pro tools

Description
Pro Tools is a digital audio workstation developed and released by Avid Technology for Microsoft Windows and macOS. It is used for music creation and production, sound for picture and, more generally, sound recording, editing, and mastering processes.

Pro Tools on Mix Fest ?

Submitted by anonymous on Wed, 09/05/2001 - 19:02

Mixerman : I'm gonna mix "She's the Man "
Sometimes I use to change some sounds of the drums in the mix, with my Pro Stools (kick, snare mainly ), if I decide that this will add some sauce to the mix .
The question is : can we, for example, change the sound of the snare,bd, toms, etc, with Sound Replace,or similar, if we like to ?

Pro Tools performance concerns...

Submitted by AzureCrystal on Tue, 08/14/2001 - 03:12

Grateful thanks in advance for any help ! I have been evaluating PT Free for a few weeks now, getting ready to decide whether or not to invest in a DIGI001 system. I have some questions regarding features and performance, which so far are not up to par with other setups (Sonar & Tascam US-428, etc...) I have tested.

Pro Tools performance concerns...

Submitted by AzureCrystal on Tue, 08/14/2001 - 03:11

Grateful thanks in advance for any help ! I have been evaluating PT Free for a few weeks now, getting ready to decide whether or not to invest in a DIGI001 system. I have some questions regarding features and performance, which so far are not up to par with other setups (Sonar & Tascam US-428, etc...) I have tested.

pt 5.0 and pt 4.0

Submitted by Jaime on Wed, 07/04/2001 - 17:31

I have PT LE 5.0 (w/Digi 001) installed in my computer. I want to know that if i install PT 4.0 (w/DAE Power Mix) in the same computer, this last one will run OK and what precausions/problems i have to get in mind.

thanks
jaime

System: PT LE 5.0 (Digi 001), b & w G3, 350 Mhz, OS 8.6, 192 Mb.

Aerosmith & PROTOOLS!

Submitted by anonymous on Thu, 04/05/2001 - 19:17

I give a hats off to Aerosmith for recording their whole albums in Protools. I have no idea why this has been such a big issue with the industry for so long, people saying that "Its a great editor, BUT...", well if these boys dont prove that its the real deal, I don't know who else will. I have been using all digital for the last 5 years and if its done right, no one can hear the difference.

Mackie Bus or Pro Tools Bus?

Submitted by anonymous on Tue, 04/03/2001 - 18:40

I know this way somewhat discussed in another thread, but not exactly. What do you guys think would be better quality? 32 tracks to 16 PT bused D/A via AD8000 to a Mackie, or 32 individual D/A channels (no PT bus) of 888 to a Mackie? What I am trying to figure out is at what point does the busing on Pro Tools start to mess with the sound.