mixer into computer

Discussion in 'Consoles / Control Surfaces' started by Sanoz0r, Sep 21, 2003.

  1. Sanoz0r

    Sanoz0r Guest

    Hi ppl. :)

    Tell me, why isnt this recording setup ever used (or is it?):

    inputs (drums, guitars etc) > mixer (and preamsp, effects etc) > computer > monitors
    where inputs from the mixer are grouped and then sent to inputs on the computers soundcard (obviously im talking a multi input card, eg: Waveterminal 192M)

    i would think this to be very useful because now you will have individual (sp?) recordings of each instrument (drums, guitar etc) on your computer, even after passing them through a mixer

    you see i dont like working with software mixers, it takes alot of the fun out :p . so i was wondering how my above example would work.
  2. drbam

    drbam Guest

    Many people work this way. If fact I know more people who utilize mixers and consoles than those who work strictly "in the box." However, obviously the quality of your input signal is dependent on the quality of your mixer.

  3. launchpad67a

    launchpad67a Guest

    This set-up is used all the time. But for me I still like to have my hands on faders and knobs, it just seems to be more real!
    I only use the computer for mastering. Wavelab is the only mastering software to own.

    Your method of recording to the computer is just fine. Watch your gain staging, it can get tricky!!


    PS: drbam, I'm getting ready to build a home in Prescott!! Mabey we could get together. I'm at Lake Powell right now.
  4. Sanoz0r

    Sanoz0r Guest

    Is the Behringer eurodesk 24 channel 4 bus(MX2442A) mixer of high quality?
  5. Rod Gervais

    Rod Gervais Active Member

    Jun 8, 2003
    Central Village, CT
    Home Page:
    Oh sh*t.......... someone said the "B" word....... :D :D :D

  6. AudioGaff

    AudioGaff Well-Known Member

    Feb 23, 2001
    Silicon Valley
    Compared to what? Compared to the pro stuff like an SSL, API and Neve - NO. Compared to the Biamp and Peavey I used to own and use in the 1980's - Yes. If your just a guy wanking at home then it is likely to be more than good enough. It works much better if you use outboard preamps and eq and just use it for monitoring and mixing.
  7. Sanoz0r

    Sanoz0r Guest

    and how about soundcraft mixers?
  8. Clueless

    Clueless Guest

    I've gone down this road (expanding from computer to outboard mixer) and am happy to have taken the path. Step one, I bought a Mackie 1604 on ebay. A cheap way to see if the workflow got better. It did. But, I was disappointed with the EQ, so I started reading the net and reviews and concluded that nothing less than a Soundcraft Ghost would do for me.

    However, the Ghost is just a little to large for the space I had to allocate, so for more money, I got a smaller board: the Midas Venice. Wow! It's like walking into the room instead of listening in from the outside (as on the Mackie). I'm sure the Ghost is a nice board too, but believe it when the Midas folks say "it doesn't matter how many knobs are on your EQ, it matters what those knobs *do*".
  9. drbam

    drbam Guest

    >>PS: drbam, I'm getting ready to build a home in Prescott!! Mabey we could get together. I'm at Lake Powell right now.<<

    That'd be great. email me at drbam@cableone.net
  10. Sanoz0r

    Sanoz0r Guest

    Thanks for all the help guys... but just one more question:

    what sound card should i use? im guessing itll need to be at least 8 channel input?
  11. drbam

    drbam Guest

    >>what sound card should i use? im guessing itll need to be at least 8 channel input? <<

    I use an recommend an Echo Layla 24. Excellent unit, solid drivers and very good support.

  12. Kurt Foster

    Kurt Foster Well-Known Member

    Jul 2, 2002
    77 Sunset Lane.
    Another soundcard that works great, is expandable to 32 inputs and has wonderful drivers is the Frontier Dakota. But you need to get some outboard converters for it as it is only an ADAT light pipe sound card and does not include converters. I use this set up with a pair of ALESIS AI3 converters and it gives me 18 simultaneous 24 bit inputs and outputs that sound pretty good. I’m into the whole shabang for about 1100 bucks, which is relatively inexpensive for what it does. An 8 channel set up would run about $700.

    As far as the mixer question, the main reason that a lot of folks are going strictly "in the box" is the expense and physical space that is entailed with having a mixer. Also to be considered is the quality issue. IMO there just aren't any mixers available for a good price that sound very nice. The exception to this would be as sited, the Midas and perhaps some offerings from TLA and Crest. All the Mackie, Behringer and other stuff like that might be fine for PA work but when it comes down to recording I feel they fall short of the mark. I have chosen to invest in a bunch of quality front end like pres, eq's and compressors and I cheaped out in the mixer department by using a Mackie SR24 only for headphone mix's and for no latency monitoring while tracking. Nothing that is ever recorded goes through the Mackie. For this, it works fine. I then mix in the box, coming out via spdif to the stand alone CDr recorder.
  13. Clueless

    Clueless Guest

    Yup...this is what first drew me to using an out-of-box mixer--ya just can't track accurately through digital. And this is what pushed me beyond mackie: ya just can't record through a Mackie. I'm still early in the Analog+Digital world for tracking and mixing, and some days I love life and some days I hate it. I think I love it more than I hate it.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice