| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Recording.org PRO SHOP Categories |
| |
|
|
|
| Pro Shop Random Audio Product |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 79884798 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
SASman
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 1
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:57 am |
  |
Hi all, I hear a lot of differing opinion about this microphone.
Some really like the mic and some don't. Some call it crystal clear and I have
heard some suggest that it is thin and harsh sounding.
I guess I need to hear one for myself but I would like some owners of this mic to let me know their opinions.
Thanks |
|
|
  |
 |
Gib
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 18, 2007
Posts: 34
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:38 pm |
  |
This mic is a good utility mic for its price imo. My favorite part is the S/N ratio and how quite it is. It is a very clear mic for what it is, but can be harsh on some things. I wish it had a pad, but thats my only criticism.
Ive recorded many diff sources with it, and the only one I really hated using it on so far was Marimbas and Xylophones.
I think you cant go wrong with it for what its capable of and what it costs. There are better and worse mics out there obviously.
Id buy it again if I didnt already own one. I actually wish I had two.
Hope this helps |
|
|
  |
 |
BrianaW
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Posts: 144
Location: New York
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:16 pm |
  |
I own one as well, and my opinion is "Eh". I have had it since 2000 maybe? It sounds decent up to about 2k, then there seems to be a drop and then an extremely sharp incline around 6k and up. This leads to a bit of a muffled sound with a lot of harsh sibilance when used to record vocals. I have used it in conjunction with other mics to balance things out though and it works great. A 57 or an i5 compliments it nicely. The low end on the NT1 sounds pretty good though... tight and close. The NT1 + 57 combo works nicely for tracking acoustic as well. For the price, it's definitely a decent mic, but if I were you I'd really save up a couple of hundred more and get something a little nicer. The Blue Baby Bottle maybe? |
|
|
  |
 |
bigdaddybluesman
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Aug 24, 2007
Posts: 191
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:07 pm |
  |
It is not a good vocal mic in my opinion, it's too harsh.
It's clean though and can be used for other purposes. I was very disappointed with the sound and am waiting for a Mojave Ma 200 I ordered. |
|
|
    |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|