| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Pro Shop Random Audio Product |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 76946955 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| PASS IT ON! Please link back to RO |
| |
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
lostindundee
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Posts: 30
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 12:36 pm |
  |
Hi there
This could have been posted on the Studio Construction board but it relates more to home studio stuff I guess.
Although I'm currently using a DI to go through my preamp for guitars and bass, I would also like to record straight from several combos I have using a mic up against the speaker in order to get different varieties regarding sound. However, I do not want to make enemies of my neighbours and have been thinking of various ways around this.
One that I've come up with is to use a large Dog Cage that my girlfriend owns. She has no use for it now having only used it once for transporting a dog. I think it's around 5ft x 3ft x 3ft in size.
I was thinking that a moderately sized combo could fit inside it. I have a small Marshall (guitar) combo and a small Fender (bass) combo which could be easily miced inside this cage with some sort of sound proofing on the outside of the cage and underneath.
Having not tried this yet, I was wondering what your opinions would be on the sound I would get recorded in this kind of enclosed space? Is it worth shelling out the cash on soundproofing materials and experimenting with this setup or is it an idea that sucks?
Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.
LiD |
|
|
  |
 |
hueseph
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Posts: 1467
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 1:08 pm |
  |
|
   |
 |
Space
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 1195
Location: Exit 4, Alabama
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 5:40 pm |
  |
I'd sale the dog cage, it's worth more to you as a dog cage then as a support structure to attach MDF or your purchased dense product to.
If you move forward with the diy project, you will get better results from glue and nail/screw the panels together anyway.
Also, it is still desirable to develop enclosures for audio, big rooms down to little boxes, in a rectangular fashion. |
|
|
   |
 |
pr0gr4m
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 09, 2005
Posts: 1110
Location: South Florida
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 8:40 pm |
  |
what about a powersoak? |
_________________ I'm a program from a User that knows Alan. |
|
   |
 |
lostindundee
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Posts: 30
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu May 22, 2008 5:00 pm |
  |
Hi there
Thanks for the replies and ideas. Much appreciated.
In principal and regarding sound capacity, I'm getting the consensus that my idea would work. Great!!!
The 2 small combos I was going to use in the cage are solid state. However, the things I'm reading seem to be highlighting that it should be tubes that are run hard between the amp and stages cab. Is this correct?
Unfortunately, apart from being solid state, my combos don't have the option for going through a cab. The ones I intended using were a Marshall MG30 DFX and a Fender Rumble. I was just wanting to experiment with them to see what difference (if any) could be achieved instead of recording via DI. You never know until you try I guess.
pr0gr4m, I think given my current capacity (limited by combos), an iso cab or powersoak isn't what I'd use but I'm definitely intrigued and intend referring back this thread whenever I experiment with more ballsy sounds...lol
I know it would take a lot of work to sound proof the dog cage. The appeal for me was the capacity to temporarily sound proof it, use it, unsoundproof it when finished and be able to collapse the cage into its 4" thick depth for storage. I do agree that a brand new need-specific build as outlined by Space and Hueseph would be best.
Thanks again people. Great advice on here as ever.
LiD |
|
|
  |
 |
Kapt.Krunch
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: 406
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri May 23, 2008 6:49 am |
  |
| lostindundee wrote: | | In principal and regarding sound capacity, I'm getting the consensus that my idea would work. Great!!!LiD |
Ummm...I think the consensus was that it was not such a nifty thing, and more trouble than it's worth....but no matter.
You gotta ask yourself one question. Can you make it so it doesn't rattle any parts with that bass amp in there? Well, can you...?
If it's foldable, it will have slightly loose parts. How practical is it going to be to remove the top, bottom and all sides of whatever "soundproofing" material to store it, and then reinstall?
How are you going to make soundtight joints with removeable material?
It will probably not do a bass amp sound any favors by sticking it in a small box. I doubt you'd be able to turn it up much, or you'll have that "Rumble" rumbling. Might as well just stick it in a closet, if you can't turn it up anyway. Low frequencies need room to propagate properly. Read up on wave lengths. You'll likely have a nasty sounding "boom box".
How practical is it to seal up all your amp controls in a box, so you can't tweak them easily? A speaker inside, ran from the speaker jacks on amps, is a much better bet, if you insist on doing this.
Kapt.Krunch
(Trying not to "rattle your cage") |
|
|
  |
 |
hueseph
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Posts: 1467
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri May 23, 2008 9:55 am |
  |
Yeah. Read my post again. I think you will end up spending more money on a DIY than if you bought one. |
_________________ 'We're all too concerned about the mistakes. Leave in the mistakes! It's only rock and roll man'-Eddy Kramer(paraphrased) |
|
   |
 |
lostindundee
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Posts: 30
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri May 23, 2008 2:45 pm |
  |
| Kapt.Krunch wrote: |
(Trying not to "rattle your cage") |
Ha ha ha
You're absolutely right. I never thought about the moving parts on the cage. Doh!!! I never gave much thought to the issue of making effective soundproofing that would be re/installable without a fuss either. I guess it would also add to the storage issue.
I think you're right hueseph....I would definitely go with this when I get hold of a decent amp, providing I'm still intent on trying this. It seems a lot less hassle with an iso box.
I'll have to stop reading and replying to posts when I'm tired from work.
Thanks everyone
LiD |
|
|
  |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|