Analog to digital? Advice needed

Discussion in 'Microphones & Recording' started by ap-emerger, Apr 14, 2006.

  1. ap-emerger

    ap-emerger Guest

    Hello, first time posting here.
    Well, here's the scoop. I've got a home recording studio. It's an 8 track TEAC 1/2 reel to reel. It's powered by a kick-a$$ harmon Kardon tube. I've been using a decent mackie 16 channel mixing board, decent tube pre-amps, standard out-board effects rack.

    Now...Here's the problem: a reel of tape cost $77 bucks for 33 minutes. Also, analog is starting to show its age due to the mixing & mastering stages it becomes archaic.

    What I want to know, if someone wants to "cross-over" to the digital domain, what is the most inexpensive/ best sound/ ease of use, way to do it. I have looked at single unit Roland 8 & 16 track digital recorders used for a nice price. But, I've also considered stepping it up a bit and getting a Mac with Pro-Tools.


    Any advice is appreciated.


    Thanks
    AP 8)
     
  2. chrispick

    chrispick Guest

    The most flexible, customizable solution would be a computer running digital audio workstation (DAW) software. It's also the most expandable tool set.

    ProTools is one such solution, but certainly not the only one. Other capable, pro-level DAW softwares include Logic, Nuendo, Digital Performer, Sonar and Cubase, any of which may prove more affordable once all other elements are accounted for.

    Generally, all you need for a comp-based DAW is: a computer, audio sequencing/editing software (like those listed above), an audio interface (for MIDI and A/D conversion), monitors to listen and cables to connect everything. A/D converters can differ in the quality of their conversion, so if highest audio fidelity is an important issue for you, research to make sure you invest wisely.

    I don't believe it matters much which computer platform you choose; both Macs and Window systems are capable. Set-up is typically a little easier on a Mac since the OS is built to deal with it directly. A Win-PC will give you greater processing power at a lower cost. Short of that, both platforms are more alike than different when it comes to DAW work.

    Self-contained portable DAWs like the Roland units are very robust and durable -- they're constructed to perform one trick well, after all -- but they're more cumbersome than comp-based systems when it comes to editing audio. They also have limited expandability, especially regarding third-party mixing tools. One of the great aspects of comp-based DAWs is the array of add-on effects you can accumulate as your mix needs grow.

    My own experience: In the digital realm, I started out with a Roland VS-880. I've progressed to a Mac G5 running Digital Performer and use it for professional work. I've never looked back. And given that you've already invested in good front-end analog gear (pres, efx, etc.), I'll bet you'll feel the same way.
     
  3. ap-emerger

    ap-emerger Guest

    Thank you

    I really appreciate it!

    Thanks

    AP 8)
     
  4. alfonso

    alfonso Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2002
    Location:
    planet earth
    Home Page:
    The jump from an old tape recorder to a PT system is huge...I think that having some good quality dsp running along the main cpu is a very good idea, as long as you need some features of such a quality level that would seriously burden your system if running in a completely native way.

    I've found the system that fits my needs perfectly with the Creamware Scope platform. A couple of Scope Pro cards in a good PC and a sequencer of choice make a professional system with an incredibly good sound, the best synth emulations, samplers, processors, some of the best sounding stuff of the market, for a fraction of the cost of a PT professional system.

    If you are ok with a simple native solution or a laptop, well, you can have a lot with that solution, but if you need something else to the point you start thinking of throwing in lot of $$$...well, consider a Scope system first, it's maybe better than PT (my opinion), much more flexible and incredibly featured.
     

Share This Page