Studio Mag top 5 - poll

Discussion in 'Mixing & Song Critique' started by anonymous, Oct 26, 2001.

  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guests

    Feb 10, 2001
    Name your favorite mags in order of preference add why if the mood grabs ya!

    1) EQ - more bias towards alt rock and 'youth' music
    2) Sound On Sound - learn stuff / news
    3) Tape Op - Mad layout makes it last a (good) while 'cause it is so damn hard to read!!!!
    4) Mix
    5) Audio Media (europe edition is all I can get)

    I burn through em all!

    One extra question: do you belive interviewed engineers are always truthfull when they describe the techniques they use?

  2. mymarch

    mymarch Active Member

    Apr 14, 2001
    1 - S.O.S. - a nice balance of "hi" and "lo-fi"... and I've actually seen a bad review or 2 of gear here... go figure
    2 - EQ - same here too
    3 - TapeOp - well, you gotta love Tape-Op
    4 - Studio Sound - actually I don't know why...
    5 - Mix - cool, but sometimes too much pretentious and "corporate" drivel

    1 xtra answer: I don't really know... but just yesterday I stumbled on an old interview w/ Flood about recording drums for U2's POP. He went on about "3 mics this" and "mono that." So I popped in the cd to check it out... 3 mics my ass!

    Martin Trum
  3. audiaudio

    audiaudio Guest

    1 Studio Sound--the most literate and well-researched (by far); credibility+plus
    2 Mix--comprehensive, ambitious coverage
    3 Pro Sound News--in-depth articles on topics not found elsewhere
    4 EQ--competent, usually interesting (but unambitious)
    5 Electronic Musician--not, strictly speaking, an audio mag, but has incisive reviews relevant to audio pros
  4. drumsound

    drumsound Active Member

    Feb 12, 2001
    Bloomington, IL
    1. Tape Op- a real "in the trenches" record making magazine.
    2. EQ- really good interviews and columns Mr Bonzai and Al Kooper are great
    3. Mix- I get is free and it has a lot on info each month.
    4. Recording- I haven't read it in a while, but have gotten a lot out of it in the past (beside they have Scott Dorsey!)
    5. Pro Audio Review- just what it says a review/geek mag.

    I think people tell the truth in interviews, but there are most likely more details left out by the interviewer/interviewee/editor.
  5. hollywood_steve

    hollywood_steve Active Member

    Jan 3, 2001
    #1 Studio Sound - no contest
    #2 TapeOp - with a grain of salt
    #3 Audio Media - but I'm not happy with the multiple versions for specific geographic locations, I liked the old format better
    #4 Mix - just because the 400lb gorilla of the magazine world has so many more pages, there is bound to be some useful info
    #5 EQ by default - only because Recording has sunk so low into digital noise

    But I have been spending some time at the downtown branch of the LA public library recently and I have read thru many back issues of DB and REP, and also the AES Journal. The downward slide has been remarkable. A 1978 issue of DB or REP contains more solid info (as opposed to manufacturer's press releases) than one year's worth of current rags. Maybe that's why they are both long gone......

  6. Ang1970

    Ang1970 Well-Known Member

    Sep 5, 2000
    1. Taste
    2. Food&Wine
    3. Sound On Sound
    4. Tape Op
    5. Penthouse
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guests

    Feb 10, 2001
    "I have read thru many back issues of DB and REP, and also the AES Journal. The downward slide has been remarkable. A 1978 issue of DB or REP contains more solid info (as opposed to manufacturer's press releases) than one year's worth of current rags."
    - hollywood_steve

    Man! I LOVED Recording Engineer Producer, those engineer/ producer interviews were so detailed had diagrams the whole nine yards! Remember the one with the article on NS10's and different brands of toilet paper?

  8. 1. Mix
    2. ProSound News
    3. Studio Sound, European ed.
    4. Tape Disc Business
    5a. Uncut
    5b. Musiker Magasinet (Swedish mag.)

  9. 1) Studio Sound - the highest nutrition value,
    the least amount of BS
    2) Audio Media - similar to above
    3) Keys (Germany) - informative in a practical
    sense (CD audio/ROM with
    equipment tests, demos etc.)

  10. danchilde

    danchilde Guest


    1. Audiomedia
    2. Pro Audio Review
    3. Tape Op
    4. Mix...

    ...93. EQ: Prostitutes to the gear manufacturers, not of much value.
  11. simonsez

    simonsez Guest

    I only subscribe to 2 magazines....

    1-Tape Op (its FREE! but I would pay for it)
    2-Mac Addict, silly Apple rag

    The rest are tied for third.
    Barely Legal-Computer Music-No Depression-
    Punk Planet
    I page through all of the audio mags at the local Barnes and Noble, but rarely find anything that makes me want to buy them. MIX? I surely don't need to know what they are using at 'skywalker sound'.
  12. PlugHead

    PlugHead Active Member

    Jul 2, 2001
    1) Sound On Sound - not available where I live, but from what I've seen, is OK, with limited manufacturer ass-kissing
    2) EQ - Craig Anderton is an awesome guy, and an extremely useful resource, but the mag is an advertiser's wet-dream: some substance, but rare
    3) Mix - yet another whore to their advertisers, but one can almost always find something of use within the 250+ pages of ads, and corporate BS.
    4) Recording - cool for a few techniques, but low-end for achieving quality: seems targeted for home-studio owners wanting to play with the big leagues.
    5) Tape-Op - again, not available here ('tho if I wanted to subscribe for $69, they'd ship it int'l)

    my jaded .02 cents

    Question: When did audio magazines cease to be truthful? I don't recall one review in the last 3 years that didn't recommend you go out and buy this particular piece of shite right away! Where has the truth gone, and will it ever come back?

    PlugHead Productions
  13. Bear's Gone Fission

    Bear's Gone Fission Active Member

    Jan 4, 2001
    Love Tape-Op. Yeah, sometimes a grain of salt is necessary, sometime the whole shaker, but I get someone else's modus operandi from a Tape-Op article, which is better than any other rag usually gives.

    Recording is hit or miss. Dorsey and Rivers articles are good, I place stock in Dave Martin's gear reviews (loved the mini lesson he gave in micing technique w/ the Soundelux reviews). A lot is dreck, and it's more computer centric than I am, so of limited use to me.

    With the exception of most of Eddie Cilleti's columns, I hate Mix. Doesn't do a thing for me, as I'm not running with the crowd that have golden shovels hanging from chains at their necks.

    The other recording mags I don't find worth of mention, though I only really know the US ones.


Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice