| Our Sponsors Pro Audio Products |
| |
|
|
| | Recording.org PRO SHOP Categories |
| |
|
|
|
| Pro Shop Random Audio Product |
| |
|
|
|
| | You are not subscriber of RECORDING. You can subscribe from here now! |
|
|
|
|
| We received 79775982 page views since March 15, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
| Recording Org Navigation Map |
|
| |
| |
Home |
| |
| |
Discussions |
| |
| |
Business Section |
| |
| |
Content |
| |
| |
Info |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your url ad could be here!
| Author |
Message |
AlexKavli
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Feb 15, 2008
Posts: 2
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:50 pm |
  |
|
  |
 |
mobilelab
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Posts: 44
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:03 pm |
  |
Hello, AK! Overall, the song is great and so is the mix. I don't think there is too much going on, and it seems as though you found balance in the mix. The only thing i wasn't stoked about was the sound of the toms. The thundering kick was cool, but maybe a little loud. The vocals on the chorus were a little quiet, maybe due to the drum mixing. All in all, a very solid mix. |
|
|
  |
 |
the_scort
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 28
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:10 pm |
  |
Just quickly:
I think overall it is a good mix. Indeed there are a lot of sounds, especially BGs, but you did a good job of panning the BGs to leave a hole in the middle for the lead vox. The EQ on the vox seems to give them a pretty strong resonance at a particular frequency (most noticeable at the beginning) in the midrange (possibly 700-900hz???) which seems to occupy alot of space at times and seems a little intrusive. Perhaps at times a little too sibilant as well, although as the song progresses it seems to work. Perhaps if you bring the level of the drums down just a touch it could give the overall mix a little more room? I think in lieu of the fact that the artist does not wish you to omit any parts, you have done much of what you can do to accommodate that request.
In any case, the tune sounds well done. |
|
|
  |
 |
RockmanXPR
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Posts: 43
Location: Northern California, Bay area
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 05, 2008 12:54 am |
  |
The only one thing I would bring up in the mix would be the lead vocals just a bit, i can hear it but barely as to what's being said, other than than rest of the mix is subjective due to differend tastes, I like what I'm hearing though. |
|
|
   |
 |
tobacco_slammers
Recording Org Pro Audio Group

Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 141
Location: Bo'ness, Scotland
------------
Books To Read
Your Forum Posts
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:04 pm |
  |
I quite like the song itself and I don't think there is too much going on.
Things that stick out to me:
I would say that the vocals need a bit of EQ tweeking, possibly a little less reverb. Also on the vocals when the artist begins to sing "Always" I can hear a sort of croaking noise from his voice. The level of the vocals seem fine to me.
The drums sound a bit muffled, especially the toms.
Other than that it's quite catchy. Originally I thought it was going to sound depressing from the intro but it wasn't.
Nice work, hope this helps;) |
|
|
  |
 |
|
|
This topic sponsored by: Sound Performance Lab (Tube, Mastering, Analog Gear)
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| | | | | | | Business Section (News, Articles Classifieds etc.) |
| |
|
|
|
|