| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Recording.org PRO SHOP Categories |
| |
|
|
|
| Pro Shop Random Audio Product |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 79775625 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
Moxioron
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 14
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:40 pm |
  |
Hi all.
I am working on some songs that have a lot of high gain guitar tracks and I also want to bring out the bass. However, I am having some trouble getting around the muddy sound.
Any ideas or techniques that bring out the bass guitar and high gain guitar with out them sounding to 'muddy' post recording?
Thanks for your input. |
Last edited by Moxioron on Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
  |
 |
Link555
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Mar 31, 2007
Posts: 863
Location: North Vancouver
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:56 pm |
  |
roll of the lower frequiences on the guitars (everything below say 300hz ) but maybe post a clip. |
_________________ www.steller-studios.com |
|
   |
 |
RemyRAD
Moderator

Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Posts: 3609
Location: Washington DC Virginia suburbs
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:25 pm |
  |
To get more bass, you need less bass and some limiting. I generally don't add bass to bass guitars unless it's a crappy sounding bass. Of course if your chainsaw electric guitars are rich, too rich in bass, it's fighting the electric bass. So either choose one from column A or one from column B. I have a motorcycle, a van & a big truck. I can only drive one at a time. Although I can put the motorcycle in the big truck. I can't put the van in the big truck nor can I put the motorcycle in the van. Catch 22? Welcome to life and recordings.
One of the things that does work to make the bass more obvious is to add second harmonic distortion to it. Don't have any second harmonic distortion handy? OK, try some third harmonic distortion. How? A little overload on an amplifier can go a long way. Not to the point where it sounds crunchy but just till it sounds a little more dense. Which is only a couple of percent of distortion not 90% distortion. But this might not be an option for you? In that respect, a little limiting and equalization might be the limit?
One track mind.
Ms. Remy Ann David |
|
|
    |
 |
drstudio
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 52
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:45 pm |
  |
I totally agree Remy,
I recently sold a late 60's Ampeg SVT with the 8x10 Cab. It was the bomb for tracking, or re micing the recorded direct signal. Depending on the amount of distortion I wanted to add, I would hot patch input 1 to input 2 and drive it a bit harder. Using a 421 or even a 57... and sometimes a large diaphram condenser ie; 87, 193, 414 etc.
distortion is your friend when used the right way.
Another note on your High Gain guitar tracks. Sometimes less is more with the amount of gain you use on your amp, try backing it off a bit. It can sometimes help increase the size of the guitar sound and it can sound a little less mucky.
As for EQ, I find a lot of younger "engineers" boost to much in around 200hz, then again around 2 or 3k. If listen to bands like Queens of the Stone Age, or Clutch, and go back and listen to classic bands like Sabbath and Queen, there's a lot of info between 300 and 600hz that can make guitar tracks pop out and leave room for you Bass to be the real bottom end.
Again,
These are only my opinions and things I find work well for me.
Cheers |
|
|
   |
 |
Halifaxsoundguy
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 18, 2007
Posts: 327
Location: Halifax, NS Canada
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:01 pm |
  |
What about loudness? When my amps master is on 1 or 2 it sound ok, but when its on 3-5 it sounds thick and Monstrous. How would you mic the amp for capturing the later sound?
Its weird how the same settings sound so different at different volumes.
Also I have been listening to a metal band called soilwork lately. They have that monstrous metal sound figured out. When you examine it, you'll find its like 70% Bass and drums and 30% guitar. I find that the bass guitar sound it what makes or break this type of guitar sound. |
_________________ MBOX 2 PRO FACTORY, PRO-TOOLS LE 7.3
Apple MacBook (Tiger), 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4MB shared L2 cache, 2 GB MEMORY, 120GB HD
Western Digital 250 GB EXT. HD.
KRK Rokit 8's & Reason 4.
|
|
  |
 |
Moxioron
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 14
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:49 pm |
  |
Thanks for the responses. I must admit when I read things about lower frequencies I am a little puzzled.
Should I EQ the guitar and bass tracks and 1.) tweak the higher frequencies up a bit. 2.) make sure that the frequencies for each parameter are below 300?
Sorry for my noobness, I have never really messed with that before.
I just want a thick, rich sound from the bass and heavy guitar without the mud.
Thanks again for your help. |
|
|
  |
 |
Moxioron
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 14
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:52 pm |
  |
Thanks for the responses. I must admit when I read things about lower frequencies I am a little puzzled.
Should I EQ the guitar and bass tracks and 1.) tweak the higher frequencies up a bit. 2.) make sure that the frequencies for each parameter are below 300?
Sorry for my noobness, I have never really messed with that before.
I just want a thick, rich sound from the bass and heavy guitar without the mud.
Thanks again for your help. |
|
|
  |
 |
Crankitup
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 141
Location: Oakland, California
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:56 pm |
  |
i think the other posters covered it quite well
1) you can cut some low frequencies from the guitars using either the eq on your amp or a hi pass filter
2) put a little overdrive / limiter on the bass to give it more presence in the mix |
_________________ http://www.myspace.com/droidsyourelookingfor |
|
   |
 |
mobilelab
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Posts: 44
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:10 pm |
  |
this is unrelated but... I checked your myspace Crankitup. I loved the tunes. If you recorded it yourselves you've done a great job. |
|
|
  |
 |
UncleBob58
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 9, 2003
Posts: 650
Location: Fairfield County, CT
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:27 pm |
  |
Here's some disjoined comments that will hopefully confuse you all the more.
Michealangelo is quoted as saying the sculptures were already in the marble, all he did was take away the unneeded bits. As already explained the way to get rid of the "mud" is to remove frequencies common to the guitars and bass, a case of "less is more".
If you listen to the infamous Phil Spector "Wall of Sound" recordings each instrument and vocal part occupied its own part of the stereo and frequency spectrum.
My personal mix method is to get the groove (drums and bass) happening. I then get the vocal(s) and leads sounding great. The rest of the parts are "supporting cast" and mixed in around the groove, vox and leads. During the entire process I bounce between two sets of monitors and between mono and stereo.
Every talented engineer has his/her own way of working, and none of them are wrong as long as the final product is right. The key is finding the one that works for you, which can be a combination of other engineers methods or coming up with something uniquely yours. |
_________________ Peace to all,
Uncle Bob
alcoveaudio.com
A craftsman knows how to avoid mistakes,
An artist knows how to use them. - Randy Thom |
|
    |
 |
Crankitup
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 141
Location: Oakland, California
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:57 am |
  |
|
   |
 |
BluesDimeBag
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 05, 2008
Posts: 5
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:48 pm |
  |
| UncleBob58 wrote: | Here's some disjoined comments that will hopefully confuse you all the more.
Michealangelo is quoted as saying the sculptures were already in the marble, all he did was take away the unneeded bits. As already explained the way to get rid of the "mud" is to remove frequencies common to the guitars and bass, a case of "less is more".
If you listen to the infamous Phil Spector "Wall of Sound" recordings each instrument and vocal part occupied its own part of the stereo and frequency spectrum.
My personal mix method is to get the groove (drums and bass) happening. I then get the vocal(s) and leads sounding great. The rest of the parts are "supporting cast" and mixed in around the groove, vox and leads. During the entire process I bounce between two sets of monitors and between mono and stereo.
Every talented engineer has his/her own way of working, and none of them are wrong as long as the final product is right. The key is finding the one that works for you, which can be a combination of other engineers methods or coming up with something uniquely yours. |
The bass guitar and the bass drum have to play off of each other.
Listen to Eminem, he is a great producer of bass...maybe the best when it comes to piecing it together. You may have to get a midi controller and get a subwoofer type of midi sound to layer under the guitar bass. You want to retain the string sound and the punch.
In hip hop or reggae the front of the bass sound, the attack, is taken out. All you hear is the fading, or the tail. It is classic and makes it sound as if the bass comes in at the middle of a note, the mystery lies in what is not there.
Miles Davis' My Funny Valentine is an example of just what is needed, no more.
Take out all you can and make use of when the bass does not sound. |
|
|
  |
 |
THeBLueROom
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 15, 2005
Posts: 148
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:39 pm |
  |
sometimes a lot of the mud can be in the 150-400 hz range. try dipping that out ...sometimes drastically... in that realm. Make sure you don't cut it ALL though and use a mild Q when you do cut. If you recorded in a small and less than ideal environment ...this can certainly be the case. If you want that thick Soilwork tone ...don't cut everything off at 300hz, that could kill a lot of the meat of the guitar. I'd say start by cutting in the above range on the guitar and/or bass and try bus compressing the guitar and bass together... just kissing the comp tho. I'd had this work very well with some metal bands I've produced. This may not work though if the bass is doing something totally different than the guitarist though. |
_________________ ææææææææææææ
Happy Mixing!
E.
˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚
Supersonic Samples - Premium Drum Replacement Library DOWNLOAD NOW
ææææææææææææ |
|
  |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|