Skip to main content

Ok guys. I've searched Sytek in this site, read all of the posts, and I still have some questions.

To start, I can't afford a 4 channel Sebatron nor do I see it happening any time soon. I need 4 nice channels and it just so happens my tax return will pay for a 4 channel Sytek.

What I want is some honest opinions.

How many steps up are they above those in my Tascam FW-1884? I imagine that it is one hell of a step up!

Also, the pres in my board have zero warmth obviously. does the Sytek has a richness or warmth to them that I should notice?

The pre's in my board lack detail and tend to sound like they "smudge" and muddy up my tracks. Should I be able to get a more airy sound for the Sytek with better definition?

I know these seem like dumb questions with a lot of outside factors. This seems to be the only solution in my price range for 4 channels. $850 to me is a huge deal since I only make $300 a week and pay rent, car, insurance, credit cards. etc.

I want to start improving the front end of my gear and make additions that won't be replaced, but instead added on to. I know over the next few years I'm going to be adding pres to my collection, and I just need to know if these are good enough to still get some use later down the road.

Thanks in advance!

Topic Tags

Comments

anonymous Wed, 01/26/2005 - 07:13

Arthur, your best bet is to contact the guys at Sytek and see about their return policy. Mr Stroica is very pleaseant to talk to on the phone and I am sure if you do not like it you can return it.

I happen to like mine alot. The regular channels are clean and clear without being brittle. You can even get the burr brown mods on 2 channels which are darker sounding if you like.

Definetly a step above your built in pre's

therecordingart Wed, 01/26/2005 - 17:00

Ok...my next question....I record a lot of heavier bands. I hear this pre is really clean....would it be too clean for rock/metal drums? I can't afford 4 API channels so that idea was scrapped a long time ago. Basically, I want a full sound up front and I'll dirty things up ITB if I need to. What do you think? This pre is going to mic a kick, top snare, and OH's. Then it would be used on everything else once the drums are tracked.

Any thoughts on this?

pmolsonmus Wed, 01/26/2005 - 18:13

I'm not gonna knock Mike or the Sytek, I received great service and I like the 4 channel with BurrBrown as well, but the only concern I have with the unit would be headroom. I like it on piano, acoustic guitars, aux percussion and classical recording stuff.
The real benefit of this unit is the ability to have multiple takes that don't get muddy or produce ugly artifacts. I'm not sure if the heavy metal drum application would be the best for this unit, but its built well and sounds great so take the above advise to try it out.

KurtFoster Fri, 01/28/2005 - 16:47

therecordingart wrote: One last question.....is this Sytek unit just a another mid-level product or does it deliver pro results that can sit next to the API and Neves of the world?

It's just a another mid-level product IMO. Comparing a Sytek to a Neve or an API is an unfair comparison ... apples and spinach!

"Clean" 'pristine" and "transparent" are easy to achive with very inexpesnsive op amp designs ... the Mackie pre proves that in that it specs out very well ....

The Sytek, for what it costs is fine ... a much better value, bang for the buck than say the RNP ... and its cost is more in line with what it's really worth unlike the RNP which I think is very overpriced. But even in the Neotek console configuration, this design is a budget first consideration, designed to a price point... the least expensive of the large format boards ... and as such you get what you pay for.

therecordingart Sun, 01/30/2005 - 00:38

Thanks, Kurt. What I think I'm going to do is pick up this unit for two reasons:

1. It's quite a step above what I've got now. (FW-1884 and a Behringer ADA800)

2. It can always be used as an overflow pre when I run out of "great" channels (once I get my API or Sebs of course).

My main concern is buying something that I won't replace. At this point it isn't cost effective for me to spend the money I don't have on a pre that won't pay for itself. I'm having a hard time getting on my feet in the audio world and bringing in enough money to pay for my gear. I want to maximize my gear so as I improve my skills I don't have to worry about having gear holding back the sonic integrity. At the same time I can't by 4 API and 4 Seb channels and only charge $15-$25 hr. On the same side of the token....no matter what gear I have in my home setup I don't think any bands would pay $50hr to record in a two bedroom studio unless they were gear heads and realized that an API with a D112 on a kick is what they are most likely hearing on their favorite albums.

I think the Sytek is going to fill the void in my lack of decent pres and be cost effective at the same time.

KurtFoster Sun, 01/30/2005 - 01:04

The Sytek will most likely be an improvement over the Behringer pres at least in build quality and longevity but I seriously doubt it will show a significant improvement in sound over the Tascam pres .. Tascam makes some decent stuff .. at least as good as Sytek IMO ...

As to keeping them, I see people all the time selling their Syteks, once they purchase the Sebatrons and Great Rivers etc. ... and I know of some who kept them and used them for overflow pres. So, it goes both ways.

I know this is a sensitive subject and I empathize. People want to improve their set ups but simply do not have the cash to spend on the really good stuff ... Manufacturers and designers realize this and see a huge market for these types of products, bigger than the boutique market by a long shot! To boot, the people who are attracted to this segment, are easier to sell stuff to because they don't have as much background knowledge or ear training as a discerning professional might. It's an easy mark for them and they do exploit it. To think they wouldn't would be naive

Just wishing that there was something that would perform better than the basic Mackie pre, doesn't make it so ... if that were the case we would have world peace in our time.

Very good pres are expensive .. decent pres are not so expensive ... and are found in almost any small mixer and in many available products offered. Please do not spend more than you need to ... I hate to see that happen.

tripnek Mon, 01/31/2005 - 09:45

I owned a Sytek but sold it shortly after I got it. The pre's are very "colorless". The pre's where a bit more open and clean than the Alesis mixer I was using at the time, but not a BIG difference there. The Alesis actually had more headroom. When I got my Allen and Heath console I sold the Sytek. The A&H pre's sounded better IMO and cost much less if you break it down per channel. I record mostly Hard Rock and Metal and the Sytek is just not well suited for these drum tracks unless you have a very consistent drummer. It did OK on overheads but just didn't have the head room needed the other drums. They are OK but over priced mid level gear in my opinion. Would be more suited to Jazz, classical, ect...

maintiger Mon, 01/31/2005 - 10:50

The sytek is really clean, so as to when you add up the tracks muddiness is not as much of a problem. By the sme token, the sytek being really clean it does not have much of an "attitude," which might be a draw back for some rock styles. I've been pairing mine with a tube mic (K2) and that gives me a little bit more of a rounder darker sound (specially with the barr brown option)

x

User login