| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Pro Shop Random Audio Product |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 77192285 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| PASS IT ON! Please link back to RO |
| |
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
JoEllis
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Oct 26, 2006
Posts: 2
Location: South Africa
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:48 am |
  |
I've been wanting to build my own broadband absorption panels for my new studio and I've seen a lot of DIY projects on the internet, but they all use rockwool. I live in South Africa and (as far as I know) rockwool isn't that easy to get here. We have an insulation product here called Isotherm that is very similar to polyester batting. It is sold in 2" thicknesses.
Would it work for a broadband absorber if I'm able to compress several layers of this in each panel (2'X4') and then cover it in cheesecloth or similar material?
Any opinions or advice would be appreciated.
EDIT: BTW, like almost all houses here, all the walls in my studio are concrete. |
|
|
   |
 |
Ethan Winer
Respected Past Moderator

Joined: Mar 19, 2001
Posts: 3188
Location: New Milford, CT USA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:25 pm |
  |
Maybe. The only way to know is to see absorption data, or measure that yourself to compare it to known-good materials. Do you have a link to that product?
--Ethan |
_________________ www.realtraps.com
The acoustic treatment experts |
|
   |
 |
MadMax
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 18, 2001
Posts: 1271
Location: Sunny & warm NC
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:34 pm |
  |
Just out of curiosity (and a side comment)....
My gut tells me that the Isotherm insulation product is very close to what we have here in the states with "pink fluffy" insulation.
One measure of whether to even attempt to use it for broadband absorbtion, is to weigh it. Approximation will likely be good enough.
Standard home insulation is in the area of less than 1 pound per cubic foot, with Owens Corning 703 running about 3 pounds per cubic foot.
IOW... if it isn't very dense, it probably won't be too effective for use in a broadband absorber.
The thought of compressing several layers of a low density insulation, to make an effective absorber is not as easy as you would think...
A more expanded discussion can be found here: http://www.recording.org/ftopict-38238-.html
However, I have no doubt that there is an effective insulation material in your country that would do the job... it may just take some extra digging to find a source. |
_________________ The insanity can be seen in bigger pix and greater detail at: http://www.dmmobile.com
"A committee is a cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled." -- Sir Barnett Cocks (1907 - 1989) |
|
    |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|