| Author |
Message |
bigtree
RO Admin

Joined: Mar 20, 2000
Posts: 4352
Location: Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 09, 2002 6:44 pm |
  |
Which two (2) mics produce the best results for you when recording an acoustic guitar?
Please Note: while I was rushing to update a mic name (just after the mass mail out) I lost a few votes, this does not taint the poll, it simply just didn't record them. Sorry, this is my first crack at it. If it alows you to enter the "Vote Now" again, it's because you were one of the 20 I lost. Vote Again If your vote was "Other" please share your reason and or mic(s) you use. |
_________________ Cheers!
|
|
   |
 |
Paul Schubert
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: 6
Location: OH
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 09, 2002 9:00 pm |
  |
Great Poll.
Unfortunately I haven't had the time or pleasure to use all of the mentioned microphones. Therefore my response is subjective.
I may never really know the BEST two mics for recording acoustic guitar. |
|
|
   |
 |
groundcontrol
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: May 30, 2001
Posts: 87
Location: Montreal, Canada.
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 09, 2002 9:36 pm |
  |
Most of my favorite a/g mics are not even there! :confused: |
|
|
    |
 |
bigtree
RO Admin

Joined: Mar 20, 2000
Posts: 4352
Location: Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 09, 2002 10:33 pm |
  |
groundcontrol, what mics are they? We will include them in a future Poll.
We will be doing the preamps next... |
_________________ Cheers!
|
|
   |
 |
bette
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 22, 2001
Posts: 36
Location: Cologne, Germany
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 3:33 am |
  |
Hi Chris,
same problem as groundcontrol, here is my favourite (not in the list too):
Schoeps MK2S
The Schoeps are fantastic for acoustic guitar.
Christoph |
_________________ Christoph Bette
mango studios
Cologne, Germany |
|
   |
 |
Steve Hudson
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 14, 2002
Posts: 18
Location: Austin, Texas
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 4:15 am |
  |
My faves aren't on the list. I use a 460 at the neck and a Soundelux U95s on the body. Killer combintion. Pre's make a big difference, too. |
_________________ Steve "Hud" Hudson
Echo Bluff Studio
Austin, Texas |
|
  |
 |
dave-G
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Nov 16, 2001
Posts: 25
Location: Florida Bay Area via California Bay Area
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 5:24 am |
  |
My fave ain't there either. The Sennheiser MKH-80 ... Deeee-licious!
And what's with the 0% (0) mics getting the long bargraph on the results? :confused:
--dg
*******************
dg, I don't see that? Maybe refresh or something.
bigtree |
|
|
  |
 |
mwagener
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 14, 2001
Posts: 40
Location: Nashville, TN
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 6:03 am |
  |
It will be different for each guitar but my favs are:
GrooveTubes AM 40
Schoeps CMC5/MK4 |
_________________ Michael Wagener
Double Trouble Productions, Inc.
WireWorld Studio |
|
  |
 |
Ed Kinsella
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 13, 2002
Posts: 22
Location: London
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 6:10 am |
  |
Hi guy,
Am new to the forum but I love it
I have not used all those mics by any means, but I have had good results with c414 (lovely) and calrec 2050's
just my $0.02 worth. |
|
|
    |
 |
Fletcher
Respected Past Moderator

Joined: Feb 10, 2001
Posts: 777
Location: Foxboro, MA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 6:57 am |
  |
I'm afraid this whole idea is quite ridiculous... as it doens't take the player, the instrument, the song, nor the environment into account. Without those elements included (as well as they myriad of transduction devices that have been omitted from the survey), I would have to say that this is at best a 'popularity contest', and at worst a 'marketing referendum'. |
|
|
   |
 |
Ed Kinsella
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 13, 2002
Posts: 22
Location: London
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 7:21 am |
  |
whoa man, thats a little harsh really, surely this represents votes on kit that has produced good results for us in the past. I think it is safe to assume that we are all big enough and ugly enough to take the poll with a pinch of salt and use it in the way it was intended. After all, there is no such thing as too much information, the art is in the weight applied to each idea. |
|
|
    |
 |
mgod
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jun 12, 2001
Posts: 6
Location: Los Angeles
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 8:36 am |
  |
I voted for a KM254, my fave for pop-style acoustics, and other. The other is a pair of EAR mics in a Blumlein setup - most people who have heard this will have heard it on the Ry Cooder/Vishwa Mohan Bhatt collaboration "A Meeting By The River."
DS |
_________________ ...and nothing to get hung about. |
|
   |
 |
bigtree
RO Admin

Joined: Mar 20, 2000
Posts: 4352
Location: Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 10:31 am |
  |
| Quote: | Originally posted by Fletcher:
I'm afraid this whole idea is quite ridiculous... as it doens't take the player, the instrument, the song, nor the environment into account. Without those elements included (as well as they myriad of transduction devices that have been omitted from the survey), I would have to say that this is at best a 'popularity contest', and at worst a 'marketing referendum'. | <img border="0" alt="[retard]" title="" src="graemlins/retard.gif" /> |
_________________ Cheers!
|
|
   |
 |
Kurtstudio
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 16, 2002
Posts: 15
Location: Franklin,TN
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 10:56 am |
  |
I have found that this combination works the best.
1. AT 4051 small diaaphram mic. Calrac pre/eq with 10 db 12k, 4 db at 8 k, 1 db at 160, :w: roll off 60 htz. Red 3 compressor set to fast attack. and release.
2. BK small diaphram mic . 1272 Neve pre with red 3 comression set on medium attact and medium release.
Set the mic's at 90 degrees use the AT to get you accack and the BK to get your tone. You can reverse the mics and compressors also, I've found different acc. gtrs. to speek in either setup. |
_________________ Later, Kurt
Kurtstudio@aol.com
615-794-3035 Studio |
|
    |
 |
kip gynn
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 10, 2002
Posts: 1
Location: OH
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 10, 2002 11:01 am |
  |
I had nice results in a live amplifed recording situation simply using a Tram mic. This mic, used with the PZM adapter close to the neck and hanging slightly over the body opening, gave consistent signal to noise without the variable proximity effect of microphones mounted on stands away from the guitar. |
|
|
   |
 |
|
|