Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

  1. #1
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    8
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    I want to know what do you think about the Mackie and the hafler monitors, wich ones is better then the other

  2. #2
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    whocares
    Posts
    118
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    I have had both. You can't really compare them. The Mackies have the stupid rear firing passive radiator. Placement is always tough with a nearfield, but it is an even bigger issue with the Mackies. True you have the presets on the rear for acoustic space and roll-off, but you can not place them against the wall, or in a soffit, due to the passive radiator.

    The Mackies are louder, but less defined in the mid bass region. The haflers don't have the depth, frequency wise.
    When you die, you can't take it with you. So, can I have it?

  3. #3
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    8
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    A friend told me that he had some problems mixing with the Mackie's, he dont hear some things with the mackies, specially in the mid low range, is this true??

    About your commentary lowdbrent, I don't have space between the monitors and the wall, is this a point to consider in my special case to buy the Hafler's??

    Paco

  4. #4
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    whocares
    Posts
    118
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    In my opinion, I have had no luck with the Mackies. I gave myself 6 months to get used to them. To me they don't image well, and they are vague in the mid bass.

    any monitor is going to have an increase in bass when placed net to a boundary. I would guess that you would have less trouble with the haflers than the Mackies.

  5. #5
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    whocares
    Posts
    118
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    It is best to buy the monitors from a place that will let you demo them in your room, or let you exchange them should they not work out.

    Neither of these may be right for your room. I don't know. You may be able to get by with the Yorkville active monitors, which are extremely cheaper, or you could buy some nicer monitors used, like Meyer HD-1's, or Dynaudio's, Genelec's, etc.

    I like Genelec's to a point. They can make everything sound too good. They can fool you into thinking something is better than what it is. I still like Yamaha NS-10's with a good Class A amp, and Auratones. If I can get the mix right on those, they will work anywhere.

  6. #6
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    8
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    Thanks lowdbrent, I've tried in my studio the Mackie monitors and tomorrow I am going to test the haflers, but I think I'm going to choose the Haflers. I have Yamahas NS10M, and I like it a lot, but I always have problems with the low frequencies, I need a better refference in the mid low range. Here in Mexico, the difference in price between Yorkville and Hafler is not to much, so I prefer to spend a little more for better sound.

    Paco

  7. #7
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    8
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    By the way, Dynaudio and Genelec are inaffordable here in Mexico, they are too expensive.

    Thank you for your comments

    Paco

  8. #8
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    11
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    Hey Paco,

    I have been using a pair of Mackies HR 824 for around 2 years now. All I can say is that I have had no real problems with them. Yes it does depend on where you place them regarding the wall issue. I have brought them to several different rooms and have learned to accomadate for the different spaces etc. via the switches on the back panel. Being able to tailor a speaker for different areas has been a great plus.

    Regards,

    ( o}===;;;
    ( o}===;;;
    "Life is short."

  9. #9
    jg
    jg is offline
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Bay Area, Ca.
    Posts
    18
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    I have Mackie HR824's.

    I love 'EM.
    The bass pounds great for me, they are tight & I don't get much ear fatigue (at proper volume).
    I do alot of dance, Hip Hop, sample/loops, big bass type stuff & they seem to love it.

    Mine are actually positioned (at an angle) pretty damn close to a wall (wall's covered with sound/foam wedges) and they still seem to be ok for my use.

    I also use a cheapie pair of old Radio Shack bookshelf speakers for A/B'ing.

    In the past I have used the Alesis (crap), KRK & the NS10's.
    I'd still like to have a pair of NS10's (just to say I have them) but think I am doing just fine without for now.

    HR824 = :tu: by me!

  10. #10
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    35
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: Mackie vs Hafler monitors

    The Mackie HR824s are wonderful. They have very good separation and clarity, and really capitalize when it comes to well recorded cymbals. I'm not sure if that means much to anyone else, but put on Steely Dan's - Asia and compare it on HR824s to the yorkville YSM1-Ps, and you'll immediately see what I'm talking about.

    Oddly enough the HR624s don't seem to borrow anything from their bigger brother, and if they do I can't hear it. They sound very muddy and washed out to me.

    If you're thinking of mixing/mastering with these monitors, which I'm guessing you are, you don't want to get by with Yorkvilles. You may as well just drag your recording through a pool of mud, step on it, and set it on fire before even hitting play, because that's what it's going to sound like through those monitors anyway. Trust me, I know.

    As for Haflers, a customer of mine just picked up some TRM10s, and I'm waiting to hear his opinions on them. He had originally picked up KRK V8s, but he got two pairs of duds, and traded up to the Haflers.

    Anyway, IMHO the HR824s are wonderful monitors for their price, don't sell yourself short with Yorkvilles, check out the Haflers TRM10s, and most importantly A/B all of them side by side with a couple of CDs you know really well before you buy anything. Ultimately your ears should decide (that's EARS, not wallet, if you can help it =).
    Don't be afraid to fall.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Hafler studio monitors opinions
    By bigtree in forum Studio Monitors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-29-2010, 10:44 AM
  2. Hafler Monitors
    By jbeutt in forum Hybrid Recording Forums
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-09-2005, 08:11 AM
  3. Mackie monitors
    By lawtonmchiles@mac.com in forum Pro Audio Gear
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-07-2003, 02:25 PM
  4. Hafler TRM8 vs Mackie Hr824
    By netinsect in forum Hybrid Recording Forums
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-17-2003, 01:03 PM
  5. Mackie HR8-24 Monitors - What settings?
    By Mad John in forum Pro Audio Gear
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-01-2001, 10:11 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •