1. Register NOW and become part of this fantastic knowledge base forum! This message will go away once you have registered.

Diff. between U87 and U89?

Discussion in 'Recording' started by Juergen, Aug 19, 2001.

  1. Juergen

    Juergen Guest

    Someone lent me a U89i, so I was wondering how does it differ from the U87? I don't own a U87, but I'll be having the U89i for a while. I tried to do a little search on my own, but haven't been able to find anything yet....apart from that it is a bit smaller than U87...

    Juergen
     
  2. bassface

    bassface Guest

    If you want to read numbers,charts and look at graphs, visit the Neumann website at http://WWW.Neumann.com

    I have both the U87 and the U89. They really don't sound much alike. The U87 as you know, is a studio workhorse which will usually sound good to excellent on nearly anything. The U89 is uh, less "colorful"--some would say colorless (or worse). Sometimes it's the right mic for some vocalists but I usually use something else. It does make a great room mic though--very natural sounding. I often put it in figure 8 for that application. I bought mine about 15 years ago for really cheap (from Klaus Heyne no less!). Although it's somewhat useful, I wouldn't consider it for a main mic.


    Bob
     
  3. dbock

    dbock Guest

    These mics ar similar in that they both have trapezoidal headgrilles and output transformers.
    The 89 uses a 3/4" capsule (like the tlm170 & 193) whereas the 87 uses a real 1" capsule. I've got a visual image of the sound of the U89: a layer of thick, clear film between you and the sound source.
    The 89 is a more technically "perfect" capsule, but somehow also less usefull for music recording. Go figure.
     
  4. Juergen

    Juergen Guest

    Originally posted by David Bock:
    I've got a visual image of the sound of the U89: a layer of thick, clear film between you and the sound source.
    The 89 is a more technically "perfect" capsule, but somehow also less usefull for music recording. Go figure.


    Yeah, I have noticed the layer of thick, clear film. I had never used one before, so after using it for the first time, I thought "where's the Neumann sound gone?" I think for the first session I was trying to convince myself that it was there, รก la 87, but that somehow the singer must have had a kind of voice where I just wasn't noticing it as much...

    ...after recording a few people more I have lost some of the excitement of owning a Neumann, well, borrowing it for an indefinite amount of time.

    I've found it sounds ok on acoustic guitar, which I was happy about. I think I am still grateful, though, considering that at this point I don't have a whole lot of mics.

    Thanks for y'all's help!

    Juergen
     

Share This Page