Legal difference between Music and Lyrics??

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by CasBK, Sep 18, 2007.

  1. CasBK

    CasBK Guest

    When one person supplies the music (chords, beat, arrangement, instrumentation) and another person writes the lyrics and composes the vocal melody, who is considered the "writer" of the song?

    Generally speaking, is the writer of the lyrics and vocal melody entitled to a greater share in performance royalties than the person who composed the music bed?

    Do both the music composer and the lyric writer each file their own copyright with the library of congress, or is there a joint copyright to be filed?

    I have read Passman's book, and lots of others, so I'm not looking for a book referral. I'm curious about how this type of deal is COMMONLY done in TODAY'S rock and hip-hop music industry.

    Thanks in advance...
  2. MadTiger3000

    MadTiger3000 Active Member

    Nov 16, 2004
    Technically, the actual "song" is the lyrics and vocal melody, and ALL the other things are the arrangement.

    (People use the term "arrangement" incorrectly oftentimes in that they are just talking about the order of the verses, choruses, bridges, etc.)
  3. Anthony_Gore

    Anthony_Gore Guest

    The music is just the melody (usually vocal melody) plus any significant instrumental hooks (e.g. a riff). The chords, arrangement, instrumentation etc are not considered part of the song.

    Neither the writer of the music or the writer of the lyrics is necessarily entitled to more than the other. It depends entirely on the agreement they made when writing the song. Most commonly its a 50/50 split.
  4. Paula

    Paula Guest

    These are great questions! I would love to know the answers also!

Share This Page