbaby
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Posts: 1949
Location: jacksonville,fl
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:14 am |
  |
Variety is the spice of life, my friend. Leave the GTs to the geetar amp cabs and some vocals. I have an SM81, A-T AT4041, and Rode NT5 SDCs.
I like the 81 on acoustic instruments and on hi-hats, OHs. Ditto with the 4041. The NT5 pair works great as OH's and on acoustic instruments, not so great on hi-hats (for some reason, they're just more placement-sensitive there). But the Rodes are a real workhorse SDC, and I think are a great bargain for a stereo pair. They are remeniscent of the original AKG C452EB (I used to have a pair before they were stolen ). |
|
|
  |
 |
Halifaxsoundguy
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 18, 2007
Posts: 321
Location: Halifax, NS Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:19 am |
  |
I have a nice AT-3035 that works and sounds great. Its about $300. At also has some entry level condensers, I believe their around $200 they are black in colour.
Mark |
_________________ MBOX 2 PRO FACTORY, PRO-TOOLS LE 7.3
Apple MacBook (Tiger), 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4MB shared L2 cache, 2 GB MEMORY, 120GB HD
Western Digital 250 GB EXT. HD.
KRK Rokit 8's & Reason 4.
|
|
  |
 |
bwmac
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 13, 2006
Posts: 220
Location: Alberta, Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:41 am |
  |
I keep coming back to the apex line
I own a Apex 415 and 460 and both are great entry level mics.
heres a review on the 460
http://www.studioreviews.com/m16-460.htm
Google a 460 mod, which i just recently performed on my 460 by replacing the tube.
It was a simple task, $11 can. for the tube, the noise floor dropped nicely and the presence increased.
If I want a airy crisper sound I use the 415.
both well Worth there money IMHO |
|
|
    |
 |
moonbaby
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Posts: 1949
Location: jacksonville,fl
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:29 am |
  |
Well, a decent quality SDC is invaluable for string instruments and for OH's. The SM81 is a professional staple for that application. You'd have to go with an Earthworks or DPA to get a perceptible improvement in audio quality, and even then, you're dealing with a mic that's at least twice (or in the case of the DPA, 4 times) the price. While a good LDC can yield decent results on acoustic guitar, they tend to sound "tubby" in the low end range on a lot of instruments because that's the range they were developed to emphasize. And when you add the brightness boost a lot of the Chinese LDCs are designed to emphasize, you have a real mess.
I used to use LDCs for OH's, but have found that a pair of (or even a single) SDC will yield a more "focused" and transparent sound, without the phase anomalies an LDC would introduce, especially with muli-mic'd drum kits, especially in respect to the tom mics. |
|
|
  |
 |
Link555
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 31, 2007
Posts: 820
Location: North Vancouver
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:42 am |
  |
I have few choices for acoustic 'geetar's', One of my favorite combos is a Apex 460 (modded new capsule, tube and transformer) and a Rode NT1(not the new NT1A the older version).
But I agree wih the SM81, everytime I have had a chance to use them on guitar they worked well. |
_________________ Did you Hear that?
www.steller-studios.com |
|
   |
 |
jonyoung
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 31, 2003
Posts: 773
Location: Nashville, TN
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:14 am |
  |
I know it's not a small diaphram mic, but AT4050 is my alltime favorite on acoustic. |
|
|
   |
 |
bwmac
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 13, 2006
Posts: 220
Location: Alberta, Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:23 pm |
  |
I can't disagree with Big_D or Moonbaby about the SM81.
heres a good review on it. |
|
|
    |
 |
bwmac
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 13, 2006
Posts: 220
Location: Alberta, Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:24 pm |
  |
I can't disagree with Big_D or Moonbaby about the SM81.
heres a good review on it.
http://www.tweakheadz.com/review_of_the_SM81.htm
and yes that LDC 460 is very fat on the bottom end with a high
noise floor but the mod fixes that.
The review compares the SM81 to the SM57 so I guess its never a waist.
Personally, as a guitar player, I hate a mic that has to be to close, now I don't know but the review said 5 inches and that's intruding in my space as a performer. so I use a 415 when I want a crisp acoustic sound.
Anyway, choosing a mic is a personal thing and only you will know what is best for your situation so I will leave you all with a recording that I used the Apex 415 on. It was used for the vox and the guitar, and the noise floor is a bit high from the 460 that was unmoded at the time and placed two feet back for natural verb; but I'm still an armature with no professional training, and I know I have a long way to go, thats why I'm here.
the song is maybe somehow
maybe somehow |
|
|
    |
 |
Link555
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 31, 2007
Posts: 820
Location: North Vancouver
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 18, 2007 5:01 pm |
  |
Actually I find the stock APEX 460 a little weak in the low end area. But I found changing the capsule and transformer helped that. Changing the tube lower the gain and harshness of the mic. The quality control the apex mics is almost non-existent, but if you’re willing to tweak a bit you can spend 1K and end up with a 5k mic IMO. |
_________________ Did you Hear that?
www.steller-studios.com |
|
   |
 |
|
|