1. Register NOW and become part of this fantastic knowledge base forum! This message will go away once you have registered.

DBX 160 vs. RNC 1773

Discussion in 'Pro Audio Equipment' started by Johnjm22, Mar 23, 2005.

  1. Johnjm22

    Johnjm22 Guest

    I'm currently in need of a budget hardware compressor. I already have a DBX 160A and find it to be useful. But now I'm in need of another channel of hardware compression. I'm not sure if I should get another 160 or try something else. The only other quality comp I see for a good price is the RNC 1773.

    Are there any other good comps out there in the same price range as these units?

    Which do you guys think is a better the 160 or the 1773?

    Whatever compressor I do get will be used for tracking to tape (by tape I mean hardrive). I'll only be using light compression, just to level off some peaks. It will be used on Guitars, drums, vocals, ect. So I need a good all around compressor.

    Also, what's up with all the different versions of the 160? What's the difference between the 160A, 160X, and 160xt?
  2. bmf

    bmf Guest

    for this application - only light compression - i really like my old symetrix 525. it's smooth, glues everything together nicely and, depending on the threshold, can tame some light peaks quite well... you should get it used for round 80$. also a nice 2-bus comp for no money. the rnc is something completely different, i'd never use it like this.
  3. JBsound

    JBsound Guest

    As far as I know the only difference between the 160x and 160xt is that the xt has XLR jacks. Otherwise they are identical. The 160a is similar but uses a different VCA, so it sounds slightly different, and it seems most people prefer the x and xt over the 160a...I've never compared them though.

    I think in your situation, you might want to consider the rnc. The dbx's are nice, especially for drums, but not quite as transparent as the rnc compressor is. I use mine extensively for tracking just for taming the peaks, and it's barely noticeable. It doesn't perform well on bass, but for vocals, acoustic, etc, it's great.
  4. jonyoung

    jonyoung Well-Known Member

    Dec 31, 2003
    I have an X, an A, and 1773. The biggest difference for me is that the 160's have no attack or release controls, the RNC does. I usually mix with Sonar, but occasionally do a quick mix through the board. I use the RNC as a mainmix compressor at 2:1 or less, medium attack and fast release.......it makes for a very punchy mix :) The insert jacks on it are wired in reverse, so you can just run a pair of TRS cables to the L/R inserts on your board and voila!
    I also use the 1773 occasionally when tracking a really dynamic vocalist, it's very easy to dial in and get transparent results.
  5. Johnjm22

    Johnjm22 Guest

    Thanks for the replies.

    Right now I'm leaning twords the RNC. You can get two RNC's in a rack mountable chassis for $385, damn good deal.

    I'll also check out the symetrix 525.
  6. TeddyG

    TeddyG Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2005
    I was going to say that whatever you get, if it's another channel you need, get the same thing! Replace the DBX with two whatever's or just get an additional DBX, but I think that's what you just said you were going to do..?


Share This Page