Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: And I thought Dynamics were a good thing...

  1. #11
    Pro Audio Community DavidSpearritt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    761
    Liked
    1 times

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Stafford
    Don't these people attend concerts?
    Bullseye! My guess is, they don't. Common problem all over the music industry, live music is the reference.

    We always use a modicum of compression of schools choirs, nothing more than 1.6:1 with a threshold of about 20deebs. But we tend to not use it at all with chamber music.

    As Ben says, we also find its use dependent on the type of music as well.

  2. #12
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Silver City, NM
    Posts
    87
    Liked
    0 times

    Default

    Can you get them in the room with you and let them hear different amounts of compression in realtime?

  3. #13
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    834
    Liked
    2 times

    Default

    Well, I've remastered it... We'll see how they like it this time.

    I basically upped the levels of compression (mostly in the parallel compression area, but also some overall compression) and added some additional limiting. I'm not happy with the sound- I've never cut such a loud classical album.

    That being said, I'm sure they'll love it- and if I don't keep my customers happy I don't have a business.

    I've discussed at great length with them the issues of a loud album and they are quite insistant that they don't want to have to be "running for the volume knob." Since they are paying the bill, I do what they want... In the end, I can encourage the artistic integrity of the project, but it is their project and they are the ones paying the bill. If I always put the artistic purity of a project over the business, I'd be broke... (well, more broke than I currently am... :? :P )

    We'll see what they think about this master.

    --Ben
    Benjamin Maas
    _____________________________
    Fifth Circle Audio
    Los Angeles, CA
    www.fifthcircle.com

  4. #14
    Pro Audio Inspired Javier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Caracas, Venezuela
    Posts
    22
    Liked
    0 times

    Default

    Hello FifthCircle. IMO I would handle levels this way:
    I would manually move up the softest passages by phrases.
    IE: Lets say that you have a phrase that leads to a mf (say peaks at -10). I would raise the whole phrase by 6or 7 db so it will peak at -3 db. That would be mf. Forte at -2 and fortissimo AND fortississimo at -1(maybe with a little compression and manual removal of short transient peaks).Even in the case that you have a long phrase that continuosly grows in volume there are many inner portions that you can manipulate for reducing the dynamic range without affecting the harmonic content. Volume would mostly raise in small steps rather than continuosly. I think what they are listening for is the relative change of amplitude within the musical phrases. I donīt think (and i hope) they can be able to tell if the mf that happened 2 minutes ago was almost as loud as the forte they hearing (by 2 db). This method has worked for me. Best regards for you all fine engineers. Javier

  5. #15
    Golden Member Thomas W. Bethel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Oberlin, OH
    Posts
    2,376
    Liked
    19 times

    Default

    I am currently working on a project in "world music" The performer did all of his own recording. He did all the WRONG things during the recording phase but now wants me to pass the "magic wand" of mastering over the project and make everything ok. He is located in a far city and we are sending him refs at intervals. One of his biggest complaints is that "all the tunes should sound the same and be at the same level"

    This, as you might imagine, has not been an easy CD to master since I am dealing with all kinds of problems plus an artist that wants his stuff LOUD but with "lots of dynamic range" When he first recorded this stuff it was done in all kinds of different venues and he also wants it all to sound like it was recorded in one venue complete with the same reverb and the same ambience. We have been working on this project since July. One of the tunes has a berimbau (an instrument that looks like a gourd with a bow sticking out one side) he has drilled a hole in one side and places a microphone inside the gourd. He bangs the instrument on his lap as he is singing. Problem is that the microphone is loose inside the gourd and when he bangs it on his lap the microphone produces some really nasty square Waves which are distorted. I had to go though and manually fix each occurance of the problem which took hours to do.

    We are in the final stages of the mastering and he is determined that he wants all the songs at the same level and wants me to "compress them" so they will sound good to someone listening in their car and they will not have to adjust their volume control for the whole CD or if they are listening to his stuff on radio and he wants it to sound as loud as a rock tune that it played before his material. Some of the tunes are done on a solo thumb piano (mbira) and are very soft some are he and his partner singing Isreali folk songs and some are production numbers with lots of instruments and lots of level. One of his tunes starts out at about -22 dBFS and goes at the end to 0 dBFS. This is in the space of about 4 minutes of song. He wants the begining and ending to "sound the same"

    I have done work for this artist in the past but all of his work up until now has been done by a professional recording engineer and the tracks were great to work with from the start. These a proving to be almost undoable.

    This loudness race has to STOP and soon because it is ruining MUSIC.

    MTCW
    -TOM-
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Thomas W. Bethel
    Managing Director
    Acoustik Musik, Ltd.
    Room with a View Productions
    Oberlin, OH 44074

    Celebrating 18 years in the mastering business in 2013

    http://www.acoustikmusik.com


  6. #16
    Moderator JoeH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA/ Greenville, DE
    Posts
    1,991
    Liked
    4 times

    Default

    Javier, I've done a few tricks like that from time to time, to bring a level up here and there, it does work in a pinch, but I can't imagine being forced into doing that for an entire CD. Fairly time-consuming, isn't it?

    Tom, I certainly hope you're getting paid well for this madness. (I can only shake my head in agreement at reading some of these stories...been there, done that, don't wanna do it again if I can help it!)

    I'm currently dealing with a client that is "fixing" the audio bed of a multimedia soundtrack that will go onto a DVD. The music is from two performances of "classical" holiday (mostly Christmas) music, and it involves narrator, soloists, choir, harpsichord, piano, a glass 'armonica, and a partridge in a pear tree. (Well, almost....)

    There was video shot as well, but he's so bent on fixing little things, that any "sync" has long been destroyed (and we're not doing the video portion for them anyway...that's someone ELSE's problem now). Now that we've "Fixed" all the dialog and narration, we'll be tackling the music tomorrow. I know he'll want the quiet solo string passages UP as loud as can be, and he'll want to reduce the field drum and concert drum (which sound WONDERFUL left alone) to fit in the squashed dynamic range he's looking for.....sigh..... we weren't able to put a mic on the glass harmonica player (for visual/sightline reasons at the performance) so I can't WAIT untill we get to "Fixing" that part....

    I'm thinking maybe we need to revive the "Horror" stories thread and make it a sticky. There seems to be no end to the things we sometimes get forced into doing, eh?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Dynamics
    By bigtree in forum Audio Terms
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-06-2010, 01:29 PM
  2. Is a USB 1.0 midi thing good enough
    By LovesMeTrike in forum Hybrid Recording Forums
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-11-2009, 08:51 AM
  3. Is compression necessary with good dynamics?
    By MediaMurder in forum Recording Vocals
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-02-2008, 07:03 PM
  4. Can being two-faced ever be a good thing?
    By Oliver Sheen in forum Studio Construction & Acoustics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-01-2004, 10:20 AM
  5. How many 'overs' are a good thing?
    By Michael Kiaer in forum Mastering Engineers Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-03-2002, 01:46 AM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •