Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Computer system MUCH better than Multitrack Recorder??

  1. #1
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Right behind you!
    Posts
    56
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Computer system MUCH better than Multitrack Recorder??

    Howdy everyone,

    New to the forum but not recording. Unfortunately, I come from the pre-existing multitrack recording studios from wayyy back. Every recording device I have ever owned was a multitrack recorder from the cassette porta-04 studio to my current Roland digital 8-track.

    I see by the posts on this forum that virtually everyone has a PC or Mac based system. I am super-intimidated by all the gear that is required for a great Mac based recording studio to go in a smallish room in my house. I have Korg keyboards, drums, guitars and all that Jazz. The problem is I am so used to the very decent sound and simplicity of self-contained Multitrack recorders and was wondering if someone could tell me why everyone seems to be so much more for the computer based systems. Are they THAT much better in quality than the multitrack recording devices out now? Is it worth the headache of patchbays, mixers, drivers, soundcards, effects programs, sequencers, compressors, finding humming noises in your gear, polarity issues, software upgrades, system crashes and all that? Korg and Roland have some (IMO) very nice 24 and even 32 track recorders with 8 XLR inputs, optical ins and outs with all the effects and CD-burner right on board., plus it's very quiet for someone who cannot put his noisy gear in another room!

    Is this still a good way to go for my $3000, or can someone convince me to go the way of the computer? What are the disadvantages of the Multitrack with all of its simplicity? Why a computer based studio?

    Thanks very much for your time and responses,

    Razor

  2. #2
    Golden Member Cucco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    4,663
    Liked
    8 times

    Default

    Can you say "Can of Worms" ???

    You'll get a lot of replies on this one.

    Let's see - comparing a $3000 computer system with an "all-in-one." First let's talk about the negatives about both.
    Negatives to the All-in-one:
    1. Bad mic-pres
    2. Bad A/D converters
    3. Cheesy on-board effects processors
    4. Very limiting (though you can add outboard stuff to a lot of these boxes, there's typically no helping the sound of an all-in-one.)
    5. Upgrades VERY pricey - when this thing breaks/needs upgrading - you have to flush the old and drop another $3k for a new one.
    6. Lots more disadvantages, but I'll leave those to other 65 posts you'll get on this one.
    Negatives to the PC/Mac based:
    1. Initially kind of expensive. (However, for $3k, you can do just fine!)
    2. Portability can be a pain. (It's do-able, but less easy than the all-in-one)
    3. Not much else. (Or at least, in my biased opinion there's not.)

    Positives - All in one:
    1. It's all in one! Take it everywhere you go. Throw it in a laptop bag and record anywhere!
    2. GUI has a relatively small learning curve.

    Positives to PC:
    1. Outboard gear infinitely upgradeable.
    2. Built-in effects on Cubase/Cakewalk/Pro Tools are far better than those built into all-in-ones.
    3. If parts break or become outdated, replace a relatively inexpensive part, not the whole beast!
    4. Very easy GUI!
    5. Sound quality associated with better gear.

    I just built another rackmount pc for on-the-road recording consisting of an AMD 64, 3200 processor, ASUS Motherboard, Antec Rackmount case, Silverstone quiet power supply, Maxtor 40GB and 160GB hard drives, Windows XP, 1 Gig of Kingston RAM, Samsung LCD (15"), Gator Shock mount case, and Pelican flight case (to transport the lcd and mics) for $1621.87. Add Cubase SX to that, it brings you to $2200. Add the Aardvark Q10, you're now at $2900. You now have a bad-ass machine that is infinitely upgradeable with great converters, good pre's, mobile, quiet, and incredibly flexible. Did I mention, it sounds good!

    This, to me, sounds like a no brainer. If you e-mail me, I will gladly send you an excel spreadsheet with links to all of the parts that I used as well as prices (at least they were the prices a couple weeks ago - they've probably gone down now.)

    My e-mail address is: jeremy@sssweb.net

    My 2 pennies,

    J... :D

  3. #3
    Pro Audio Community Jon_The_Lefty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    62
    Liked
    0 times

    Default

    Hey Razor... I'm fairly new to recording but I can say this... I looked long and hard at the all-in-ones and then at the pc/mac based recording setups and from the economist view, the all-in-one sounded much better to me (this was before I looked at all of the possibilities in a pc/mac based setup...). It didn't take long once I started looking at pc/mac based to make up my mind that that is what would suit me the best. I am a student and very hard pressed for money so the considering that I had built a pc about a year ago that would do fine with the recording setup that I desired I didn't have to dish out the 800-1600 bucks for the pc... this set up also attracted me because I knew I could just keep adding to it and upgrading as a I needed and as my music grew!!! (irreplacable to a musician like me) so the pc/mac system is the route I went I have no regrets, although the all-in-one sound nice, they have serious upgrade issues if you ask me 8-) 8-)
    If shame had a face I think it would kinda look like mine... if fear had a home it would be my eyes...

