Mesanovic 2 on vocals

Discussion in 'Vocals' started by audiokid, Apr 9, 2017.

  • AT5047

    The New AT5047 Premier Studio Microphone Purity Transformed

  1. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    thatjeffguy likes this.
  2. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
  3. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
  4. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
  5. DonnyThompson

    DonnyThompson Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    Akron/Cleveland, OH
    Home Page:
    From what I'm hearing here, it sure sounds great to me. I love the midrange response. In that way it's actually similar to an ELAM 250, and that's certainly not a negative comparison.
    ( I was listening through studio mons in a treated room). The clarity and detail is beautiful, ultra smooth mids, with a nice low end that doesn't get muddy.

    Also, the price is right. $1000 for a great sounding condenser, that has properties similar to those "holy grail" classics is a very fair price.

    I see it being popular in both mid level production facilities and uber pro rooms alike. The majority of those home recordist who are currently happy with their $60 AT2020's or $80 Behringer condensers wouldn't be a target, nor would the bulk of those budget studios ever think about dropping a grand on one mic alone, anyway.

    Time will tell but this mic might be a serious player in the next crop of pro mics under $1500.
    IMO
     
  6. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    Aren't they ribbons ??
     
  7. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    They think they are happy because they don't know better ;)
     
  8. DonnyThompson

    DonnyThompson Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    Akron/Cleveland, OH
    Home Page:
    Yeah, Mon Ami' ....that was a stupid typo on my part, pal... I was down a few too many quarts of coffee this morning when I wrote my post.

    But, I was serious when I said that it does have some qualities that make it similar to a few old condensers - as mentioned, particularly in the mids... I think it sounds very "ELAM -ish" in the mid-range.
    It also has the rich bottom end, similar to a U47 Tube.

    ( Just so guys know, I'm making the comparison based on experience - I have had the luxury of working with both those classic mics a few times over the years - but always at someone elses' studio, I could never afford them myself.)

    My memory is still very vivid, of the first time I ever worked with an ELAM 250 - The guy that owned it had a dumpy little studio in Youngstown, Ohio - actually, he had two that he purchased from an auction of gear that Capitol Records was selling off back in the late 70's... IIRC, I think he mentioned that he paid like $400 each for them ( bastard! LOL) although one of the power supplies was cooked, so he couldn't use them together - the two mics worked fine, but the power supply for one was toasted).

    I'm not saying that the Mesanovic sounds just like a Telefunken ELAM - but in the mid-range it sure does, or at least from what I can tell from the links that Chris posted here. ( @audiokid ).
    That was the very first thing I noticed about it, actually.

    At some point, I'd kinda like to hear a full comparison between an ELAM and this Mesanovic mic - I realize that the mic types are totally different, apples/oranges, but that mid-range on the Mesanovic is very similar to the Telefunkens I've used in the past, at least to my ears, anyway.

    IMHO of course.
     
  9. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    Indeed. The mid range in these examples sound stellar. That was the first thing I noticed. Wow.
     
  10. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    No doubt.
    I'm so much into the U47 flavor that if the USD exchange rate wasn't so high and I'had the money, I would order this kit :
    https://microphone-parts.com/collec...s/v47-tube-microphone-kit?variant=15070110470

    400$ ?? OMG !!!
     
  11. DonnyThompson

    DonnyThompson Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    Akron/Cleveland, OH
    Home Page:
    Yeah, I know. It kinda made me throw up in my mouth a little when he told me that. :sick:

    So, the kit that you just built several months ago... wasn't it a U47-ish thing... ? Or am I mistaken on that?
     
  12. DonnyThompson

    DonnyThompson Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    Akron/Cleveland, OH
    Home Page:
    It's also the first thing I notice on cheap mics, too... only I notice how bad the mids sound. LOL.

    It seems to be - in my own experience - that getting lows and highs seems to be easier for mic manufacturers to get right, but it's always the upper mids that presents the most difficulty.... or am I wrong on that?
     
  13. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    Precisely my thinking too.
    the uppers are where human ears are most sensitive but I would say all mids are equally important, just some are more noticeable to humans.
    Good mid-range makes all the difference. Adding top and bottom end freq can be pushed with EQ but honky savage mids just suck no matter which way the EQ goes.
     
  14. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    To add more, this was the first thing I noticed with the better ADDA converters. It shed light on discovering how mid range became a domino effect meaning, if I hear mids in detail, the DAW can easily shape the top and bottom curves, especially on the master buss.

    This is another reason why I've migrated towards 2 DAWs, second DAW to master. DAW1 prepares mid focus and DAW 2 polishes. The analog gear in the middle is where dedicated mid range spacial processing shines most.

    The older I seem to get, my ears seems to crave more refined mids. I think when we are younger, and have the ability to hear top end more, we are also more prone to be distracted from midrange detail. Since I don't have the ability to hear as well, mid range that is culttered, is really cluttered to me now. Thus why I am so focused on everything quality mid related. Avatones, MEQ-5, Taylor 714ce , good converters etc etc etc, These microphones now too...

    Its addicting lol. Or better said, really important for me because I understand how crap mids effect a mix... you have to ^#$% everything up around it. One bad apple spoils the batch.
     
  15. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    Yes a FET version (T47).. Call me crasy but I'm so much into it, I'd like to do the tube version !! ;)
     
  • AT5047

    The New AT5047 Premier Studio Microphone Purity Transformed

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice