| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Recording.org PRO SHOP Categories |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 79193709 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
cotenyc
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 09, 2005
Posts: 57
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:36 pm |
  |
Hey all,
I'm a long time Sonar user (on 7 PE now), and it has been great..
but I'm considering switching over to Cubase 4.
To my ears Cubase has a better stereo field, more depth and it seems to handle everything with more grace.. anyone else notice this?
I have an offer to buy Cubase used... is this a problem for registration or activation?
It comes with everything (usb key, book, etc.etc.), great price$!
Also, does Cubase let you have per-project folders like Sonar does?
Any feedback, gotcha's are welcomed. |
|
|
  |
 |
lambchop
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 14, 2003
Posts: 182
Location: New Jersey (right outside the Big Apple!)
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:42 pm |
  |
I use Cubase (SX2 to be precise). Steinberg allows for transfer of registrations and I believe there is a nominal charge, like $35, at the time of the transfer. You can probably find out more information over at their website http://www.steinberg.de/24_0.html (if you can't read German remember to click the "English" button on the upper right hand side).
I actually purchased my software copy used years back and the person I bought it from took care of the transfer. |
|
|
    |
 |
leedsquietman
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Sep 01, 2005
Posts: 94
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:13 pm |
  |
The sound quality is going to be the same if using the same plugins and pan law.
I agree with you that Cubase's interface is better but having said that, I grew up on Cubase since VST 3.5 so I have a bias. Sonar is too cramped and muddled imho but I do admire the great fx they bundled in 6 and 7PE.
The licenses can be transferred by contacting the distributor which is Yamaha in the USA. If the person transferring the license lives outside of the USA you will have to pay an additional fee to have your product registered as USA product.
http://www.steinberg.net/320+M52087573ab0.html |
|
|
  |
 |
dterry
Moderator

Joined: Apr 13, 2006
Posts: 121
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:11 am |
  |
| cotenyc wrote: |
Also, does Cubase let you have per-project folders like Sonar does?
Any feedback, gotcha's are welcomed. |
Certainly. You can also save a project to a new folder if desired, copying any audio with it. You can set the record folder anywhere you want (it defaults to the Audio folder in the project folder you setup). |
|
|
   |
 |
nadavnaz
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 3
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:55 am |
  |
As someone with no previous background with cubase/sonar in particular(I used some freeware stuff.. horrible!), I'd recommend the switch to cubase. I'm using sx3, and Have tried sonar 7 at a friend, and cubase 3 seems way cleaner, organization oriented, and more professional. The project file pool commands are great, maintaining a clean and organized workspace folder.
And in general, the interface is flawless, customizable, and... Clean!
I'd definitely switch  |
|
|
  |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|