Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Do you look at the woofer movement while mixing?

  1. #11
    Kev
    Kev is offline
    Golden Member Kev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, Aust
    Posts
    4,786
    Liked
    0 times

    Default

    fun yes
    but I disagree

    some clients are now asking for genre specific stuff

    pipe organ may have a strong bottom end BUT some dance is way hot
    Jazz singers may want accuracy so how does that fit with a squashed Green Day or Offspring vocal sound.
    Then there is the music being written for specific mediums
    NON CD audio mediums.
    ... net streaming , games and oh help us ... ring tones !!

    one size does not fit all

    I was asked to make sound sound scape stuff that did not sit on my acurate monitors at all well.
    Ended up final mixing on the theatre system for that specific show.
    SO much stuff below 40 hz my system just couldn't. I had to hire in low end gear and omit my normal low end. that's my PA system I'm talking about ... not my control room.
    This was back in the days of tape where I had a little more low end that on Pro Tools.
    The very lowest stuff was live out of signal generators and an analog synth.

    Just thinking about that show sends me back into shivers ... :shock:


    YES I am having some fun but there is a serious undertone here.

    The ghetto blaster was used to final check some 80's mixes.
    Unfortunately if the client asks for it ... they get it.
    Kev
    DIY Factory

  2. #12
    Golden Member Cucco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    4,663
    Liked
    8 times

    Default

    Kev and Joe -

    I think you guys are approaching the same subject from different directions.

    Kev - what you're referring to in your most recent post is the sound that they're after during the recording process

    Joe - what you're talking about is how it sounds coming out of the speakers.

    In this case, I would kind of agree with both of you. Jazzers, Classical-ites, Rockers and all others (if they're serious about music) all want good/accurate loudspeakers. They may not understand what this truly means, but they still want it. This is why Bose is still in business - people *think* they're accurate.

    Of course, Kev, you're absolutely right - certain genres prefer to have their sounds recorded differently - more compression, less compression, more bass, linear bass and so on.

    Now, back to the monitors -

    Rasputin -

    Sorry to tell you - The Dynaudios still don't have enough bass energy to accurately monitor the lowest octave. I use the BM15s now quite religiously and for anything uber-critical (particularly classical stuff) I switch in my REL subwoofer to give me the tones between 5Hz and 35 Hz. This also frees up some of the wasted energy from the Dyns and the Hafler amp. (When I cross over the Dyns, I use a 12 dB/octave low cut starting at 50 Hz. These speakers sound amazing in that range and do just fine below it, but the REL is designed for these frequencies).

    And I do agree with Joe - fix the mix as much as possible before going to the ME. It's not the ME's job to remove plosives or footfall - it's the RE's job.

    Now, back on subject again -

    Remember one fundamental rule of physics -

    Sound, by definition, is air molecules moving in a specific manner to produce pitch, timbre, and amplitude.

    Hence, if a cone during play has an excursion of roughly 2 inches in and out (or 4 inches of total travel) than a crap load of air is being moved. The bigger the woofer in this case, the lower the frequency possible. (of course, only if excursion distance and cone linearity or rigidity is a constant).

    When you don't hear anything but you magically see your cone pop out and back then you have a fast transient acting in the lower frequency and the likely scenario is that the sound was a brief impulse at best and since the wave is too long to actually strike your ear directly (though you will obviously have air molecules in motion and thus *some* sound at the ear), it would rely on "filling up the room" or using the box that is your room to assist in reigning in that particular frequency so that the energy does not dissipate too quickly or even worse, resonate at prime or sympathetic frequencies.

    If the woofer, however, is providing even front to rear excursion continually, it is in fact producing a tone. If it is a continuous excursion but you can't hear it, this doesn't mean it's infrasonic - it just simply means that the energy is minimal - so much so that it dissipates before it reaches you at a detectable level. (Remember, energy cannot be created nor destroyed - the dissipation is often in the form of heat - not enough to change room temperature, but it's there. B/C remember from physics - kinetic energy of air, or for that matter any molecules, most often transforms into heat energy. Example - try bending a paper clip over and over at the same point very quickly. Then touch the clip to the top of your lip, just below the nose (a very temperature sensitive area). You'll notice the heat generated by molecules in motion.)

    If your room is technically accurate (i.e., no excessive modes or nulls) and you're speakers have the physical properties necessary to create lower frequencies, any *regular and even* cone movement will be quite audible.

    As Kev states - no, speakers do not generally go all the way down as most people think. Think of the way a speaker works (slightly simplified)-

    You have a magnet structure and a voice coil - a charge is passed to the voice coil which is suspended in the center of a hole in the magnet. As such, the voice coil - attached to the cone uses the principal of "opposites attract and likes repel" So, by passing a charge identical to that of the magnet, the voice coil is forced out of the magnetic field. Once it is cleared of the magnetic field, it begins it's return trip back to its resting place. (B/C again, remember rules of physics here - all actions have an equal and opposite reaction - hence, if there is a 2 inch excursion, there will be 2 inches of rearward travel beyond the cone's natural resting point - which consequently helps to make a nicely formated wave. Of course, usually another charge is passed to the voice coil interrupting its return voyage - and since energy can't be destroyed, the return trip (a physical requirement) heat is generated. The faster this happens (IOW, the higher the frequency) the greater the cooling requirement on the driver because more energy is converted more quickly.


    So, in other words - once the cone has reached the point where the voice coil has cleared the magnet, it has reached it's greatest excursion point (under natural conditions - there is the possibility of excessive momentum from an incredibly loud impulse) and therefore, the cone will only vibrate/move so much air. So, these are the natural limitations of a driver's low frequency.

    Now, let's imagine you have a 4" voice coil on a 5" woofer. The potential for a total of 8 inches of travel on a woofer without that much surface area would be disastrous. The cone could not remain rigid (or if it were made of a material capable of remaining rigid under this circumstance, you would find out very quickly that you have yourself a little "Voice Coil Missile") and thus the pure sound that has been passed to it is now broken up (distorted). This will destroy a speaker.

    So - long story (err, very long story) short - if you're watching your woofers and seeing a lot of activity - it's not infrasonic and it ain't something you "can't hear." It is in fact sound and it is in fact in the audible register. (Unless you have a pair of monitors with 15" or 18" monitors and they're flopping around like mad.) The difference is, your monitors may not be able to produce the air movement energy necessary to make the sound "loud" OR your room is zapping the sound altogether. (Usually a pretty good combination of both.)

    The simple solution is to mix with a true full range system comprised of components that are designed to reproduce their respective frequencies. Mini-monitors are perfect for stuff above say 50 to 80 Hz b/c their woofers/midranges/tweeters are designed for that (as are their cabinets - you don't want to imagine 8 inches of 12" cone travel in a 2.5 cubic foot box -- That's the definition of a ***BOOM*** box.) Subwoofers do bass and that's it. Good ones (and well-calibrated ones) do it well, others just plain suck. Be careful in your sub selection.

    So, when in doubt, use a sub. If you can't - trust what you hear, not what you see. Oh, and BTW - a continuous 30 Hz tone will make your woofer move quicker than you think it will - think about it - 30 cycles per second. If you see your woofer slowly rocking in and out - you might wanna check your connections or your power line - you've got some serious issues and your speaker is potentially in danger.

    I hope this helps and doesn't confuse...

    J.

  3. #13
    Moderator JoeH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA/ Greenville, DE
    Posts
    1,991
    Liked
    4 times

    Default

    Well said, Jeremy!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Woofer
    By bigtree in forum Audio Terms
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-06-2010, 08:43 PM
  2. Mid-Woofer?
    By NickSoldier in forum Mastering Engineers Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-12-2009, 06:26 AM
  3. SUB WOOFER recomendations
    By praecox in forum Pro Audio Gear
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-28-2005, 04:09 AM
  4. Convert a woofer to microphone?
    By therecordingart in forum Pro Audio Gear
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-27-2004, 10:37 PM
  5. NS 10 woofer replacment?
    By Kurt Foster in forum Hybrid Recording Forums
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-02-2003, 11:27 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •