1. Register NOW and become part of this fantastic knowledge base forum! This message will go away once you have registered.

Rode K2 Question

Discussion in 'Pro Audio Equipment' started by eddies880, Dec 20, 2004.

  1. eddies880

    eddies880 Guest

    Ive been in the Vocal Booth section asking questions about mics-------------this question is about the rode K2.
    I placed it here hoping to get a quicker response.
    From what Ive read,the K2 is a great mic for vocals-------------my question is-------does the mic sound "too tubey" at times,ot does it have a natural sound do it??
     
  2. miks

    miks Guest

    ive got one and its a great mic for vocals and accoustic guitar. Its not tubey for me when i run it through a seb pre. I guess the preamp also plays a factor in how the mic sounds.
     
  3. David French

    David French Well-Known Member

    Ah a true Aussie patriot! I have a similar all-Aussie vocal chain of NTK, VMP-2000e. Nice.
     
  4. boheme6

    boheme6 Guest

    it does not have an exaggerated 'tubey' sound at all.. it's very smooth.
    "-)
     
  5. maintiger

    maintiger Well-Known Member

    I've been using it lately for vocals in omni mode- it just goes on forever.... the only drawback is that when a cruiser goes by with their subwoofers blasting omni mode picks it up and it ruins the take- still, doesn't happen that much so I can live with it, giving the results i get for vocals in omni :D
     
  6. you record your lead vox in omni with the k2 over cadiod?? why?
    i'll test it when i get to my studio but i've never recorded a lead using omni
     
  7. maintiger

    maintiger Well-Known Member

    I am working on a Cuban project and I found that the K2 in omni gives it a lotta 'air' If you are doing rock you probably should do cardioid to give it 'balls'- yet again, it would be worth a try to see what kind of sound you get in omni doing rock... experimenting sometimes gives you real cool unexpected results. I just did the omni thing for the heck of it and I liked what I got- it started by putting the mic halfway between omni and cardioid- I liked the sound I got there so the next step was to try it in omni and I liked it even better for the particular Cuban project i've been working on- :D
     
  8. ILOVESOUND

    ILOVESOUND Guest

    Would people say the K2 is a "great bang for the buck" mic or (and) a mic that is capable of getting truly pro results? If asked how it competes with U99s and L47s etc would the answer be: "It contends well", or "It is of equal quality"?

    When I first heard the C1 I thought it was a great mic for the money. Then after hearing other higher end mics it started to sound thin and lacking depth in comparison. I'm not interested in a "it's good or even extremely good for the price" type of vocal mic. I'm looking for something that doesn't compromise its sound in exchange for a lower price.

    Thanks

    ilovesound
     
  9. maintiger

    maintiger Well-Known Member

    in our sculture we can not get away from making comparisons where money is involved, as money is a yardstick that measures things that are 'good' or 'good for the money' I have not compared a K2 with a U99 or L47 so sorry I can not coment on that.
    I do have an RCA D77 and have access to U87's and I have chosen the K2 over those in a number of ocasions. It all comes down to the sound you want or need for the job at hand, and the K2 has a different sound than he other 2 mics, which by the way are the most wxpensive ones that I have access to at the present time.

    I also have a few other mics, nt1, 319's, gt55's. and I really don't use them much for what I use the K2, U87 or D77 the most: lead vocals. If I had a u99, which its a tube mic like the K2, perhaps I would like it better and use it instead- I don't know since I don't have one available. But I do go to the k2 at the present time a lot over the 87 and the 77.

    I agree with your comments on the c1 as it happened to me with the nt1 as well. I thought it was a 'good mic for the money' and by the way, it still is. It gets a tottally useable sound, especially when paired with good pres and Ad. But I won't go to it over the k2, 87 or 77. these mics are my current go to- so to partially answer your question the K2 produce for me results that are comparable, in my book, to what I get from the u87's and the D77 so I view it as a quality mic and not just 'good for the money' mic. As to if I would choose it over an u99 or not, I will answer that question when and if I get access to a 99. :p
     

Share This Page