1. Dear Guest, if you haven't already... enter to WIN Samplitude Pro X4!
    Dismiss Notice

Running into so many problems

Discussion in 'Mixing & Song Critique' started by DKAUDIO, Dec 1, 2016.

  • AT5047

    The New AT5047 Premier Studio Microphone Purity Transformed

  1. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    Hey guys, I'm working on a mix of my cover of "Superstition" by Stevie Wonder. I think the vocal might be a bit low in the mix and a bit too congested around 300-500k/not bright enough. I used my new Telefunken Elam 251 and for the price, I'm trying to make decisions about wether or not I should hold onto it or go with another vintage tube that suits my voice. Feedback is greatly appreciated!!!

    https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzEh0K89oHfFQm4td24wQWg1VTA

    Thanks!
    David Korn
     
  2. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    Hi David, if you upload audio to our server, you will get a better response. FYI, I did try to go there but it asked for permission.
     
  3. pcrecord

    pcrecord Quality recording seeker ! Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Home Page:
    I can't access the file either...
     
  4. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    So tbd i'm feeling a little frustrated.. Ive been searching for the right mic and preamp for many years now and have had zero luck. I just recently purchased the Advanced Audio remake of the Telefunken 251 for about $1000, and every review online raves about Advanced audio and this mic. I had been looking for a tube mic for so long that gave me that full bright tube sound with character and smooth transients. That was the key issue, the transients. Every mic i've owned previously, AKG C141, Neumann tlm102, LewitLCT540, had a "harshness" in the 1-3khz range on every vocalist that i spent hours trying to remove from records. This new mic has everything I want in terms of body and character and sound, EXCEPT it gets harsh and painful in that EXACT range. I'm wondering if it's possibly my signal chain, or maybe im imagining things...

    I run the Tube mic into the mic input of my Focusrite ISA pre amp and then into my Scarlett 6i6 DI where it goes into my computer via USB 2.

    Help is much needed!!!
    Thanks!!

    Heres a sample of a completely dry vocal that had that harshness

     

    Attached Files:

  5. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    I feel your frustrations, you obviously have a good ear and are looking for better sound. Kudo's on your passion.

    Pretty much every mic I own sounds better through quality preamps and converters. That mic (although I have no experience with it) should sound pretty good and your Focusrite ISA micpre is good as well so that narrows things down to tracking levels and the converter analog counterparts.

    The converter is not the greatest from a pro audio standpoint so the way deal with harshness, keep your gain staging lower than what you are accustom to at present. Keep lowering it until your find the sweet spot.
    Higher end gear deals with headroom freq bursts and input levels in general, better.

    Your voice (singing) sounds good but I do hear a subtle limiting happening on this example which indicates something peaking on the way in (AD).

    Try recording at lower levels.
     
  6. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    Just for curiosity, what freq area do you find the harshest? Example: 3k, 5k, 7k etc?
     
  7. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    It's about 2k and it's triggered by my overtones.
     
  8. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    I can solve the problem sorta with a C1 multiband compressor, but I don't want to have to doctor every vocal. I would love to get a good sound from the start and work my way forward. I was considering returning the 251 and trying their U47 but the more I think about it, the more I realize it's probably not an issue with the mic
     
  9. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    Just a hunch, retrack that again but this time allow for 20db of upper mid headroom. Let me know how it sounds.
    When you process it, keep the mp3 around -8. Its cool to increase the volume, better increasing it to tracking hot.
     
  10. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    I can upload that in a few minutes! To the booth!
     
  11. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    Mulitbands are the last thing I use. I may use one (if you forced me) in mastering but never in the mix or tracking.
    Lower end analog gear actually sounds like multiband compression.
    You are way better off lowering your tracking level and allowing the preamp and capture to bloom before it ever needs crushing.
    It sounds like you have the C4 on right now? Don't use it for now. Lets isolate things.
     
  12. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    right on.
     
  13. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    Actually with that first MP3 it was completely dry. No processing at all!
     
  14. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    Good.

    I suspect your chain can be improved through gain staging strategies. Looking forward to your next example. More so, what you hear on your end next.
     
  15. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    Unfortunately, I still Hear it :(

     

    Attached Files:

  16. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    Quick side note, I had originally purchased the additional ADC card for my ISA before buying this mic which made the signal a bit fatter and clearer but still gave me troubles with those HF. Also, the only piece of gear that I haven't swapped out to try to solve this issue is the 6I6
     
  17. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    I ended up returning it because it wasn't worth it for $400
     
  18. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    The second version does sound better to me but I still hear what you are not liking. Unfortunately, you are reaching a point where it may cost more money now.
     
  19. DKAUDIO

    DKAUDIO DKAUDIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Location:
    Boston
    Any recommendations? Should I get a better AD converter? Or a better interface? The card made for the ISA wasn't amazing.
     
  20. audiokid

    audiokid Chris Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Home Page:
    Don't know for certain. Can you test gear before you buy where you are?

    The AD has impact on the sound. The interface moves digital to and from the DAW. Right now I believe you need to improve the analog side which would be any one of these. Mic, micpre, converter. I would only be guessing to say which is the weakest. My guess is your AD.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice