RECORDINGhttp://realtraps.com  
Our Sponsors
Pro Audio Products

Contact Us

Recording.org
PRO SHOP
Categories
· Accessories
· Compressors / Limiters / Gates
· Equalizers
· Micing Systems & Spitters
· Microphones
· Mixers/ Consols
· Modular Rack Systems
· Monitor
· Preamps
· Processors
· Recording Channels
· Summing Amps
Pro Shop
Random Audio Product

PQ Mastering Edition
$13,111.00
Members Support
RO CLUB
You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now!
User Info, Site Stats
We received
79775625
page views since March 15, 2004
Recording Org
Navigation Map
recording.jpg HomeShow/Hide content
Access restricted to our members Feedback (contact us)
tree-L.gif Recommend Us
· Advertise Here
keyword ads
· Feeds
forums1.jpg DiscussionsShow/Hide content
tree-T.gif Forum RULES
tree-T.gif Forum Search
tree-T.gif Your Account
tree-L.gif Lost Password
pronews.gif Business SectionShow/Hide content
tree-T.gif NewsNew content !
tree-T.gif Topics
Access restricted to our members Submit News
· AdvertisingShow/Hide content
Access restricted to our members Advertising Contact UsShow/Hide content
tree-T.gif keyword ads
tree-L.gif Pro Audio
Linking System
Access restricted to our members Feedback (contact us)
Access restricted to our members News Search
· The Pro Shop
Gear 4 Sale
icon_poll.gif ContentShow/Hide content
tree-T.gif Reviews & Features
tree-T.gif Stories Archive
Access restricted to our members Music_Business_Links
icon_members.gif InfoShow/Hide content
fleche.gif Books
tree-T.gif FAQ
Access restricted to our members Feedback (contact us)
fleche.gif Glossary
tree-T.gif Recommend Us
tree-T.gif Statistics
Access restricted to our members News Search
tree-T.gif Surveys
tree-L.gif Your Account
Latest Survey
Buying gear direct, would you support this?

YES, save me 10/20/40% and buy gear direct
No, add extra shipping costs, add dealer profit



Results
Polls

Votes: 226
Comments: 8
Mix News
·Harman International Teams Up with Quincy Jones
·Sonnox Adjusts Oxford Plug-In Prices
·eMusic Reports 250 Million MP3 Downloads
·Soundcheck Nashville
·Road-Worthy Gear: New Sound Reinforcement Products, December 2008

read more...©
  Forum FAQ    Search    Profile    Log in to check your private messages    Log in
  Your url ad could be here!

 
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Moxioron
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 14


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:40 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Hi all.

I am working on some songs that have a lot of high gain guitar tracks and I also want to bring out the bass. However, I am having some trouble getting around the muddy sound.

Any ideas or techniques that bring out the bass guitar and high gain guitar with out them sounding to 'muddy' post recording?

Thanks for your input.


Last edited by Moxioron on Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profileSend private message
Link555
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Mar 31, 2007
Posts: 863
Location: North Vancouver


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:56 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

roll of the lower frequiences on the guitars (everything below say 300hz ) but maybe post a clip.

_________________
www.steller-studios.com
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
RemyRAD
Moderator



Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Posts: 3609
Location: Washington DC Virginia suburbs


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:25 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

To get more bass, you need less bass and some limiting. I generally don't add bass to bass guitars unless it's a crappy sounding bass. Of course if your chainsaw electric guitars are rich, too rich in bass, it's fighting the electric bass. So either choose one from column A or one from column B. I have a motorcycle, a van & a big truck. I can only drive one at a time. Although I can put the motorcycle in the big truck. I can't put the van in the big truck nor can I put the motorcycle in the van. Catch 22? Welcome to life and recordings.

One of the things that does work to make the bass more obvious is to add second harmonic distortion to it. Don't have any second harmonic distortion handy? OK, try some third harmonic distortion. How? A little overload on an amplifier can go a long way. Not to the point where it sounds crunchy but just till it sounds a little more dense. Which is only a couple of percent of distortion not 90% distortion. But this might not be an option for you? In that respect, a little limiting and equalization might be the limit?

One track mind.
Ms. Remy Ann David
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailAIM Address
drstudio
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 52


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:45 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

I totally agree Remy,
I recently sold a late 60's Ampeg SVT with the 8x10 Cab. It was the bomb for tracking, or re micing the recorded direct signal. Depending on the amount of distortion I wanted to add, I would hot patch input 1 to input 2 and drive it a bit harder. Using a 421 or even a 57... and sometimes a large diaphram condenser ie; 87, 193, 414 etc.
distortion is your friend when used the right way.

Another note on your High Gain guitar tracks. Sometimes less is more with the amount of gain you use on your amp, try backing it off a bit. It can sometimes help increase the size of the guitar sound and it can sound a little less mucky.
As for EQ, I find a lot of younger "engineers" boost to much in around 200hz, then again around 2 or 3k. If listen to bands like Queens of the Stone Age, or Clutch, and go back and listen to classic bands like Sabbath and Queen, there's a lot of info between 300 and 600hz that can make guitar tracks pop out and leave room for you Bass to be the real bottom end.

Again,
These are only my opinions and things I find work well for me.

Cheers
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Halifaxsoundguy
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Jan 18, 2007
Posts: 327
Location: Halifax, NS Canada


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:01 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

What about loudness? When my amps master is on 1 or 2 it sound ok, but when its on 3-5 it sounds thick and Monstrous. How would you mic the amp for capturing the later sound?

Its weird how the same settings sound so different at different volumes.

Also I have been listening to a metal band called soilwork lately. They have that monstrous metal sound figured out. When you examine it, you'll find its like 70% Bass and drums and 30% guitar. I find that the bass guitar sound it what makes or break this type of guitar sound.

_________________
MBOX 2 PRO FACTORY, PRO-TOOLS LE 7.3
Apple MacBook (Tiger), 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4MB shared L2 cache, 2 GB MEMORY, 120GB HD
Western Digital 250 GB EXT. HD.

KRK Rokit 8's & Reason 4.



View user's profileSend private message
Moxioron
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 14


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:49 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Thanks for the responses. I must admit when I read things about lower frequencies I am a little puzzled.

Should I EQ the guitar and bass tracks and 1.) tweak the higher frequencies up a bit. 2.) make sure that the frequencies for each parameter are below 300?

Sorry for my noobness, I have never really messed with that before.

I just want a thick, rich sound from the bass and heavy guitar without the mud.

Thanks again for your help.
View user's profileSend private message
Moxioron
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 14


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:52 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Thanks for the responses. I must admit when I read things about lower frequencies I am a little puzzled.

Should I EQ the guitar and bass tracks and 1.) tweak the higher frequencies up a bit. 2.) make sure that the frequencies for each parameter are below 300?

Sorry for my noobness, I have never really messed with that before.

I just want a thick, rich sound from the bass and heavy guitar without the mud.

Thanks again for your help.
View user's profileSend private message
Crankitup
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 141
Location: Oakland, California


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:56 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

i think the other posters covered it quite well

1) you can cut some low frequencies from the guitars using either the eq on your amp or a hi pass filter

2) put a little overdrive / limiter on the bass to give it more presence in the mix

_________________
http://www.myspace.com/droidsyourelookingfor
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
mobilelab
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Posts: 44


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:10 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

this is unrelated but... I checked your myspace Crankitup. I loved the tunes. If you recorded it yourselves you've done a great job.
View user's profileSend private message
UncleBob58
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Apr 9, 2003
Posts: 650
Location: Fairfield County, CT


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:27 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Here's some disjoined comments that will hopefully confuse you all the more.

Michealangelo is quoted as saying the sculptures were already in the marble, all he did was take away the unneeded bits. As already explained the way to get rid of the "mud" is to remove frequencies common to the guitars and bass, a case of "less is more".

If you listen to the infamous Phil Spector "Wall of Sound" recordings each instrument and vocal part occupied its own part of the stereo and frequency spectrum.

My personal mix method is to get the groove (drums and bass) happening. I then get the vocal(s) and leads sounding great. The rest of the parts are "supporting cast" and mixed in around the groove, vox and leads. During the entire process I bounce between two sets of monitors and between mono and stereo.

Every talented engineer has his/her own way of working, and none of them are wrong as long as the final product is right. The key is finding the one that works for you, which can be a combination of other engineers methods or coming up with something uniquely yours.

_________________
Peace to all,

Uncle Bob
alcoveaudio.com


A craftsman knows how to avoid mistakes,
An artist knows how to use them. - Randy Thom
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
Crankitup
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 141
Location: Oakland, California


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:57 am Reply with quoteBack to top

hey thanks mobile. i did them all myself. i'm only a senior in highschool but music production is all i want to do

_________________
http://www.myspace.com/droidsyourelookingfor
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
BluesDimeBag
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group


Joined: Jan 05, 2008
Posts: 5


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:48 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

UncleBob58 wrote:
Here's some disjoined comments that will hopefully confuse you all the more.

Michealangelo is quoted as saying the sculptures were already in the marble, all he did was take away the unneeded bits. As already explained the way to get rid of the "mud" is to remove frequencies common to the guitars and bass, a case of "less is more".

If you listen to the infamous Phil Spector "Wall of Sound" recordings each instrument and vocal part occupied its own part of the stereo and frequency spectrum.

My personal mix method is to get the groove (drums and bass) happening. I then get the vocal(s) and leads sounding great. The rest of the parts are "supporting cast" and mixed in around the groove, vox and leads. During the entire process I bounce between two sets of monitors and between mono and stereo.

Every talented engineer has his/her own way of working, and none of them are wrong as long as the final product is right. The key is finding the one that works for you, which can be a combination of other engineers methods or coming up with something uniquely yours.

The bass guitar and the bass drum have to play off of each other.
Listen to Eminem, he is a great producer of bass...maybe the best when it comes to piecing it together. You may have to get a midi controller and get a subwoofer type of midi sound to layer under the guitar bass. You want to retain the string sound and the punch.
In hip hop or reggae the front of the bass sound, the attack, is taken out. All you hear is the fading, or the tail. It is classic and makes it sound as if the bass comes in at the middle of a note, the mystery lies in what is not there.
Miles Davis' My Funny Valentine is an example of just what is needed, no more.
Take out all you can and make use of when the bass does not sound.
View user's profileSend private message
THeBLueROom
Recording Org
Pro Audio Group



Joined: Jan 15, 2005
Posts: 148


------------

Books To Read
Your Forum Posts

gimmie gear

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:39 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

sometimes a lot of the mud can be in the 150-400 hz range. try dipping that out ...sometimes drastically... in that realm. Make sure you don't cut it ALL though and use a mild Q when you do cut. If you recorded in a small and less than ideal environment ...this can certainly be the case. If you want that thick Soilwork tone ...don't cut everything off at 300hz, that could kill a lot of the meat of the guitar. I'd say start by cutting in the above range on the guitar and/or bass and try bus compressing the guitar and bass together... just kissing the comp tho. I'd had this work very well with some metal bands I've produced. This may not work though if the bass is doing something totally different than the guitarist though.

_________________
ææææææææææææ
Happy Mixing!
E.
˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚
Supersonic Samples - Premium Drum Replacement Library DOWNLOAD NOW
ææææææææææææ
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic



This topic sponsored by:

  Sound Performance Lab
(Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)

  
  
  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group

PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner [Total Redesign By: Lorkan Themes] & 2004 www.toms-home.com
Pro Shop Cart
Your cart is empty.

