1. Dear Guest, if you haven't already... enter to WIN Samplitude Pro X4!
    Dismiss Notice

3 DAWs - 3 sounds?? Reaper vs Sonar vs Samplitude

Discussion in 'Computing' started by pcrecord, Feb 6, 2018.

  1. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    3 DAWs - 3 sounds?? Reaper vs Sonar vs Samplitude In this video, I test 3 DAWS by doing the exact same mix of the same song. There was a long debate as if every DAWs sounded the same and I thought it was time to get a true answer.

    I also give a link to downloadable multitracks songs.

    What do you think of the tests, convincing ??

     
    Johnny Blade, audiokid and kmetal like this.
  2. ronmac

    ronmac Active Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Location:
    Nova Sotia
    Tremendous effort was put into this comparison, so thanks for that. It can be a controversial subject, so I am guessing that your hit meter will be increasing...

    There is a clear difference, to me, in each of the samples, even those that had no processing. This sets off some questions and concerns...

    The main difference I hear (I haven't done any analysis yet) is the level mismatches, even in the un-mixed clips. Initially, I thought I may have been biased by seeing the text indicating what I was listening to, but I don't think that was it.

    I was even more convinced of a difference in levels when I listened to your null tests, and was surprised at how "full spectrum" the results were. If it was simple number crunching that caused the differences I would have expected to hear some anomalies, but not a full, or almost full, spectrum representation.

    Have you considered using a pink noise file as a test file, loading it into a few tracks and using the same processing as you used in the mix exercise? You could then do renders pre and post processing and see what level and/or frequency anomalies turn up.

    Thanks for challenging us;)
     
  3. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    A very good suggestion. When I get time I'll do that and post results here. !
    About the levels, I did set everything the same. This might meen, 0db isn't the same for all DAWs.

    What surprised me the most is that Samplitude sounds wider with more hi freq (kinda more air) and more dynamics. You can even see in the spectrum analyser that there is high frequencie harmonics above 20k that others don't have.
     
    Johnny Blade likes this.
  4. Makzimia

    Makzimia The Minstrel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2014
    Location:
    Hyde, England
    Marco,

    While I might accept in this case you showed a difference between these 3 DAWs. I would caution using a blanket statement. I'd also point out that yes, different DAWs do default in some cases to different pan laws and also different unity levels. Another thing to definitely consider is, there are major players used by the overall commercial side of the music and film industry. Those are used not just because they were the first, I am fairly sure :). A good video, just narrow and in need of more investigation. It's a VERY VERY big contentious argument to make mate ;).

    My opinion, FWIW,

    Tony
     
  5. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    Thanks Tony.
    Within the parameters of my tests which I clearly stated in the video, the results were different sounding files.
    I don't think I've made any claims other than this.
    Pan behaviours, level and even dithering were at play... That's for sure !
    But It was aimed at real users whom 99% won't go deep into the softwares to change those behaviours (if the software allows to make the changes)

    But frankly, I'm an IT (20 years). I work with computers since 1982.
    There is no way in my mind that the coding of audio softwares unless done the same will sound exactly the same.
    Manipulating audio is the goal of DAWS, makers take any route they wish to achieve results.

    I get your concerns, but we need not to go the opposit side and believe because we've been told. It's not a religion it's technology and science.. ;)

    Oh I just got another idea ! I'll make another video which will take the same audio file loaded and exported many times and see how the degradation of recompiling will affect the sound...
     
    kmetal likes this.
  6. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    Another thing than can change the sound is at what level the effects are processed. 32bit floating or 64bit floating or no floating..
    Oversampling shouldn't have affected the sound since I loaded the same presets...
     
  7. Makzimia

    Makzimia The Minstrel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2014
    Location:
    Hyde, England
    As I said, good video Marco :). You were thorough within those parameters.
     
    pcrecord likes this.
  8. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    I'm always happy to be proven wrong, that's the best way to learn ;)

    One obvious discovery is that Samplitude produce more High frequency harmonics above 20K which I can't account for anything but the quality of the engine.
    I will be transiting from Sonar to Samplitude soon.. this makes it even more exciting !
     
    Johnny Blade and audiokid like this.
  9. kmetal

    kmetal Kyle P. Gushue Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Location:
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Home Page:
    this is a great Vid Marco! something ive been wanting to do myself for a while now! i instantly heard a difference on my budget laptop speakers, on the un-mixed tracks. these tests illustrate exactly what ive been hearing and saying all these years, having used all of these programs.

    the clarity and openess of sampltude is what makes it so good, and reaper unbeateable price considered. if you could do adobe audition, i bet youd hear it sounds most similar to SAM, and pro tools, sounding most similar to cubase. PT?CB has that crunchy mid range, and tough top end. audition and sam have the least coloration of them all (imho) studio one sounds quite good too.

    i wonder if, the original tracking engineers had used sampltude, perhaps they'd have heard the slighlty strident mid/top on the vocals, and if yhe same would apply had you mixed initially in Samp. That would likely leave the other programs sounding dull, vs samp sounding bright. having a program like samp, which i believe is clear, not hyped, you can end up doing less processing to get to the final mix. theres a reason Mastering and Broadcast engineers often choose the Samp/Sequoia sound engine.

    this is an excellent real world illustration, that Daws dont sound the same, and especially out of the box.

    Protools gets used in film becuase of its integration with media composer, and the large scale Icon controller. Junkie Xl who does blockbuster soundtracks, uses an avid system as master for audio/video, with cubase and apollos for the 6 slave machines. Im not sure what you were trying to allude to as far as why they choose what they do, but none of those guys are arguing that its becuase theyre Daw sounds best, or distinguished. ita about speed, and deadlines at that level. My mentor did a song for the band NRG that was due for one of the Transformers movies soundtracks around 2012. the band missed the deadline by a day or two, and were not inlcuded on the motion picture soundtrack. To contrast, in order to maintain a deadline, Family Guy (a staple american animated show) producer Seth Macfarlane called into the studio while the VO artist was tracking, and was coaching him ect, thru a talkback rig my mentor patched up. That was done on digital performer. so its fair to me at least, to say that the comercial entertainment industry uses whatever is available, by and large. since they have a profit motive, and time is money. the record industry is the same, with the recent top 5's at Normandy/Wave Cave, being done on DP. I mention these things only because its me experience that the entire gaumat of Daws is being used at all levels. i was suprsied when surfing Major Studios websites a couple years ago, that a studio like sony, was still using an 02R and Nuemann 87, for one of their VO rooms.

    great points. it would be more strange if differently coded programs sounded exactly same. it would point to our gear not being accurate enough. Something i was wondering before i saw this video, was how the standalone mastering in ozone/t-racks, vs doing it in a daw differs soncially. i wonder if theres an audible difference. overall on your test, i prefered reaper, un-mixed, ans Samp, mixed. Your example reinforced my opinions on these Daws, and exemplify why they are my top two choices, (samp overal, reaper for value), with PT there for MC integration, and general file compatibility.

    excellent Marco. this is my favorite video, and something that really shows something people arent. i hope this gets alot of views on youtube.
     
    pcrecord likes this.
  10. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    I felt the mix in samplitude was sounding wider too. Instruments sounded more seperated with better presence.
    Yes audition could have been a good addition to this test. (can't do them all, I guess..)

    That's right, I would certainly mix differently with Samp than with Sonar.
    A thing to consider is that none of the mixes were mastered. A mastering job would certainly push more HF into Sonar and Reaper mixes and some M/S widening would be done too.
    Having samp doing a clearer and wider mix from the get go is very surprising to me !

    Thanks for the good words Kyle, it means a lot to me !
     
    Johnny Blade and kmetal like this.
  11. Boswell

    Boswell Moderator Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    UK
    Home Page:
    Nice work, Marco!

    The interesting point for me was that the Samplitude clip had an extended high frequency range compared with the other two. Have you tried looking at the spectra of each of the raw tracks to see which one had components at that amplitude in that frequency range? If there is one or more, why were the other DAWs not passing it through? If not, how was Samplitude inventing it?
     
    pcrecord likes this.
  12. dvdhawk

    dvdhawk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Location:
    Western Pennsylvania, USA
    Well done, Marco! Very intriguing results.

    I'd be interested in seeing what happens when each DAW uses the same set of stems output in such a way that they'd only need to be imported into each DAW and simply set at unity - to remove any mixing variables that might occur in the notation and recreating of a mix. Panned dead center, or completely in mono.
     
    pcrecord likes this.
  13. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    I'll check that, thanks for the suggestion !

    That's a test I want to do as well.. Eliminate the panning laws possible difference.

    It's seems a part 2 may be in order !! I'll gather all the suggestions ! ;)
     
    dvdhawk likes this.
  14. kmetal

    kmetal Kyle P. Gushue Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Location:
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Home Page:
    i think using tracks where the Daw that created them is known, would be helpful. it would give a benchmark of what the audio was intended to sound like by the creator. this would allow us to determine at least subjectively which daws were omitting, or adding to, the audio track. it wouldn't necessarily show which daw was flattest, but it would show how they color audio relative to each other. another thing id be interested in is if simple test tones null out between the different daws. this could show if a daw itself had a response curve. this could a bit more objectively help determine weather samplitude for instance, has a flatter/extended response, or if its hyped.

    a separate mastering edition would interest me as well to compare daw vs standalone mastering. just tossing ideas out there.

    looking forward to Pt. Deuce.
     
  15. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    This is interesting. It is my belief that the preamp and converter will color the sound but not the saving part on the hard drive, since the signal is already digital.
    I always thought differences would occure once you start manipulating the sound and not at the creation.
    That could be another aspect to pursue.

    Another thing I could check is how a DAW modify the audio file when importing it in a project IF the resolution isn't the same and a convertion is needed. Ex, loading a 24/44 file onto a 24/96 Project.

    You are giving me quite a to do list guys and I love it !!
     
    Johnny Blade and kmetal like this.
  16. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    Hey Guys !

    I've listened to you and made a few more tests.
    So here is part 2 :

     
    Johnny Blade likes this.
  17. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    Hope you find part 2 convincing ! ;)
     
  18. kmetal

    kmetal Kyle P. Gushue Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Location:
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Home Page:
    i really didnt know about different panning laws between daws, or never really considered their effect at least. Considering how common file transferring and conversion is, its a little disturbing about the effect of the hi end from samp in the demo. Waves plugs, all sound bright to me, and i use them all the time, its no surprise about the top boost on the CLA stuff. its part of the reason i use them, for that cut.

    this is really showing how much there is to learn about the tools we're using.
     
    pcrecord likes this.
  19. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    The Wave plugins were used only on 2 tracks, so I'm not imputing the HF boost only on them (althought they are the ones responsibles for high harmonics about 20K.
    I think in general Amplitude is more dynamic and revealing regarding audio quality..

    I remixed the last demo I did (young Rock/Emo group) entirely from samplitude and I had the same realisation. More open, more dynamic mix.
    I find it hard to adapt to the workflow.. but the sound is worth it...
     
    Johnny Blade and kmetal like this.
  20. kmetal

    kmetal Kyle P. Gushue Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Location:
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Home Page:
    dude the exact same thing happend to me. im messing with some older stuff while im getting everything setup. i noticed the openess, and a certain clarity. things seems to gel with less effort. between Samp, and the modern dsp, i notice a significant difference. Totally worth the learning curve, which has been slow, but relatively painless for me. its like when you get a new peice of gear, or record a killer take, all the sudden your an All Star, lol and didnt do anything different.

    it's also one of those things where you cant un-hear it.
     
    audiokid, Johnny Blade and pcrecord like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice