Record, listen, adjust, repeat until satisfied.

Sticking to 4-mic setup but also micing toms?

Overheads (or whatever you call them) for room sound? I hope your room sounds good.

100dB cut on all channels?

I'm a bit skeptical but looking forward to hearing samples.

Basher, post: 440988, member: 49973 wrote: engaged 100db cut on all channels

The silence must be deafening

Basher, post: 440988, member: 49973 wrote: Does this setup make sense?

Not from where I'm sitting

Are you sure you don't mean that you engaged a 100hz hi pass filter ?

DonnyThompson, post: 441013, member: 46114 wrote: Are you sure you don't mean that you engaged a 100hz hi pass filter ?

And why the heck would one put that on all channels by default, or on the kick at all?

bouldersound, post: 441014, member: 38959 wrote: And why the heck would one put that on all channels by default, or on the kick at all?

I'm not saying I know why... I was just guessing that he probably meant he was using a 100hz HPF on all mics, as opposed to attenuating all mics by -100 db. I could be wrong tho.

DonnyThompson, post: 441041, member: 46114 wrote: I'm not saying I know why... I was just guessing that he probably meant he was using a 100hz HPF on all mics, as opposed to attenuating all mics by -100 db. I could be wrong tho.

I know, I was directing that question to the OP. I could have written that better.

bouldersound, post: 441014, member: 38959 wrote: And why the heck would one put that on all channels by default, or on the kick at all?

You would be suprised...there is one guy on YT who I shall not name with a subscription channel who subscribes to a similar logic...

Some of the things this guy passes off on his channel to his subscribers as his "expert advice" is just laughable and defies common sense at times.

People actually take it on as advice like sheep without listening to the consequences of what is happening to their mixes.

I suppose that at this point, I would recommend to the OP that he post some audio samples, and then explain what he did (or didn't do) to get the sounds.

To the OP: There's not much we can suggest to you without hearing the tracks, particularly since some of what you mentioned in your initial post was confusing ( using incorrect terminology, conflicting info on the number of mics used, etc. ).
You can upload samples directly to this thread by clicking on the "upload file button" just to the right of the "post reply" button at the bottom of your post window. This will open your computer's directory, and you can pick the files you want to attach to your post.
RO's player will support mono/stereo MP3's up to 320kbps.
Be patient with the upload. It's not immediate. It could take as long as five minutes, depending on the file size and the speed of your internet connection.
-d.

Basher :
I think your post mesmerised my friends here because of how things are named.
I understand you are in fact using more than 4 mics if you add closed mics to the toms. I think you ment to use the 4 mics as principal source of sound and adding the toms Under it at low levels. This technic is valid, specially if your room sound good. But you can't say it's a 4mic setup unless you are in fact using just 4 mics...
Also, you talk about overhead as room mics. Man you've got to choose, either they are over (on top) of the drum and they are called overheads or they are somewhere else in the room and therefor called room mics. This is not to say that overheads won't pick up the room sound, but they if they are closer to the kit, they will pickup more of the direct sound than the room.
Having a second bass drum as sub is quite un-necessary if the first bass drum sound good. There is more to do with choosing heads, tuning and mic placement and phase alignment before you need to think about a complicated setup using a second bass drum.
Recording a drum kit with a 2 tracks is quite a challange. Plan for a lot of trial and errors.
As for EQ pointer, NONE can be given to you before we hear it. EQs are dependant of the instrument, the room, the mic and placement, the preamp and rest of the audio path.
We will gladly guide you if you post samples ;)

Yeah I did make that confusing, huh? Was tryin to convey my message quickly and get some quick tips I guess, but here is the real deal. For the individual channels, I used the 100hz HPF on all channels at first, to check which tracks needed it and which did not. I actually only used it on the kick to get rid of rumble and the snare so it was drier and had more body. With all THAT being said, all my multitrack attempts failed, so it was all for nought. Instead, I ended up using 2 CAD CM217's as drums mics, run through my Scarlett 2i2 2- channel interface. I couldn't find ANY drivers online for the Mackie Profx 22 I was trying to use, so had to improvise. Laugh if you will, but this sucker is clean and has great preamps on it. Not real bright sound, but that's OK. Gave me a nice blend of the overall kit. Now here's where you guys REALLY beat me up. Mic positioning. I put the left mic at shoulder level approx. 18 inches away. I put the second mic roughly 6 inches above the floor toms. shooting towards the snare. I measured the distance to make sure the mics were centered to the center of the snare. No phase issues. I'm not even gonna tell you what I used for a DAW til after you hear it (if it sounds decent enough). I'm looking for drum track critique mainly. The guitars in this one are horrid and we are re-tracking them this weekend. Thanks for all your replies. I take this recording deal pretty seriously and just want to sound good! (Don't we all?)

[MEDIA=audio]http://recording.or…

I forgot also, these are dry tracks straight into the DAW. No processing yet, if at all.

IMO It sounds very muffled...there is no "Air" to it whatsoever, and the mix is dominated by frequencies around the 140 -150hz mark.

I know its raw as you say there is no processing, but even the drum tracks sound a little muffled...your overheads mics should at least be giving you some room sound to the mix but I'm not hearing it. The drum tracks are dominating everything else in the mix...the vocal track is sitting too far back instead of sounding like its in the same room.

You really need to get some balance between the low end and the top end which gives you the air and shimmer it lacks...and I'd be looking around the area from 2khz up to get some of that air in the track and let it breathe a little so it doesn't sound like the mix is suffocating.

An increase around the 5k mark will give your vocal track more prescence, and should give you more attack on drum tracks, particularly your toms and kick.

With the vocal track IMO a little boost at 3k can help with clarity...I would cut at around 6k and boost around 8k->10k...this will help bring the vocals more up front.

Below shows your track on a Spectrum Meter...see what I mean about 140 - 150hz dominating the mix?...@140 - 150Hz you are @-24db and everything @2Khz and above is sitting at roughly around -65db.

IMHO of course ;)

Well that graph is certainly telling. Thank you for your research and mix opinions regarding the track. I checked my software's analyzer with this track to compare to yours and the results were almost identical, so that should be a reliable tool for me to use in future recordings. I'm gonna try your recommendations with a remix. I was hoping to get good mixes at home just for a decent demo we can shop around until we can come up with the scratch to get the recording done professionally. And I'll definitely be more aware of the room sound, the balance of highs, mids, lows, effects, whatever. Biggest problem is we have a small room so am limited. One question though. Would it work or be worth the effort to add a bigger room sound to tracks by playing them through a PA speaker in a livelier room and recording THAT to add air to tracks and mix them in with the original track for flavor? Thanks very much all of you for your posts and tips!

You could do that...or if your DAW has an impulse response library you could use that...or download the Bricasti Impulse library for free and use one of those to simulate a larger room.

http://www.samplicity.com/bricasti-m7-impulse-responses/

Just a quick add to what Sean mentioned; When using impulse responses you'll need a reverb convolution program to load the impulse responses into ... Something like Pristine Space, for example.

Basher, post: 441155, member: 49973 wrote: Would it work or be worth the effort to add a bigger room sound to tracks by playing them through a PA speaker in a livelier room and recording THAT to add air to tracks and mix them in with the original track for flavor? Thanks very much all of you for your posts and tips!

Besides the aforementioned mud, I didn't see anything about checking the phase. Phase continuity is the arguably most important part of setup after proper tuning.

For big reverb in small rooms just open the door to an adjacent room 1/3 of the way and put a mic outside the door facing the wall a few inches away. Your essentially micing the wall reflections and the result will be a much larger sound.