[ Browse ]
Business Section
(News, Articles
Classifieds etc.)
· VocalBooth.com™ Gears Up for NAMM after a Year of Tremendous Growth
· New Rain LiveBook Audio Laptop With Up To 8GB RAM, Intel Montevina
· Artist Management Seminar - Washington DC
· Prime Loops Release Dirty Electro Synth Loops
· Free upgrade to Pro Tools 8 with any Digidesign LE product featuring 7.4.2
· Music Resources
· Eiosis releases AirEQ 5.1 Native and reduces the AirEQ's price
· Audio Impressions' announces Version 2.0 of DVZ Strings

[ More in News Section ]
Current Topics!
Last 10 Forum Messages

why is impedance so important?
Last post by primomusic in Recording Forum on Dec 01, 2008 at 23:21:31

output from UA 2192??
Last post by primomusic in Recording Forum on Dec 01, 2008 at 23:19:24

Great River impedance??
Last post by primomusic in Pro Audio Gear on Dec 01, 2008 at 23:17:59

Universal Audio 2192
Last post by primomusic in Pro Audio Gear on Dec 01, 2008 at 23:12:52

Tracking with or without EQ
Last post by Davedog in Recording Forum on Dec 01, 2008 at 23:05:43

Between Sonar or Cubase what would you choose and why?
Last post by hueseph in Digital Audio Forum on Dec 01, 2008 at 22:39:45

Studio layout-RED Flags???
Last post by avare in Studio Construction Forum on Dec 01, 2008 at 22:34:49

Neumann TLM103 or Rode K2?
Last post by jammster in Pro Audio Gear on Dec 01, 2008 at 22:19:00

Feedback, Sick of it
Last post by Codemonkey in Mixing Live Sound on Dec 01, 2008 at 22:13:04

Feedback on TV Intro
Last post by Greener in Song & Mix Critique on Dec 01, 2008 at 22:08:13


[ RECORDING ]
BookMark

 _MAKEBOOKMARK

New Topics!

why is impedance so important?
output from UA 2192??
Great River impedance??
Universal Audio 2192
recording electric guitar by Direct Input
I am so confused about recording vocals
Help with my setup??
Recorder under twelve hundred dollars
Feedback on TV Intro
Logic Pro 8: Error Code 28773
multiple hard disk configuration
Rut
A-designs p-1 and AT4050
FS: Soundcraft Venue Mixing Console 40 x 8 x 2
First time tracking a band Tips
Surround Sound Panning
Frecuency space in the mix
Firestudio compatability
Cuebase LE input question
monitoring audio from Acid Pro 6

RECORDING Forums

Recording Org RSS Feeds Community News. or Pro Audio Forums

Read this if you are a new poster Rules, who needs em?

For more information on advertising, investing , merging or any other ideas you may have for this community" Feedback

Pro Audio forums, audio reviews and all the moderating here is volunteer. Please remember no-one is being paid to be here or deliver hot coffee. Play Fair, be polite, patient and considerate to others. Title your topics properly and do not slander anyone, ever online. Also, if you love Recording Org and would like to make any donation in support of this site, please contact the Feedback link on the side bar. RO admin would be more than happy to add any contribution gift to the RO kitty. Give by becoming an RO Club Member and get a little better RO options.
Read this before your post here: Recording Org Disclaimer


This site can be translated into 13 languages. 錄音工作室幫助下,新聞和信息,數位專業音頻論壇, Opname studio helpen, nieuws en informatie, digitale pro audio forums, Studio d'enregistrement à l'aide de nouvelles et d'information, forums de l'audio numérique pro, Tonstudio helfen, Nachrichten und Informationen, digitale Pro-Audio-Foren, Estudio de grabación ayuda, información y noticias, foros de audio digital profesional. help, pro tools, cubase, nuendo, DAW, Music Education, Arranging, Composing,collaboration des musiciens, professionelle Musiker und Ingenieure, colaboración de músicos profesionales y los ingenieros lo que pensamos acerca de una banda
PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.35 Seconds

.: fiSubBrown Shadow phpbb2 style by Lorkan Themes :.
.: Original Theme (FiSubSilver Shadow) by: Daz 2004 :.