RECORDING ORG
Created for musicians by musicians
RECORDING ORG
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Sound Recording and Reproduction
Recording (live or studio)
Effects vs. Processors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Doublehelix, post: 62230, member: 49196"] I just read a *great* article in the February 2002 issue of Sound On Sound magazine regardingplug-insthat raised lots of questions in my mind about how I am currently using them. (I love articles that generate more questions than they answer!!!) Sound on Sound is a great magazine (U.K. based). Check them out at: [URL]http://www.sospubs.co.uk/[/URL] This article discusses the difference between effects and processors, and where they should be used (channel inserts vs. Aux buses). Also they go into a great discussion about plug-in order, and more importantly...*why* they should be ordered in the way they recommend, but that will be saved for another thread... Effects vs. processors: Insert points can accept *either* effects or processors, while send/return loops (aux buses) should only be used with effects. What is the difference you ask? OK...here goes. Effects are generally delay-based (reverb, delay, echo, pitch-shifting) or modulation-based (phasing, flanging, chorus, vibrato). Effects almost always have a "mix" control to balance the dry signal with the wet signal. The article contends that when using an effect through the send/return loop, the direct channel path for the dry sound is through the mixer channel, so the effect should be set with the mix control set at 100% wet (effect only) so that only the effected sound is added when the channel (post-fade) send control is adjusted. If the effect is used in a channel (group or master) insert however, the wet/dry balance is set up using the mix control on the plug-in itself. Now for Processors: Processors have no mix control, because **no dry signal is used**...the output is entirely processed. Some common processors are EQ, gates, compressors, panners, and resonant filters. If there is no delay element and no mix control, you can be pretty sure it is a processor *not* an effect. Because it is not desirable to add the processed sound to the dry sound, processors are only used in insert points. If the dry sound were to be added, it would at best reduce the intensity of the processor, and could introduce some really unpleasant artifects. Now none of these rules are absolutely "set in stone". After all, rules are made to be broken! But in general, according to the article, these rules are considered the "standard" that we should be following. To summarize: Aux Sends: reverbs, delays, echos, pitch shifters Inserts: EQ, compressors, gates, filters, distortion (or any effect) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What month just passed
Post reply
Forums
Sound Recording and Reproduction
Recording (live or studio)
Effects vs. Processors
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top