Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: dbx vs. ART

  1. #1
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14
    Liked
    0 times

    Default dbx vs. ART

    I need some advice So, I am in the market to buy a new mic preamp. I have around $500 to spend and I was looking at two:

    the dbx 376 - tube mic pre, compressor, eq & de-esser; digital outs

    ART Pro Channel - tube mic pre, tube compressor, tube eq.

    Heres the thing, I have experience with the dbx 386, which is the dual, just mic pre version of the 376. I love the 386. Nice piece for the collection.

    Now, there aren't many detail on the "tubeness" of the 376. I know the input and output stage are tube, but, I don't know about the compressor, eq and de-esser.
    The info I have read on the ART Pro Channel says that every stage except the compressor is tube and that the compressor is optical.

    I am liking the ART Pro Channel more and more, but, would love to hear feedback on both or either of these units. I want to hear from people who of USED these pieces. Please. Thanks!!!

    -Matt Feddermann
    Phase Media
    www.phasemedia.com
    "The things that come to those who, may be the things left over by those who got there first."

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Davedog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    4,777
    Liked
    95 times
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default Re: dbx vs. ART

    All tube circuits are different.Some are made to be overdriven as are some solidstate op-amp type circuits.Some are not.I have a class A tube power amp built by one of my partners.It doesnt distort(well it does but its not really measurable).....

    As for your question.The Art MPA,VLA,and the Pro Channel are all tube designs but are not intended to be the tube-essence type of cicuit.They are very clean and very usable despite what a lot of high-end gear snobs may tell you.Most have not used this gear out of fear of reprimand by their buddies.Their loss.I personally am not a fan of the 300 series of dbx though I do own a 900 rack full of compressors and eq's.I do own the ART gear and it sounds great.I happen to like the characteristics of opto comps.While the pre is not your Neve-in-yer-face kind of sound, it does its job and really lets the sound of the mic through.Multiple channels of usage does not tend to become cluttered or muddy, so using them on a lot of sources has not been a problem.There are some mods for all these units available online and from what I hear, turn these slightly vanilla yet very workable units into extreme high-end .Considering their low price and adding the price of these mods, you're still way below the cost of the higher end pieces and still have the performance.
    da moderAtor....proprietor of droolindoggrecords.com....everything in moderation including moderation...Pythagorean Number-Cult Acoustics Deriver #1158

  3. #3
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    (Orange County) Calif. USA
    Posts
    116
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: dbx vs. ART

    Matt,

    I have both an old ART pro MPA and a DBX 376 laying around that doesnt get used very much these days.. I will tell you the ART and the DBX tube pre section are very similar sounding (not much difference sonically) I do not like the 376 compressor at all due to its limited controls and its heavy/squashing nature. the digital conversion is nothing special (or any better than your basic digi 001)the EQ section is at best decent, never even used the de Esser. (the 376 sounded its worst to me on vocals) not bad on accoustic guitars.

    if I had to choose between the two (and I had too) I would definetly go with the ART Pro Channel as it actually has a very nice compression section (very versitle) and a very usable EQ. much warmer for vocals and many other applications. i upgraded the tubes in my ART and DBX and it did help..

    we did a little shootout with the Avalon 737, HHB Radius 40, the art pro channel, and the DBX 376...the art and hhb did surprisingly well up against the Avalon, the 376 was a toy!

    good luck

  4. #4
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: dbx vs. ART

    Thanks guys. Thats what I thought, based on the specs. I'm glad to hear my gut feeling was confirmed. This is the only place I can generally get honest, no snob answers. Thanks a bunch!


    -Matt

  5. #5
    Pro Audio Community
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    62
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: dbx vs. ART

    Is there a reason you're limiting yourself to these two options?

  6. #6
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: dbx vs. ART

    These two were the "best" mic pre, compressor, and eq in my price range. I mean, I'd love to have a Great River pre-amp going into an ELOP, but, I don't have an extra $5000 laying around! :> If there is another great sounding mic pre, compressor and eq, built in one, or there units that can be purchased for $500, please, let me know. I'd be very interested.

    Thanks everyone,

    Matt

  7. #7
    Respected Past Moderator AudioGaff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    2,464
    Liked
    1 times

    Default Re: dbx vs. ART

    If there is another great sounding mic pre, compressor and eq, built in one, or there units that can be purchased for $500,
    You should be able to get a Joemeek for $500. Look for a used VC1, VC1Q or VC1Qcs. I see them often in or below the $500 mark. Very good sound and great value. I own the VC1Qcs myself and find that I use it on many things. I think it is either the VC3 or VC6 which is the stripped down model but with the same mic pre, comp and eq for even less money.
    - AudioGaff -
    RO Pro Audio Moderator

  8. #8
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: dbx vs. ART

    I already own a VC1, mic pre, comp, eq/enhancer. I love it. I am looking for another product to add to the collection. Great unit! I love it! Thanks!

    -Matt

  9. #9
    Respected Past Moderator AudioGaff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    2,464
    Liked
    1 times

    Default Re: dbx vs. ART

    Having another VC1 or the updated VC1Q or VC1Qcs wouldn't be a bad thing? You might save up a bit more and check out the new Toft Audio stuff.

  10. #10
    Pro Audio Inspired
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    6
    Liked
    0 times

    Default Re: dbx vs. ART

    I own a Tube Channel and would recommend it. It's good, not great, but the comp and eq are decent, and you should have a couple of bones left over, judging from what you say your budget is......

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. DBX 160 vs DBX 161
    By allenbergendahl in forum DIY Pro Audio Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-29-2011, 01:28 AM
  2. DBX 160 vs. DBX 160x
    By adam79 in forum Pro Audio Gear
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-31-2009, 09:54 PM
  3. ART Pro VLA vs. ART TC3?
    By amg1 in forum Pro Audio Gear
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 07-10-2005, 01:43 PM
  4. dbx 117 / 119 decilinear vs. dbx 160VU
    By mig27 in forum Pro Audio Gear
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-08-2002, 04:08 AM
  5. DBX 586 vs. ART DPS DI/O
    By jeronimo in forum Home Recording Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-18-2002, 03:04 AM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •