ADGIL, Multimax or anything else

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2002 11:30 am

I need some opinions on surround sound monitor systems. I am more interested in soundualitythan a million features built in a box.

Has anybpdy listened to any of the various boxes side by side? I have heard that, allthough the multimax has a ton of features, it's not the best sounding unit out there.

Mark

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2002 2:17 pm

Well, I did my own test between the Adgil and the Multimax, and must say I'm extremely glad I decided on the Adgil.

The Multimax definitely does something to the sound. And it's not a good thing. The depth and definition of the sound is changed.

An article I read hit the nail on the head. When listening to the Adgil, it sounds like a blanket has been removed from the speakers.

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2002 11:22 am

Pardon my ignorance, but what the hell is a multimax? and an adgil?
-dim

->Post production is about fixing the fu@!!ps the rest of the production crew has unleashed upon us with a smile in our faces.<-

Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 6:16 am

Quote:

Originally posted by Henchman:
The Multimax definitely does something to the sound. And it's not a good thing. The depth and definition of the sound is changed.

We are working on Multimax and are very happy with it.
I must say, we only use them for monitoring purposes.
All final signal routings are digital.

AS for sound quality, I can not judge since our 5.1 room is so different in monitoring compared to the other studio's.
(LSR 32's in the 5.1 and HD1's in the other rooms)

Personaly I like the functionality of the Multimax.

Fredo

Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 6:53 am

Quote:

Originally posted by _dimlight_:
Pardon my ignorance, but what the hell is a multimax? and an adgil?

http://www.martinsound.com

This topic sponsored by: