Fat32 or NTFS(?)

Discussion in 'Recording' started by yodermr, May 3, 2002.

Tags:
  1. yodermr

    yodermr Guest

    Quick question. I read the Win2000 optimization guide. From that I think the OS hardrive gets formatted NTFS(?) and the sound drive gets FAT32. The harddrives are Deskstar 120gxps. Tring to format the sound drive FAT32. I keep getting errors that say the volume is too big. Does Fat32 have some limitation? The drives are 40gig. I went ahead a formatted it as NTFS(?) to make sure that something worked. That worked fine.

    Mark
     
  2. Opus2000

    Opus2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2001
    You know..I need to change that optimization guide on that aspect. I reccomend going with NTFS for two reasons..
    One...file security from internet hackers!
    Two...if you accidentally erase data you can use a program called Restorer2000 or UndeletePro to recover those files!

    There isnt any performance difference between the two anyways. NTFS it is!
    FAT32 does have a 32GB limitation so that may be the issue at hand. You can format drives larger than 32GB as FAT32 but I can't remember what the issue was to get it to work properly.
    Opus
     
  3. steveho222

    steveho222 Guest

    Here's how:

    Boot a Win98 boot disk
    fdisk and say "Y" for support for large drives
    Partition the whole drive
    Reboot with Win98 boot disk
    format D: /z:64

    That will allow you use a larger drive formatted under FAT32. I currently do this to format my 60GB drives for my Win2000 DAW.
     
  4. Opus2000

    Opus2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2001
    Nah...I tried that and didn't see any improvement at all on the z:64 switch...NTFS..that be the way to go!
    Opus
     
  5. steveho222

    steveho222 Guest

    Yes it doesn't improve anything, but it should let you format beyond the 32gb.
    Steve
     
  6. Opus2000

    Opus2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2001
    Oh yeah!! A very valid point! lol :D
     
Similar Threads
  1. garysjo
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    518
  2. Tommy P.
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    499
  3. b3bub
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    861
  4. gabitzu
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    949
  5. Lloyd McKean
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    770
Loading...

Share This Page