Wow, how big of a diffuser are we talking about here?
BOw. HEre is a question I have,
How does one take into account a low-frequency diffusion system in reguards to the modal response of a room?
Say the deep bass diffusion is on the rear wall, do you avarage the distance btween the front wall and the various well depths? This new dimention would in turn affect the width and ceiling dimentions. Does a low frequency diffusor shift the focus away from a standard golden modal formula? Bow bow, happy tuesday everyone
J.
A.
M!
Wow, how big of a diffuser are we talking about here?
I was planning on about 5 feet deep, up to 23 feet wide.
BASIC calcs propose it would function down to 54 Hz??
I'm wonder what course should be taken to balance such
a beast inside the rest of the room. I may be try to
tame something WAY to big for myself too, but diffusion is so sensual spacially. J.A.M!
Pewep,
> How does one take into account a low-frequency diffusion system in reguards to the modal response of a room? <
I think you're looking at the wrong solution. Maybe you could build a diffusor that works down to very low frequencies, but what's the point? It seems to me that all rooms need absorption at low frequencies far more than they need diffusion.
What are you actually trying to accomplish?
--Ethan
Yeah, you're calculation of the low frequency limit seems accurate, but i'm with Ethan - this seems strange. I've never heard of any studio, auditorium or anything having diffusers of this size.
One investigation on LF diffusion was presented by James Angus at AES back in 1999. (There have been other studies.) Dr. Angus' paper: The Effect of Diffusers on Frequency Dependent Room Mode Decay (AES Preprint #5060) even had some scale models of LF diffusion and how well it worked (or didn't work - you decide! :D ).
As for Pewep's inquiry, no one's asked him how large the room is in which he'd like to build this uber-diffusor?
---lovecow---
"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you're going, because you might not get there." - Yogi Berra
Everest shows pictures of some studios in Europe with extraordinarily large and deep diffusors.
JAM, you raise a good valid question, and Jeff, ever on the ball, that study sounds very interesting. I haven't ante'd up the $10 to read it yet, but I'd love to know the results. One would think that a properly designed 5-foot deep diffusor could work wonders for smoothing out a room's modal response. In theory, the result of such an approach would be a much more lively room with so many more nulls and peaks that no null or peak would be dominant, and the entire response of the room would be more even. Then the room wouldn't require so much absorption.
Jeff, any more clues you can give about the conclusion of the paper?
JAM, please provide your proposed room dimensions. And exactly what kind of diffusor did you have in mind to build? How deep the wells, what pattern, how tall, how thick the dividers, what material?
Lee
Hey acoustics mods, this thread should really be renamed to something like 'bass diffusion' so people can search for it.
Jazz,
I think I can shed some light. The proposed technique is to vary room shape according to a diffusion sequence such that the number of modes is increased. In theory, this increase in modal density provides for a more diffuse low frequency sound field. (The "more nulls and peaks" thing you mentioned.)
To test the theory, Dr. Angus performed electromagnetic measurements in a room before and after certain shaped surfaces were added. (Very novel approach, I thought.) The conclusions Dr. Angus drew from his studies were as follows:
Originally Posted by Dr. James Angus, AES Preprint 5060, Section 7
Jeff, thanks.
Lee
Bookmarks