| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Pro Shop Random Audio Product |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 76721342 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| PASS IT ON! Please link back to RO |
| |
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
ORSUP
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: 6
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:16 pm |
  |
I have been debating about this with myself for a bit and decided to ask the crew here what your opinions are.
This is the path I use for recording VOCALS.
After my mic I currently use a tube pre-amp to a Digitech Studio 4 (for a bit of compression) then send a stereo signal out to my DAW. I have found that the stereo signal is much nicer and fuller when I send the signal to the DAW stereo. So I use a STEREO vocal track to work with.
Does any one have preferences or is this out of the norm? I would really appreciate some feedback.
B |
|
|
  |
 |
Boswell
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 19, 2006
Posts: 1020
Location: UK
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:52 am |
  |
If you prefer the sound of the stereo vocal track, go with it. You are presumably mixing down to a 2-track CD with the vocals nominally centred anyway, so it makes little difference to subsequent processing. |
|
|
  |
 |
TVPostSound
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Posts: 625
Location: Burbank, CA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:28 am |
  |
From your description, you are not stereo!!
Its a double mono. |
|
|
  |
 |
Cucco
Moderator

Joined: Mar 8, 2004
Posts: 4275
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:17 pm |
  |
Here's a good way to see if you're actually stereo or not (and my guess is you're not...you're probably dual mono as TVPS states).
Take your stereo track and reverse the phase on only one side of the stereo track. If the sound goes away...double mono. If the sound changes but doesn't completely disappear...you're stereo. The latter is very unlikely (unless you're feeding it out of a reverb box too).
Cheers -
J. |
_________________ www.myspace.com/sublymerecords
www.sublymerecords.com
|
|
     |
 |
ORSUP
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: 6
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:48 pm |
  |
Both good points. I will try that. |
|
|
  |
 |
BobRogers
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 1178
Location: Blacksburg, VA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:51 pm |
  |
If it turns out you are in dual mono, so you are in a situation that shouldn't sound different, but does...the answer usually turns out to be that one setting is slightly louder than the other for some odd reason. Easiest way to fool yourself on A/B comparisons is not to match the volumes exactly (and darn tough to do right). |
|
|
   |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|