1. Register NOW and become part of this fantastic knowledge base forum! This message will go away once you have registered.

Waves Q series x MC DSP Filterbanks

Discussion in 'Recording' started by Alécio Costa - Brazil, Aug 19, 2003.

  1. Alécio Costa - Brazil

    Alécio Costa - Brazil Well-Known Member

    Hi
    Have you guys compared these 2 nice products?
    I am digging deeper into Filterbank in the following days. I am very satisfied with thier compression plugs, like CB1/2/3 and now CB4.
    Some people reported that Waves Q series is better for cutting than adding .
    Hope to hear it from yours

    Nice week
    :)
    :c:
     
  2. Alécio Costa - Brazil

    Alécio Costa - Brazil Well-Known Member

    David? OPus? Doublehelix? little dog? Steve?
     
  3. kierankelly

    kierankelly Guest

    I always will go for the filterbank before the waves stuff. the waves EQs have nice shelving and do sound good for reduction. But The filterbank is more even in my opinion
     
  4. Alécio Costa - Brazil

    Alécio Costa - Brazil Well-Known Member

    sure. I have just realizd the same. This post is a little old alredy.lol
    I do like E6/P6. At E6 I dunno why we can not go with higher Q´s and HPFs/LPFS. So Waves Q series is still handy. But Waves Q4...Q10 are very sensitive to phase shift. Apply one or two HPFs to hot input signals and you ill see the nsty distortion it outputs -lol
    Ok, every eq does have overshooting, but never saw something so wild like with the Waves,
    It is nice to have another PT /02R guy here at the forum.
    Wellcomed!
     
  5. kierankelly

    kierankelly Guest

    so your experience was the same with the waves MCDS
    P stuff ?
     
  6. Alécio Costa - Brazil

    Alécio Costa - Brazil Well-Known Member

    sorry, I did not understand.. you ak me if I have similar opinion about the MAC DSP stuff?
    It sounds more natural to me.
    Hey, I am going to NY late October. If possible I shall phone ya bud!
     

Share This Page