| Author |
Message |
cathode_ray
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: May 03, 2007
Posts: 90
Location: Atlanta
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon May 07, 2007 10:43 am |
  |
How do "YOU" do this? When I try to double, it's real obvious it 2 takes. I'm not a great singer but competent enough to come close - they just don't merge...
Is most doubling just track "copy and delay"? How do you pan them?
How much value in 2 actual(as opposed to virtual ) tracks. |
|
|
  |
 |
fourone3
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 17, 2007
Posts: 153
Location: Massachusetts
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon May 07, 2007 3:11 pm |
  |
I personally double voice (or guitar, etc) to get that sound - the obvious two takes ... the nuances that each take has adds to the overall mix. I've never had great luck copying and pasting, then delaying/nudging the track - mainly because I like the obvious doubled sound.
Are you trying to double the entire track, or just parts?
Panning depends on where it fits in the track, where you want the song to go, etc. It's subjective if you ask me. |
_________________ Admit nothing; deny everything; make counter accusations. - "I didn't do it. Nothing happened. What did YOU do?!" |
|
  |
 |
arnieguitar
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 31, 2006
Posts: 20
Location: SE Wisconsin
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue May 08, 2007 11:09 am |
  |
Well, The Beatles sure did it well.
Most of their early hits were all doubled vocals.
I've never done it, but isn't it just singing along with your original part as closely as possible?
I mean, just monitor through the headphones and record on another track using the same setup? |
_________________ Failure is not falling down,
Failure is not getting back up.
My Music: http://www.myspace.com/arnieguida |
|
  |
 |
1000heads
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Posts: 17
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 09, 2007 2:18 am |
  |
when doubling voices, a singer/vocalist/mc can harmonize with themselves, giving themselvesa wider spectrum of sound. |
|
|
  |
 |
Seedlings
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Sep 13, 2005
Posts: 101
Location: Kansas City, MO
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 09, 2007 8:52 am |
  |
If you can actually get one great take, I'm impressed!
One thing you might try is to take that one great take, copy it, and on that copy add a phaser or flanger effect. Pan one hard right and the other hard left. Used VERY sparingly it's cool.
I like cool.
CHAD |
_________________ CHAD |
|
  |
 |
cathode_ray
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: May 03, 2007
Posts: 90
Location: Atlanta
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 09, 2007 10:40 am |
  |
Singing harmony is easy. It's the unison voices I struggle with. The slightest variation in pitch causes modulation. If I get it right it causes adulation(LoL).
I guess when you're as accomplished as J. Lennon it's a bit different. But also didn't Emerick(or N Smith) devise an auto-doubler early on? |
|
|
  |
 |
patrick_like_static
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 417
Location: Springfield, Missouri, USA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 09, 2007 1:19 pm |
  |
It's timing issues more than pitch issues that bother me in doubling vocals. Twisted Lemon makes a free VST side-chain gate/expander called SideKick, and it might improve your results to set the best vocal take as the key with a slowish (30 ms, maybe) opening time. This way you won't (theoretically) hear any of the doubles until the main one kicks in.
I say theoretically only because I've had some consistency issues with the plug-in, but this could be user error more than programming. |
|
|
  |
 |
CombatWombat
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Dec 17, 2004
Posts: 174
Location: Portland, Or
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri May 11, 2007 7:38 pm |
  |
I really love the sound of doubled vocals...on the right music of course. I have had good results doubling my own vocals and panning hard left and right for that big, obvious double tracked sound, but when I try to mix my doubled vocals down the center for a more subtle sound...yikes...it sounds pretty bad.
Any advice for mixing doubled vocals panned center? I know it pretty much comes down to the quality of the performance, but I'd appreciate any tips. |
_________________ From A Basement On the Hill |
|
    |
 |
pollysix
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Posts: 34
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 23, 2007 11:50 am |
  |
A couple of things re: doubling vocals
- Doubling is different from harmonies. A standard way to do it is: double the lead (i.e. union), and then add harmonies seperately.
Some tricks for good doubles:
- "Real" doubles sound better than copy-paste ones.
- Watch it with your "fricatives" and "plosives" etc. ...i.e. sing the lead how you sing it, but for the double hold back or omitt sounds like T, P, F. an example of this would be with a phrase that ends in the word "want"---the lead pronounces the "T" but the doubling voice just sings "wan". This is way if you're double isn't bang-on, you won't hear two voices pronounce the "T" sound.
- If you're not so confident with your vocals, you can always sink the double into the background afterwards, or even triple it. If need be you can apply pitch correction to it and it won't be as noticable because it's in the background.
- I've always found that it helps to have the playback level of the original lead vocal be slightly louder when I'm tracking the double---that way I'm like a backing vocalist: shadowing the lead voice and making sure I blend in rather than strike out new turf.
- Finally, doing good doubles just takes practice. You need to know your material, but also have a mental map of the original performance that you're doubling--where the main breaths are, any little frilly bits. Spend a bit of time listening back and singing along with the lead track before you attempt it.
Good luck.
Oh yes, then there's the whole question of aesthetics and when it sounds best to use them... but that's another kettle of fish. |
|
|
  |
 |
maintiger
Respected Past Moderator

Joined: Dec 3, 2003
Posts: 2342
Location: Whittier, California, USA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun May 27, 2007 7:17 pm |
  |
you need to listen to the original vocal and sing along with it until you have down the nuances of the performance, then sing and try to get it as close as possible. If you are having trouble getting certain places close, try doing several takes of the double and then comping them. You can always copy and paste passages from the original vocals as needed, but a new version sounds way more cool. |
_________________ Xavier Calvera R.O. Vocal Booth Moderator
www.lordtiger.com
Check out what I am working on at http://www.myspace.com/elrodgeare |
|
    |
 |
Dozer
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Nov 21, 2006
Posts: 50
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 30, 2007 7:28 pm |
  |
pollysix hit it right on. Most people have problems with the fractives and plosives, If your trying to get the original and double right on, the plosives and fractives will be difficult to get right on.
But with practice, you can only get better of course.
I Overdub my main vocals in all my track. I keep them at the same level
(I dont bring one down about 6 decibels or so, which is one method)
One Take to the Left about 5% and the Overdub of me saying the same thing to the right about 5%
Take a listen to one of my tracks on my myspace page, link in my sig
, all vocals are overdubbed. "ALL"
If I record a vocal, I do at least one overdub. But my overdubs are so similar, one may think I just added some delay or something. |
_________________ www.myspace.com/dagspotsoldier
Up'n My Knowledge Everyday |
|
  |
 |
Link555
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 31, 2007
Posts: 738
Location: Soon to be North Vancouver
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 12:05 am |
  |
About the headphone level thing. Experiment! I have worked with many artists that have better pitch when the headphone level of first vocal is lower than their monitor level during that take. Yet I have also had singers who seem to like it exactly opposite. Most times when the pitch is off, I try shifting their monitor mix until they start hitting the pitches. The human ear is very complex and how a singer hears the music, 1st vocal and themselves greatly affects their ability to hit the notes. Most people are not conscious of this, which makes our job a little trickier. Sorry but there no quick fix, everyone is unique. You will have to experiment with the levels and see what works for you. |
_________________ Did you Hear that?
www.steller-studios.com |
|
   |
 |
cathode_ray
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: May 03, 2007
Posts: 90
Location: Atlanta
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 2:31 pm |
  |
" Most times when the pitch is off, I try shifting their monitor mix until they start hitting the pitches. " Thanx !
Yes, I seem to have better luck by listening to myself(pull phones off 1 ear) sometimes. I don't have comprehensive monitor capabilities...
I expect REAL GOOD singers don't have this problem ... |
|
|
  |
 |
pollysix
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Posts: 34
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 5:59 pm |
  |
| cathode_ray wrote: | " Most times when the pitch is off, I try shifting their monitor mix until they start hitting the pitches. " Thanx !
Yes, I seem to have better luck by listening to myself(pull phones off 1 ear) sometimes. I don't have comprehensive monitor capabilities...
I expect REAL GOOD singers don't have this problem ... |
Yes, it's easier in general to sing on key when you can hear a bit of yourself in the room. I often wear the headphones half-on on both sides (I find it weird not hearing the stereo). But as people above said, it's all a matter of what works for you---every singer is so different. |
|
|
  |
 |
DRDLKS
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Aug 20, 2007
Posts: 15
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:22 pm |
  |
Doubling anything is a performance. Once you get a good solid track down that you like. That really only becomes your starting scratch track that the vocalist or guitarist will follow.
So after you get that first scratch. Have the vocalist doube that. Then if that one is better dump the first and move on to doubling the new Scratch. Keep doing this until you get 2 near perfect performances. THis shoul donly go on for about 5-6 times.
The singer will learn the small tweaks and turns he/she made and actually become better and better because of it.
Also you can pan R or L and go that way or go center with both and just drop the send track under the first. Just to thicken up the track. Put a nice simple delay or reverb on that send track to make it sound bigger
Or do a single and just ignore the troubles =) |
|
|
  |
 |
|
|