  4. #4
    Pro Audio Community dabmeister music's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Temple Hills, MD.
    Posts
    497
    Liked
    0 times

    Default

    Thought I'd drop this in too. Computer based systems offer the user that..."do it yourself syndrome". You'll find yourself basically, not having to drag it to a repair center for servicing, and furthermore, you'll know it inside & out. I own an Adat XT20 and virtually don't use it at all other than doing a few transfers into the DAW system via digital I/O. And to add to it, you'll never have problems doing hardware upgrades. There's an abundance of support, especially for PC's. Just my .02 worth.
    "It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got that swing"
    www.soundclick.com/dbmusicalproductions
    www.myspace.com/dbmusicalproductions

  5. #5
    Pro Audio Community radioliver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    181
    Liked
    0 times

    Default

    Cucco explained this very well and I just want you to know that he's not the only one who thinks like that. You will only get replies telling you pc is the best way to go. His example is really good too. That would give you 8 mic preamps, 8 line outs, four inserts, midi input and output....everything you would get from your all in one and more. One thing I don't agree with is Cubase. If your really into midi, go with cubase but if you record mostly audio, i would suggest the new Sonar 4 from Cakewalk. That software kills any all in one in a flash!!

    Good luck finding what suits you!
    Olivier Masson
    http://caughtsleeping.cjb.net
    "Stay true to your friends, they're the ones who'll save you in the end" Sam Roberts

  6. #6
    Golden Member Cucco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    4,663
    Liked
    8 times

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by radioliver
    One thing I don't agree with is Cubase. If your really into midi, go with cubase but if you record mostly audio, i would suggest the new Sonar 4 from Cakewalk. That software kills any all in one in a flash!!

    Good luck finding what suits you!
    Very true! Cakewalk for Midi is tough to beat. The Cubase example is for me; that's what I use.

  7. #7
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Right behind you!
    Posts
    56
    Liked
    0 times

    Default

    Thanks for your input, people. Where on earth do I start?? Any good ideas? Really like the idea of a Mac based system, but have no idea how or where to get started and what the necessities are. Thanks a million and please forgive the newbie question. New to computer recording and Mac especially.

    thanks for the inputs.

    Razor

  8. #8
    Golden Member Cucco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    4,663
    Liked
    8 times

    Default

    I think you have already gotten a good start. The first thing to do is to ask questions and do some research. The question I have for you is, why specifically a Mac? If you are not familiar with Macs and moreso with PC, there is no reason not to use a PC. You'll find they are less expensive up front, just as stable (nowadays at least, running 2000 Pro or XP), and easier/more cost effective to upgrade. (Though Mac is closing the gap on this).

    Many good hardware devices exist for PC as do many great pieces of software.

    If you have your mind set on Mac, by all means, buy one. However, don't just do it because a couple die hard Mac fans tell you it's the only way to go.

    (P.s. I happen to love Macs, but that doesn't mean I think they are the best for all situations.)

    J...

  9. #9
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Right behind you!
    Posts
    56
    Liked
    0 times

    Default

    I was under the (mis)impression? that macs were better suited for this kind of work and were more stable OS-wise. If there is NO difference in reliability or sound quality, I am happy with a PC. I just don't want to get something that crashes, or get my PC with Win XP and find out that some new windows is on the horizon and that all my software will be obsolete in 2 years time. As I mentioned before, for someone used to an all-in-one, this multi-faceted PC method is very intimidating and I need all the user friendly means/methods at my disposal I can get.

    Razor

  10. #10
    Golden Member maintiger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Whittier, California, USA
    Posts
    1,642
    Liked
    0 times

    Default

    Macs are reliable out the door- pcs have to be made so. You can spend a lot of $$$ on a pc to optimize it for music while the mac is set to go from the getgo- If you want to get a pc though, make a post in the daw forum- someone will help you get it together there-

    If you are set on a mac I recommend at least a dual 867 (about $700-800 used)- any of the crops of new macs are fine if you want new. make sure you have at least 1 GB ram and get an extra drive for audio- all the power macs have room for at least another drive- not sure of the imacs or emacs- you might have to get an extra firewire drive-

    For programs is either Motu Digital Performer ($500), Logic express, (299) or logic pro ($1000) - there are others but these are the ones am familiar with and they rock!

    For interface I recommend the firewire 828 mkii from motu ($750)- and that's it, you are set to go!
    Xavier Calvera R.O. Vocal Booth Moderator
    www.lordtiger.com
    Check out what I am working on at http://www.myspace.com/elrodgeare

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Multitrack recorder/mixer help!!!
    By liveit777 in forum Hybrid Recording Forums
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-19-2011, 10:40 PM
  2. Multitrack Recorder advice
    By dbrook2010 in forum Home Recording Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-11-2010, 10:28 AM
  3. Buying and Using a Multitrack Recorder - And Hi :)
    By Amnesia180 in forum Home Recording Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-07-2008, 07:27 AM
  4. digital multitrack recorder for sale
    By Stackz42 in forum Budget Gear
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-11-2007, 11:04 AM
  5. Multitrack recorder/mixer for live use
    By TMTS in forum Budget Gear
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-19-2006, 11:58 AM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •