| Author |
Message |
allenk
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Aug 30, 2006
Posts: 12
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:05 am |
  |
I will be purchasing the shure ksm44 or the rode nt 1a. Big price difference, but forget about price. Which one would you choose?
Is there someone out there who has had experience with these mics that might be able to give there impression on sound quality.  |
|
|
  |
 |
AudioGaff
Moderator

Joined: Feb 23, 2001
Posts: 2597
Location: Silicon Valley
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:54 pm |
  |
You don;t mention what your intentions are for those specific mics. So, one is not clearly better than the other because the source and the room the mic is used in also determines which is the best mic.
I've used Rode mics a few times but I am not a fan of theirs. Not that they are bad, there are just other mics I would much rather own and use.
The Shure KSM44 is good workhorse mic. If you don't own any decent mic's or need a good general purpose workhorse mic, the KSM44 would be a good choice. There are of course other good general mics as well to choose from. |
_________________ - AudioGaff -
RO Pro Audio Moderator |
|
  |
 |
Bently
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jun 03, 2007
Posts: 13
Location: Greenwood SC
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:13 pm |
  |
I own and use a couple Rode NT1a's..... I love em, now with that said.....IMO, they are very very transparent mics, not alot of coloration of the source material, very lil "warmth". they are also very quite and very sensitive.... I use them alot on vocals threw tube pre amps (to give it some body and soul...not to mention the lacking warmth) and love the way they sound on most voices with a lil touch of "PRE-TAPE" EQ.... Thats my $0.02, hope it helps! |
|
|
  |
 |
Imago
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 25, 2006
Posts: 43
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:03 pm |
  |
I have not had much experience with the nt1-A, but I do have 2 ntk's and for most applications I preferr my Ksm-44 over the ntk's. For the money it's a great mic all-round mic.  |
_________________ [quote]Yeah, sure the Sony c800g would be better, but even better still would be to make a microphone from the stretched tympanic memberanes from unicorns. It and the ELAM 251 are likely to be the only mics more expensive than the Sony.
[/quote |
|
  |
 |
sheet
Moderator

Joined: May 28, 2003
Posts: 902
Location: Kansas City, KS
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:04 pm |
  |
Shure's are good. I used 44s, 32s and the pencil mics for live and recording applications. Recorded Junior Brown's dialog for the Buddy Lee Jeans commercial on the 44. 44s are versatile.
Too pricey from the wrong dealer. |
|
|
    |
 |
Cucco
Moderator

Joined: Mar 8, 2004
Posts: 4284
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:16 am |
  |
|
     |
 |
tifftunes
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 13, 2003
Posts: 147
Location: L.A.
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:40 am |
  |
I too have enjoyed Rode mics.
However, the Shure is a (ahem) sure thing! It is one of the few mics, at any price, which is versatile enough to serve both female AND male voices well, and acoustic guitars, horns, piano, and as a single overhead on drums, etc...
As good as the the NT1-A is, I don't see it being able to cover the same territory. |
_________________ "Those who will give up a little liberty for a little control will lose both and deserve neither."
- Benjamin Franklin |
|
  |
 |
|
|