1. Dear Guest, if you haven't already... enter to WIN Samplitude Pro X5!
    Dismiss Notice

Pines of Caroline

Discussion in 'Mixing & Song Critique' started by joulupukki, May 6, 2020.

  • AT5047

    The New AT5047 Premier Studio Microphone Purity Transformed

  1. joulupukki

    joulupukki Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2019
    Location:
    Utah
    Home Page:
    I'm working on an original bluegrass tune and trying to get the mixing right to make sure there's space for everything. I haven't added any compression or reverb, but have used the EQ on the separate tracks and some panning. Is anything sticking out like a sore thumb that you can hear that I should fix?

     

    Attached Files:

  2. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    Good job ! I like it..
    I feel the vocals are a bit to loud for the rest of the band..
    Also you could add a bit of reverb on the whole mix, it would put everything in the same space.. (althought I like this clean version too.. )
     
    joulupukki and audiokid like this.
  3. joulupukki

    joulupukki Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2019
    Location:
    Utah
    Home Page:
    Thanks for the feedback. I re-recorded everything in a different room. The vocals are probably still a bit too loud ... maybe? I also added a tad of reverb.

     

    Attached Files:

  4. joulupukki

    joulupukki Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2019
    Location:
    Utah
    Home Page:
    In general when you're mixing bluegrass songs, should the rhythm guitar be panned to one side or the other? Right now I have the banjo panned a little bit left, the mando panned a little to the right. I have the lead vocal right in the center with tenor and baritone vocals just off center (on each side). The guitar part plays rhythm the whole time except for when it has an instrumental break. Just wondered if there are certain techniques there?
     
  5. Kurt Foster

    Kurt Foster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Location:
    77 Sunset Lane.
    i like the second performance better but the first take has better acoustics. are you recording everything at once or one at a time?
     
    joulupukki likes this.
  6. joulupukki

    joulupukki Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2019
    Location:
    Utah
    Home Page:
    Thanks Kurt, I think my ears are just untrained. :)

    The first one I recorded from my home office, which is somewhat sound proofed, but not treated acoustically - a carpeted basement room. The second one I experimented with recording in a walk-in closet with board games & blankets on the shelves.

    Each track was recorded/performed separately by me - one at a time, of course. ;) I spent more time on the performance part on the second one doing multiple takes.
     
  7. Kurt Foster

    Kurt Foster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Location:
    77 Sunset Lane.
    cool stuff. try doing the instruments in the office and the vocals in the closet. i think that might sound pretty good. vocals should always be loud enough so you can still hear them when you turn the whole mix way down.
     
    joulupukki, Boswell and audiokid like this.
  8. Boswell

    Boswell Moderator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    UK
    Home Page:
    You've done really well there - it's a good toe-tapper. Kurt's suggestion of mixing the recording acoustic around between the vocals and backing instruments is an interesting idea.

    Could you tell us what microphone(s) and pre-amps/interface you used for the takes that make up this track?

    Personally, for this type of material, I miss having a fiddle doing a few turn-arounds, one of the breaks and then off-beat double-stops for the rest of the song. If you are not a BG fiddler yourself (no shame in that!), it might be worth seeing if you could get one to come in as a favour and do a different version of this tune, probably dropping either the guitar or the mando break.
     
    joulupukki likes this.
  9. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    I like the second mix better.. more upfront.. better balance.. keep up the good work !
     
    joulupukki likes this.
  10. joulupukki

    joulupukki Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2019
    Location:
    Utah
    Home Page:
    Thanks. I'll have to try a couple other recording / mixing variations.

    The mics I'm using:
    - Shure KSM32 on vocals, banjo, and bass
    - sE Electronics SE5 on guitar, mando (and the initial banjo intro)

    In the 2nd version of the song I recorded the instrumentals with both mics simultaneously just to have a couple options

    I'm recording through a Zoom H6 directly into Logic Pro X. Then, I'm using a trial version of FabFilter plugins (EQ, Compressor, De-esser, Limiter, and MB). Mostly I'm just trying to learn how to get better sound out of what I've got ... and get my song into a presentable state. ;)

    I could record myself playing fiddle, but we'd need to wait a few years before *that's* gonna sound any good. Haha. I know a couple other players though I'm not sure they're set up with any recording equipment. I'll have to see what I could experiment with there. For sure I'd love to have a bit more variety!
     
    pcrecord likes this.
  11. Boswell

    Boswell Moderator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    UK
    Home Page:
    You've done exceptionally well if you recorded all that through the H6, especially if it's like the other devices in the Hx range that drop to being 16-bit when used as an interface.

    Here's a thought: could you try posting a version that is the same as your V2 but with the mandolin muted during its break? That way, others here might be able to add a fiddle break in the gap and re-post it. Just for fun, you understand.
     
    pcrecord likes this.
  12. joulupukki

    joulupukki Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2019
    Location:
    Utah
    Home Page:
    Ah, interesting. I hadn't realized I'm compromising on the amount of info being piped into my computer. I got rid of an older Presonus FireStudio because it was an older Firewire interface that I couldn't use anymore. I'm sure it would have been able to do 24-bit. I'll eventually get something like the Presonus 24c or Scarlett 2i2 for a better (but still inexpensive) interface.

    Ok, sure. I'd be curious how the fiddle would sound in there. Here's a blank slate in that spot...

     

    Attached Files:

  13. Kurt Foster

    Kurt Foster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Location:
    77 Sunset Lane.
    i wouldn't worry that much about sample rate. you've already proved you can make good recordings at 16 bits. :LOL: can you use the vocals on the second take with the instrumental tracks off the first?
     
  14. joulupukki

    joulupukki Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2019
    Location:
    Utah
    Home Page:
    Good point. :) I could, but since I have those instrumentals more figured out how they could be, I'll probably just re-record them in my basement office.
     
  15. Kurt Foster

    Kurt Foster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Location:
    77 Sunset Lane.
    i'm a big fan of not running things into the ground and keeping the warts and farts. it would only take a few key strokes to try. you might find magic ....
     
  16. Boswell

    Boswell Moderator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    UK
    Home Page:
    Thanks for doing that. I'll see what I can come up with over the next few days....
     
  17. Lovemonkey3833

    Lovemonkey3833 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2020
    Location:
    Chicago
    If you are looking for a new interface let us know and we can certainly help! I wish when I started out someone helped me pick out the best products I could afford. Price seems to be a matter here as you said (but still inexpensive). Can you define inexpensive as in "I wont go over$$$$ as my absolute, if I save and stretch every single penny and sell my $*^t gathered in the attic price! For me and my next interface that's $3300. For you that could be $300 IDK. Both of those numbers are small numbers! The interface I want is something like $15,000 and it doesn't even come with any mic pre's! On to the next.
     
  18. Lovemonkey3833

    Lovemonkey3833 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2020
    Location:
    Chicago
    So this sounds pretty great if it's your intro to recording!
    Have you mastered EQing on digital vs analog equipment? It's far different! As on analog you didn't have to make room for things! Even if you say, run your mix through an SSL console and mixed digitally post console, you still didn't have to worry so much about making space for your instruments! But mixing completly in the box(computer)you have to make space for things! For instance with panning, with boosting 2khz to make the vocals pop out a little, then you duck 1db of 2k on you background ot leave space for the vocals, etc.
    Another thing is to put a Tape Sim plugin on your master fader before you start mixing, and an SSL buss compressor(style they've got good free ones to try, and pretty sure Logic has simulations included in their software, just youtube it you'll find it)and mix into those 2 things! So everything goes into those before you start eqin'g and everything! It needs some compression and tape to GLUE everything together! Did you put that reverb on a bus? Have you tried Delay instead of reverb? And have you tried automation yet? Look into those 2 things! I like your panning, vocals still need to be gelled out a little bit! Needs some overall compression IMO with some Vintage vibe going! Also try adding a little bit of saturation to you master buss/mixbuss, whichever you prefer! Don't be shy about FREE plugins too! There are great ones out there that can get really close to FABFILTER eq, and sound better on the compressor end! Not sure about a good free Tape sim though tbh! I use UAD AMPEX or STUDER tape plugins the most, then OVERLOUD TAPEDESK, MCDSP makes a great one for $50 which is cheap called Analog Channel. But like I said there's great FREE stuff out there you just gotta look around for it! It's 2am so can't think of em right now.
    But I don't think you need to re record you stuff at all! I think you need to refine you mixing just a tad! Thing's like I just said, and volume automation, reverb automation, delay automation, etc! Phatten up that lead vocal by steroizing it and with a slapback delay rely fast on the left, then throw another on and change the time of it slightly and detune it slightly as well and pan that one to the right with a slightly longer time than the left. That's one way of phattening up the lead vocal, among many others to try!
    TRy, Try , Try....gotta try a bunch of different things till you find what you like, and what will actually be perfect FOR THIS SONG!
    As every song is different, and what will work in 1 part of the song may not work in another part of the song! That doesn't mean it won't work, that just means you'll have to automate it!
    Also try running your jo and vox through an amp sim, and you can automate that as well, especially for vocal parts! It can work wonders!
    Also bear in mind I'm not saying that you NEED to get any plugins! All I'm saying is that if you don't find what you need in your existing pluigns that come with your DAW, there are plenty out there that are FREE GREAT PLUGINS!
    Plus it's nice to find new stuff to get motivated to mix, and plugins can achieve that in some manner. Kinda like getting a new instrument or piece of gear!
    Here's a great example of that! However in ProTools there isn't a plugin that can operate like Fabfilter! I know that Logic has some GREAT plugins that come with it, and they sound very good as well! Think they even have an SSL buss compressor clone! Don't quote me on that though as I don't use, nor have I ever used Logic(have used many others from Reason to FL Studio, Samplitude,






    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfWppzEzq1E
    Now this guy is not a go to in anyway, he just had 1 plugin I think will help you with the above method=The CamelCrusher!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5rqhurtryE
    Nadir is a must have freebie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg3ooIKpjus
    Span and TDR compressor are must haves IMO.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJkLSQBVzGs
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCWne_LzZO0
    This one is one of the most important ones on this list! NOVA is a great FABFILTER free plugin replacement! Try it! As well as the TDR stuff! Anything from them is great, Melda, Blue Cat Audio, Plugin Alliance, Izotope,
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfdO-5oPGK4
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8ot_rrCkNs
    The Ignite Amps has a good PULTEC EQ for free with tube saturation!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe7bbZxITPI
    Analog Obsession
    https://www.patreon.com/analogobsession/posts
    I hope some of this was helpful! Don't worry a lot about where you pan your stuff! If it sounds good great!
    Panning isn't gonna make or break your song! Many professional mixers only pan 100% or no pan at all!
    But .....it's still a useful tool IMO! Just not THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE!
     
  19. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    Recording is first about, the performance, the room acoustics, the mic choice and placement and preamp..
    I wouldn't spend night and day using 2000 plugins trying to fix it in the box.
     
  20. joulupukki

    joulupukki Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2019
    Location:
    Utah
    Home Page:
  • AT5047

    The New AT5047 Premier Studio Microphone Purity Transformed

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice