1. Register NOW and become part of this fantastic knowledge base forum! This message will go away once you have registered.

My voice is too big. (Won't sit in the mix)

Discussion in 'Vocals' started by JohnTodd, Feb 17, 2013.

  1. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    Hi! Been reading, working, recording, and greatly increasing my skills as a recordist.

    But I'm having a problem. I'm doing a cover of Stairway to Heaven, and I can't get my lead vox to sit in the mix. It's either too loud or too soft.

    When I listen to Robert Plant's vocals in that song, they sound quite small. Still powerful, but small. That way he can do all that ad-lib stuff softly and still be heard. Because of compression and fader riding, I can hear the soft stuff really well while the loud doesn't get blown out.

    But my voice recording sounds huge in comparison. I usually low-cut the mics anyway, this time I've tried cutting even more but just get a low quality thin sound. I've changed the compression around, reverb., etc. but to no avail.

    Here is a clip of it:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/hmkd5hooh1uewqy/Stairway-test1.mp3

    or try this:

    https://dl-web.dropbox.com/get/Stairway/Stairway-test1.mp3?w=AAD4mj52I045HVx_DlY7bIO5F5oODjmFl1JAyCOlvm3Gww

    The recording isn't finished; I'm still learning the vocal part. Please accept my apologies for singing flat and stuff. It's a work in progress. Go easy!

    Mic is an SM57. Tried a ribbon, too. Didn't help. FX = low-cut, gate, Waves vocal rider, Waves API-2500 compressor on the bus, little bit of reverb.

    Thanks so much for your help!
    -Johntodd
     
  2. Blue Bear Sound

    Blue Bear Sound Active Member

    Your issue has less to do with "big" (ie, frequencies/tone) than it does ambiance. In a mix, the tracks have to sit in some sort of cohesive sonic space, even if the separate tracks were recorded in different spaces..... your individual tracks (including vocals) in that clip sound disconnected from each other, because you haven't created any cohesive soundstage for them to exist in....

    This doesn't mean wetting them all up with tons of reverb, but at the very least, it does mean creating ambiance using very short delays and/or room ambiance verbs.

    Sound doesn't exist in a vacuum, and that's kind of what you have happening in that test clip!

    More info on basic mixing here >>> Blue Bear Sound Recording Studio - ARTICLES - Mixing 101
     
  3. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    I agree 100% with Bruce, its all about creating a marriage with the whole song. ITB, using a few reverbs in steps ( early reflection with a room, small church or hall) and a delay with the right BPM would help. I would personally use more HPF on your vox. Some vocals fit better with less bottom end and yours is one of them. This is only based on what I'm hearing as the end result. Could be your, room, tools and proximity.

    I hear a wooly low mid all the time.

    An observation, there is a certain mud in the low mids that happens with your process. I've noticed this on your other tracks we've had so much fun with! Your vox should have a better sound on its own. Maybe singing further back might be a great benefit. Everyone is different. I think the 57/58 is a good move for your room but with that mic, doesn't a fast loss in proximity happen too so you can have a really inconsistent level? Hence, why we choose the right mic for the room, person and technique. Its been like 30 years since I sang through one.

    How close are you singing to the mic, John?
     
  4. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    I have two verbs on it. I am using the CSR Classic Room with a .54 sec. decay, and the CSR Classic Plate with a 3.195 sec. decay.

    I thought of using the room for everything and the plate for the vocals, since Remy loves plate so much. I like it too, now.

    As for singing close to the mic, I'm right on it with a double pop filter. I back off on the loud notes even with the Vocal Rider doing it's thing. I can tell a difference in the tonality of the voice when I do that. Perhaps I should pick a distance and not work the mic? I heard the "air" can be a subtle compressor. Do you think the proximity effect on the SM57 is causing the "hugeness"?

    I can experiment. This vocal is very challenging for me so I am rehearsing it many, many times before doing the final tracking. I can try many suggestions since I like to record the practice takes anyway.
     
  5. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    I just tried putting a "Linear Phase Multi Band" compressor on the vocal bus. The "wooly" seems to be from 200 to 500hz. I'm compressing that region and it seems to be less wooly.
     
  6. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    Your guitar sounds good. I would be shooting to get the vox closer to that sonic space. This is just a wild shot but who knows, Try reamping your Vox! That might just kill!
     
  7. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    Hey, you are here right now. Cool.. You hear that low mid yes?

    multibands, I wouldn't touch that on this track. You need raw vibe and a blend. Not suppression IMHO.
     
  8. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    Thats it! You can't eat the mic like that. Go back like 8in or more and crank the gain. You are going to be used to all that bottom in you ear so its not going to be easy. You'll need to turn your monitoring down so you can hear your softer passages better without eating the mic. This this will make a HUGE improvement! Do you need that vocal rider?
     
  9. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    OK, I'll skip the multiband. I'm going to retrack the vox anyway because I need to practice first.

    Yes, I am in session right now; I will keep checking this thread when I take (frequent) breaks. Thanks so much for being here!

    I just got a great sound on my nylon-string classical guitar! Cheap guitar, but I used an SM57 at the 12th fret and an MXL990 for the body and did the opening soft stuff with it. Killer!

    As for the Vocal Rider, I've found it to be essential. I think it is compensating for my lack of skill, or perhaps lack of a good room to record/mix in. Without it I get varied levels, with it the levels are smooth. This works better regardless of any compressor. My fave vocal compressor is the API-2500, but even it needs the Vocal Rider.

    I'm going to try and track some vocals now. Stay tuned, and thanks again!
     
  10. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    UPDATED NEW LINK

    Here's the latest, done 8" back from the mic. Still working on my vocal performance, but technically it sounds better.

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/hfxx4ix9mfzvv3v/StairwayToHeaven-test2.mp3

    PS, gotta adjust teh gate - it's dropping ends of words.

    Thanks!
     
  11. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    dead link
     
  12. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    Try it now
     
  13. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    tumblr_lnh30tpVJ71qm0swto1_400.jpg

    YOU!


    100%% smoke

    Now..NOW Oh Ya Baby! you are going to really tune into "your sound". Can you hear the space it added? I would even go back a bit more but this is it, John. Now you find the sweet spot between you, your pre, and the song. Make sure you never hit the red now. Happy mixing, I can see the smiles now!

    And reverb is next!
     
  14. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    Thanks!

    So is it picking up more room, or losing the prox effect, or both that is making the difference?

    It actually sounded better in the cans, too! I didn't feel like I was "singing into my own ears" this time.
     
  15. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    Thats it ! ALSO, why the 57/8 is the right choice for most studio's with average to good acoustics. All these high end condensers can be so problematic. Everyone is spending big money on condensers only to pick up their crapping sounding room(s). Yup, one can do better than most lol. What Remy has been saying all along. Yes, no? maybe so... A comment like that aught to tighten up the panties around here hehe..

    Anyway, The dynamic mic isn't picking up all that room reflection. Its getting a better picture between you and the mic. Thats why 57/58's are so awesome for live. They aren't picking the entire bar and band all around you. Make sense?

    Add a kick ass mic pre and converters in that and MAN, what a simple solution to great sound.

    So, before you were getting too much your face volume. Now you are getting the stuff in the air. This is the same idea around (gain staging, headroom, below the red on meters and ANALOG verses DIGITAL. All the stuff we don't see but is there and all the stuff digital is clamping onto that we don't want.

    I'm looking forward to more of your music!

    Cheers!
     
  16. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    I see..rather I can hear it now. Thanks!

    This is a fun song to do! Wait till you hear the Les Pauls kick in!
     
  17. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    The Shure SM57 helped take the room out of your mix while capturing you better. You then used the space between you and the mic like an eq. Further away, also helps you blend or wash away like room mics do with a kit. Up close like that puts you sonically out of balance with the music to ever glue well.
     
  18. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    Now on to drums - can't get the Bonzo sound!
     
  19. audiokid

    audiokid Staff

    Ya you can!
     
  20. JohnTodd

    JohnTodd Well-Known Member

    :biggrin:
     

Share This Page