Mackie 1604 ( patchbay ) is this wrong

Discussion in 'Patchbays' started by BassLiK, Jul 2, 2011.

  1. BassLiK

    BassLiK Active Member

    Hi everyone, and Happy 4th. I have a Mackie 1604 I use as a monitoring setup, and a glorified patchbay with my Digi003 & Presonus Digi FS, since latency is introduced I have the players through the Mackie for monitoring, and I also will route recorded tracks back to the Mackie for external effects and a tube Pre Amp. I can record at 32 samples latency without the Mackie, which is fine and just eliminate the Mackie and use a patch bay for routing. It doesn't seem to introduce noise since I have all the trim knobs to the left, but it just seems practical for a routing mixer too me. Should I take the Mackie out of the chain and get a patchbay instead?
     
  2. Mo Facta

    Mo Facta Active Member

    I use a console and a patchbay and find them both indispensable.

    It's actually difficult to give you a definitive answer since they perform different functions. Why not wire all the i/o of your mixer and interfaces to the patchbay? It will most definitely optimize the total connectivity of your system.

    For interest's sake, here's a copy of my patchbay chartsd from a couple of years ago when I was using with our old Mackie Onyx 1640:

    567dcb3fd7b30ff48f3547d001b1148a.jpg

    374557f237c1196474340a097e686b60.jpg

    Hope that helps.

    Cheers :)
     
    audiokid likes this.
  3. BassLiK

    BassLiK Active Member

    Mo Facta, very nice routing. Thank you for responding and I will put patchbays on my list. Thanks again and have a great 4th.
     

Share This Page