Hi ! First of all, happy new year to all !!... This is my first post here and, i don't know if i have to introduce myself, i'd just say i'm an amateur who wants to make decent quality recordings ;-)... So, i need a 2 tracks recorder to record acoustic music (jazz, folk, classic etc. any genre !)... I read many posts about what i'm looking for... and i learn so many things here ! (thank you)... The Nagra V would be the perfect recorder for me... But the Nagra BB+ is smaller and cheaper... The BB+ is a Nagra, so it probably sounds very good. But how "very good" compared to Nagra V ?... If its sound quality is "close enough" to the Nagra V's, i'd probably better buy the BB+, then i can also get better high-end microphones, for the same budget !!... Here's my question, for those who knows both recorders : only considering the preamp and the ADC, is the BB+ "very good" enough for "quality recording" ? (even if for example it is "only" 20 bits ADC)... Or the pre and the ADC of the Nagra V are definitively better?... Thank you in advance !! t.