1. Register NOW and become part of this fantastic knowledge base forum! This message will go away once you have registered.

80hz roll off..beware or use it

Discussion in 'Recording' started by stickers, Mar 23, 2006.

  1. stickers

    stickers Active Member

    I was recording myself the otherday with my acoustic. 3 mics. XY stereo on guitar and vocal mic.

    I used 80hz roll off on all the trackand found that it really made things cleaner and clearer than with out it.

    Then out of curiousity, i recorded the same thing without the 80Hz and it seemed cloudy due to extra lows. So i used an eq plug in with 80Hz roll with the same amount of decrease in gain per octave and it just didnt seem to have the same clarity..weird.

    why?
     
  2. RemyRAD

    RemyRAD Well-Known Member

    Hey Sticky, I think you'll find that the 80 hertz filter on the microphone is at the capsule prior to the impedance converter/electronics? The impedance converter/electronics will not get ravaged by the low frequencies from the proximity effect.

    Doing it in the software meant that the microphone had to contend with those extended low frequencies in its electronics prior to the microphone preamplifier.

    One of the same reasons why I like to use compression/limiting while I am tracking as opposed to after. People are so afraid of doing something that cannot be undone which only comes from inexperience. One must take risks in order to grow. If people are worried about being safe call the time while recording, why do people drive cars? They're so dangerous and you cannot undo death. Best not to drive anywhere. NOT!

    Still alive after all these years
    Ms. Remy Ann David
     
    audiokid likes this.
  3. stickers

    stickers Active Member

    the roll off is on the mic pre
     
  4. stickers

    stickers Active Member

    Remy got on AIM!
     
  5. jwnc

    jwnc Active Member

    I usually roll off 80 on the recording also, I usually end up taking off up to 125 hz on the acoustic. Then once you do that the acoustic usualy brightens right up without having to boost a lot of high end. I like this term

    Cut to make things sound better
    Boost to make them sound different.

    Jason
     
  6. cfaalm

    cfaalm Active Member

    RemyRAD said
    Would you be willing to share some knowledge on how you determine what sounds need how much compression?
     
  7. QuickDiscs

    QuickDiscs Guest

    Digital EQ takes almost twice the amount of cut for the human ear to hear it, due to the fact that there is no phase shift.
     
  8. RemyRAD

    RemyRAD Well-Known Member

    I would like to address QuickDiscs, you are incorrect with your knowledge regarding phase shift in digital equalization. There are 2 popular kinds of computer equalization, some are like what you believe them to be and others, most, are still like their analog counterparts. One is known as FIR equalization and the other is known as IIR equalization. One affects corresponding harmonics and the other doesn't. They both have their applications and one cannot assume what you have assumed.

    Now on to your question from cfaalm. Many of us who have been recording for quite some time generally know what we want to begin with. For example, I most always add some light compression, from 2 to 10 DB's at between 2:1 to 6:1 and/or limiting, just a couple of DB's at 8:1 to 20:1, to most contemporary popular vocalists. It really makes a difference in the sound when you do that going in as opposed to doing it when it's coming out. One can also, frequently do both, i.e. record the vocal on one track with processing and on another track clean, without processing if one is hesitant to commit during tracking? I don't usually do any of this with operatic talent, unless I'm trying to obtain a certain sound or style in the recording.

    I will frequently add a few DB's of limiting to electric basses, when taken direct, whether I'm using an active direct box or an output from the bass player's preamplifier, depending on the musicians technique used. I will also frequently use some type of limiting and gating on bass drum and snare drums. I like how it tightens things up. I also frequently invert phase on the bass drum for the change in texture it affords the drum mix (it creates a more solid thud then a flabby one). I also like adding a microphone to the bottom of the snare drum, also inverting the phase of that while mixing it in with the top microphone on the snare drum, usually on a pair of tracks, separately. It definitely adds more snap and snare sound and I frequently use a SDC like an SM 81 or AKG 451or just another SM57.

    If an electronic keyboard player utilizes too wide a dynamic range (which I have found frequently) I'll add some stereo limiting to the keyboards.

    Again, I cannot stress enough that when tracking with dynamics processing, LESS IS MORE. Depending on the situation and circumstances, I have also been known to track clean without adding anything until mixdown. I follow no particular formula except for emotional impact, convenience and spontaneity, unless a producer specifies otherwise. I usually also do not mix down with a stereo limiter across my stereo mix bus. I'd rather do that after I mix but for numerous live broadcasts of musical events, I have sometimes been asked to do just that (for numerous different reasons).

    Now don't misinterpret what I'm saying here as there are many different brands and type of limiters/compressors. Some have peak detectors, others have averaging or RMS detectors, some rely on optical ballistics. I have and use all of the above types by numerous different manufacturers. If I don't like what I'm hearing from one unit, I'll try the others until it tickles my years, ears and rear (thank God that last one is singular)! TMI!

    Nobody has ever really thrown me any curves but when they do, I roll with them, adapting along the way and never getting upset over what I may believe to be a peculiar request. It's always a learning experience and a fun challenge while strutting your stuff. The more obstacles thrown at me, the more exciting I find the job (of course there is always substantial stress involved but that's part of the job). Some people are very set in their ways and they don't do well with those kinds of situations. I excel at them.

    Everything old is new again
    Ms. Remy Ann David
     
  9. cfaalm

    cfaalm Active Member

    Wow, Remy, thank you for your elaborate answer. I enjoyed reading that. So I gather that you use (analog?) compression and limiting in a conservative way. That makes sense.

    I have read about reverse phasing the bottom snare mic and kick drum mic before. Somebody talked me out of reverse phasing the kick drum mic last session and now I think it sounds like crap. Fancy that. :D

    We still have another session ahead of us so I'll be cooking a little with your recipe. I hope we'll perform well enough to post some material.
     
  10. RemyRAD

    RemyRAD Well-Known Member

    That's pretty cool and always remember, you can still invert phase of the bass drum in mix down. Now, I don't always invert phase on the bass drum. I usually only do it when I want a harder hitting, tighter bass drum sound instead of that fatter, flabbier in phase bass drum sound which I still like depending on the music and the project involved.

    Looking forward to hearing your completed results.
    Ms. Remy Ann David
     
  11. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    I agree.

    This is very a interesting comparison between compressors/limiters and microphone filters. I much prefer tracking vocals with an LA2A to a plug-in comp on the vocal channel, ITB. "Vocals" always sound fuller and silkier through quality analog tracking. But I never thought about the HPF as a deal breaker in the same way. I can think of quite a few mics without hpf. Many engineers prefer mics without the filter.
    @Boswell others....
    What do think about hpf on the microphone? Do you use them and prefer a mic with that option?
    Is this subjective to the quality of the mic/ preamp and/or headroom ?
    Do you find a capture sounds better when the mic hpf is employed during tracking or ITB during mixing?
     

Share This Page