I'm pretty new to recording, and I am not a very good or inspired writer, so I find myself doing a lot of covers of songs I like so that I can learn more about the process, and learn more about certain musical techniques, and get inside the heads of artists that are gods to me. So that is the early phase of my journey to become good at recording and become a better musician. My hope is that by breaking it down, deconstructing how a song is done, and then reconstructing it from scratch, using my own tracks, I can learn a lot. I also figure that if the song comes out sounding all lumpy, that I can't blame the song or the original recording; I then have to figure out why I made it so lumpy. I use that characterization because recording a song is a lot like making mashed potatoes; when you are first making them, they are lumpy, and it takes a lot of elbow grease to make them smooth. Seems to be the same with my music; it sounds pretty lumpy when I get all the tracks playing together for the first time, and then I work on it (forever) until it hopefully finally sounds a lot better. Un-lumpy. And once through that process if it sounds reasonably similar to the original, then maybe that is a mark of progress. Doing a cover removes the large unknown regarding whether a song itself is good or not from the equation. Its already good; the question is can I record a version from scratch and make it sound good. Or can I record it and make it sound somewhat like the original. This also gives me a framework to try different ideas; a clav in place of a funk guitar, for instance. So its a little like I am using the existing creation of a real artist (thank you, Herbie Hancock) as training wheels for me to learn a craft. That all seems to be working, to an extent. Now, if I wanted someone's advice here on the forums, could I post a track (which will likely be a cover) to get feedback (hopefully constructive)? Your thoughts are appreciated. Tom.